38TexSec7Consulations

Information about 38TexSec7Consulations

Published on January 16, 2008

Author: Patrizia

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Texas NRCS Consultation Section 7 (a) (2) of ESA:  Texas NRCS Consultation Section 7 (a) (2) of ESA Susan Baggett State Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS, Texas ESA Consultation in TX :  ESA Consultation in TX Two Biological Opinions in place as result of two consultation processes: Leon River Restoration Project (2004) – 773,000 acres in 2 counties in central Texas “Statewide” brush management project (2005)– 25+ millions acres in 62 counties west of I-35 in Texas Brief Background:  Brief Background Increased funding of Farm Bill programs Locally-led processes indicated increasing interest in brush management Culture of strong private lands rights Presence of T & E Species Brush Management:  Brush Management GM 190.410.22:  GM 190.410.22 (e)(5) Section 7 (a)(2) of the ESA (i) NRCS is required to consult with the Services when NRCS financial assistance will be provided to landowners for implementing planned practices for which a “may affect” determination has been made. Initiate the Process:  Initiate the Process Working with the workgroup, NRCS assessed plant and animal species listed as threatened or endangered whose range coincided with the range of the 4 target brush species 2 birds 2 insects 6 fish 1 reptile 2 amphibians 16 plants Honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa):  Honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) Redberry Juniper (Juniperus smallii):  Redberry Juniper (Juniperus smallii) Ashe juniper (Juniperus ashei):  Ashe juniper (Juniperus ashei) Salt cedar (Tamarix spp.):  Salt cedar (Tamarix spp.) Eleven Conservation Practices Addressed in BA:  Eleven Conservation Practices Addressed in BA Brush Management Mechanical Chemical Prescribed Burning Firebreak Prescribed Grazing Fence Eleven Conservation Practices Addressed in BA - continued:  Eleven Conservation Practices Addressed in BA - continued Grazing Land Mechanical Treatment Pipeline Pond Range Planting Upland Wildlife Habitat Management Watering Facility Seven 2002 Farm Bill Programs Addressed:  Seven 2002 Farm Bill Programs Addressed Conservation Security Program Environmental Quality Incentive Program Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program Grassland Reserve Program Grazing Lands Conservation Initiative Wetland Reserve Program Wildlife Habitat Conservation Program Biological Assessment:  Biological Assessment During the biological assessment process, the NRCS determined that a proposed program action - i.e. brush management on these four brush species - “may affect” two of the species assessed - the GCW and BCV NRCS requested consultation from USFWS under Section 7(a) (2) of ESA Golden-cheeked Warbler (GCW) :  Golden-cheeked Warbler (GCW) Black-capped vireo (BCV):  Black-capped vireo (BCV) Summary of Provisions of BO:  Summary of Provisions of BO Specific acreages of GCW and BVC habitat allowed as “incidental take” Maximum acreages set for all recovery areas Reasonable and prudent measures described Habitat ID and treatment guidelines established for BCV and GCW Summary of Provisions of BO-cont.:  Summary of Provisions of BO-cont. Required habitat management plan written for each program participant by biologist of NRCS or state wildlife agency Includes accelerated training of NRCS employees and partners on identification of all T&E species Summary of Provisions of BO -cont.:  Summary of Provisions of BO -cont. NRCS, landowners, and brush contractors are required to attend training on habitat ID and treatment criteria Duration of biological opinion is for “all contracts funded prior to the expiration of the 2002 Farm Bill” PROCESS RECAP:  PROCESS RECAP Meeting called by state Sec of Ag