040502x

Information about 040502x

Published on December 30, 2007

Author: george

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Can we say goodbye to the MSY theory and a pessimistic view of the state of the world fisheries? :  Can we say goodbye to the MSY theory and a pessimistic view of the state of the world fisheries? FAO suggested that the total world landings do not increase any more. The Maximum Sustainable Yield theory always guarantees the stock persistence; The adaptive management is one of the best ways against uncertain ecosystems. Anonymous straw man says Can we say goodbye to the MSY theory and a pessimistic view of the state of the world fisheries? :  Can we say goodbye to the MSY theory and a pessimistic view of the state of the world fisheries? FAO suggested that the total world landings do not increase any more. The Maximum Sustainable Yield theory always guarantees the stock persistence; The adaptive management is one of the best ways against uncertain ecosystems. I say the adaptive management sometimes results in undesired outcomes; I say the MSY theory does not guarantee coexistence of species = food web constraint; 4WFC organizer gave us the title of “getting more fish and reconciling fisheries with conservation”; Today’s my talk:  Today’s my talk We can get more fish sustainably; MSY theory does not guarantee biodiversity; Adaptive management is dangerous; Recommendations Can the world catch not really increase?:  Can the world catch not really increase? http://www.fao.org/fi/publ/circular/c920/intro.asp#A2 Species base statistics Landings of demersal marine fish has not grown since 1970s (FAO1996):  Landings of demersal marine fish has not grown since 1970s (FAO1996) http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/FISHERY/publ/sofia/fig5e.asp Landings of small pelagic fish is still increasing with fluctuation:  Landings of small pelagic fish is still increasing with fluctuation http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/FISHERY/publ/sofia/fig4e.asp Fishing Down– Is this bad?:  Fig. 1. Global trends of mean trophic level of fisheries landings, 1950 to 1994 Pauly et al. (Science1998:279:860;) Fishing Down– Is this bad? Marine areas inland areas mean trophic level Catch of lower trophic levels is a smaller impact. Decrease of mean trophic level in environment is bad. I often eat lower trophic level fish, but should eat more.:  21 I often eat lower trophic level fish, but should eat more. 650 yen (US$6) with coffee Whales consume fish more than human (Tamura & Ohsumi 1997):  Whales consume fish more than human (Tamura & Ohsumi 1997) “Initial” and recent biomass of whales:  “Initial” and recent biomass of whales Source: SeaWorld web site except minke whales (F. Kasamatsu, book in Japanese) Nothern Pacific minke whales eat anchovy.:  http://www.icrwhale.org/02-E.htm Nothern Pacific minke whales eat anchovy. Two phenotypes of whales-fisheries competition idea :  Two phenotypes of whales-fisheries competition idea By Japan Gov. Whales destroy the ocean. “...in a complicated food web structure, indirect effects of culling top predator (whales) on abundance of target fish is either positive or negative,...”  By Yodzis 2001 Trend Ecol Evol Fisheries destroy the ocean. Who is more familiar with environment? Rich or poor nations? Analysis of Ecological footprint (source WWF 2002):  Who is more familiar with environment? Rich or poor nations? Analysis of Ecological footprint (source WWF 2002) http://www.wwf.or.jp/activity/lpr2002/ EFP: global ha/person My comments on whale-fisheries competition:  My comments on whale-fisheries competition Top predators eat fish more than human We can get more fish if top predators decrease Top predators have decreased. Whales eat anchovy, do not directly compete with human or fisheries. We must consider reconciling with conservation Pelagic fish stock is unstable -- species replacement --:  Pelagic fish stock is unstable -- species replacement -- Matsuda & Katsukawa 2002 Fish Oceangr Cyclic Advantage Hypothesis Matsuda et al. (1992) Res. Pop. Ecol. 34:309-319 :  Cyclic Advantage Hypothesis Matsuda et al. (1992) Res. Pop. Ecol. 34:309-319 The next dominant to sardine is anchovy – -- Yes! As I predicted in 1992. The second next is chub mackerel -- Many people agree now Why did sardine stock collapse in 1990s?:  Why did sardine stock collapse in 1990s? Natural fluctuation (Watanabe et al. 1995 CJFAS) Failure of recruitments (getting older) Fallacy of critical period theory We can get more sardine in 1980s, more anchovy and Pacific saury now. At low stock level, fishing pressure may prevent from recovering... Q&A:  Q&A Q: Will western Pacific chub mackerel really recover? A: It depends on the fishing pressure Large fluctuation of recruitment in Northeastern Pacific chub mackerel:  Large fluctuation of recruitment in Northeastern Pacific chub mackerel Strong year classes appeared twice Kawai et al. 2002 Fish Sci Strong year classes were caught before the age at maturity:  Strong year classes were caught before the age at maturity Kawai et al. 2002 Fish Sci Fishers missed chance of recovery Kawai,…,Matsuda, Fish. Sci. 2002:  Fishers missed chance of recovery Kawai,…,Matsuda, Fish. Sci. 2002 actual stock abundance (million tons) Probability of stock recovery Kawai,…,Matsuda 2002 Fish Sci:  Probability of stock recovery Kawai,…,Matsuda 2002 Fish Sci The decade of 1990s was “Japan’s lost 10 years” Probability of stock recovery Future of Pelagic Fish Populations in the north-western Pacific::  Future of Pelagic Fish Populations in the north-western Pacific: If overfishing of immatures continues, Chub mackerel will not recover forever; If cyclic replacement hypothesis is true, Sardine will not recover forever; Do not catch immatures too much The overfishing is an experiment for my hypothesis. (Adaptive mismanagement) Today’s my talk:  Today’s my talk We can get more fish sustainably; MSY theory does not guarantee biodiversity; Adaptive management is dangerous; Recommendations Requiem to Maximum Sustainable Yield Theory:  Requiem to Maximum Sustainable Yield Theory Ecosystems are uncertain, non-equilibrium and complex. MSY theory ignores all the three. Does MSY theory guarantee species persistence? - No!! Stock abundance surplus production Kyoto Declaration and Plan of Action on the Sustainable Contribution of Fisheries to Food Security in 1992 (FAO):  Kyoto Declaration and Plan of Action on the Sustainable Contribution of Fisheries to Food Security in 1992 (FAO) Article 14 “When and where appropriate, consider harvesting multiple trophic levels in a manner consistent with sustainable development of these resources”. http://www.fao.org/fi/agreem/kyoto/kyoe.asp Examples of biological community at MSY (Matsuda & Abrams in review):  2 5 4 Examples of biological community at MSY (Matsuda & Abrams in review) 1 2 3 5 6 (b) 1 2 3 5 6 4 (a) 1 2 5 (c) Solution maximizing total yield from community MSY solution often reduces species and links; 1 2 6 4 (d) 1 3 6 (e) Examples of biological community at MSY (Matsuda & Abrams in review):  Examples of biological community at MSY (Matsuda & Abrams in review) 1 2 3 5 6 (b) 1 2 3 5 6 4 (a) 1 2 5 (c) 4 3 6 4 exploit more species, more trophic levels. 1 2 6 4 (d) 1 3 6 (e) Constrained MSY that guarantee coexistence Conclusion of story 2:  Conclusion of story 2 MSY theory does not guarantee species coexistence Fisheries must take care of biodiversity conservation explicitly = Foodweb constraint to reconciling fisheries with conservation Today’s my talk:  Today’s my talk We can get more fish sustainably; MSY theory does not guarantee biodiversity; Adaptive management is dangerous; Recommendations Feedback control in fishing effort is powerful...:  Feedback control in fishing effort is powerful... A straw man says; Even though the MSY level is unknown, the feedback control stabilizes a broad range of target stock level. Stock size N f(N) Feedback control with community interactions also result in undesired outcomes. (M & A in preparation):  Feedback control with community interactions also result in undesired outcomes. (M & A in preparation) r = (0.454,1.059,1.186,0.247,-0.006,-0.028,-0.059,-0.704,-0.308,-0.238) A = (aji) = e9 = 0.1, ei = 0 Feedback control may result in extinction of other species (sp. 6).:  Feedback control may result in extinction of other species (sp. 6). de9/dt = u(N9-N9*) ratio Conclusion of story 3:  Conclusion of story 3 Single stock monitoring is dangerous Target stock level is much more sensitive than we have considered in single stock models. We must monitor not only stock level of target species, but also the “entire” ecosystem. Today’s my talk:  Today’s my talk We can get more fish sustainably; MSY theory does not guarantee biodiversity; Adaptive management is dangerous; Recommendations Recommendations #1:  Recommendations #1 Do fishing down in food items!! Eat small pelagic fishes We can eat more fish, not use as fish meal!! Reduce discards before and after landings (our dishes); Establish food market of temporally fluctuating fishes at lower trophic levels Improve technology for effective use of lower trophic levels (Japan Soc. of Fisheries) Seafoods) Recommendations #2:  Recommendations #2 Switch a target fish for sp. replacement (Matsuda & Katsukawa 2002 Fish. Oceanogr) Monitor the ecosystems Conserve immatures; Improve technology for selective fishing Conserve both fishes and fisheries; Say goodbye to MSY reference points; I express sincere thanks to :  I express sincere thanks to The organizers for comfortable hospitality, especially Yvonne Sadovy; The audience who chose this session; I apologize that I must confess that I said as the straw man said; my English is very awk; I looked for positive answer for the session title

Related presentations


Other presentations created by george

BOD
30. 11. 2007
0 views

BOD

STRESSMANAGEMENT
06. 12. 2007
0 views

STRESSMANAGEMENT

homebirth
10. 12. 2007
0 views

homebirth

Fuel Cell technology programme
07. 11. 2007
0 views

Fuel Cell technology programme

MoCap
23. 11. 2007
0 views

MoCap

training presentation
04. 01. 2008
0 views

training presentation

Winery Planning Guide
04. 01. 2008
0 views

Winery Planning Guide

2 html cgi perl
06. 11. 2007
0 views

2 html cgi perl

wu
14. 11. 2007
0 views

wu

mysap lessons lrnd
28. 11. 2007
0 views

mysap lessons lrnd

VENEZIA ITALIAN AUDIOVISUAL
03. 10. 2007
0 views

VENEZIA ITALIAN AUDIOVISUAL

Metabolism
06. 03. 2008
0 views

Metabolism

B3u5
10. 03. 2008
0 views

B3u5

Martin Thornton v4
12. 03. 2008
0 views

Martin Thornton v4

m220w01
07. 11. 2007
0 views

m220w01

IVAConferencegompers 1
18. 03. 2008
0 views

IVAConferencegompers 1

wdubb2x5klc7cpr
21. 03. 2008
0 views

wdubb2x5klc7cpr

Millennial 3
26. 03. 2008
0 views

Millennial 3

attitudestoimmigrants
07. 04. 2008
0 views

attitudestoimmigrants

domingos
19. 12. 2007
0 views

domingos

DESSAC
04. 10. 2007
0 views

DESSAC

KurlantzickPowerPoint
11. 10. 2007
0 views

KurlantzickPowerPoint

ccj jun2000
09. 10. 2007
0 views

ccj jun2000

domestic cooking en
04. 03. 2008
0 views

domestic cooking en

wecPPT0525f
24. 02. 2008
0 views

wecPPT0525f

Bridges TTVN
29. 12. 2007
0 views

Bridges TTVN

IntellectualFreedomA ndPrivacy
15. 11. 2007
0 views

IntellectualFreedomA ndPrivacy

myslovitz2
21. 11. 2007
0 views

myslovitz2

BDDSlideShow
28. 02. 2008
0 views

BDDSlideShow

Storing
07. 01. 2008
0 views

Storing

san pedro mkt soc
16. 11. 2007
0 views

san pedro mkt soc

Kris Array Slicing
07. 01. 2008
0 views

Kris Array Slicing

EECCAspecifics eng
27. 09. 2007
0 views

EECCAspecifics eng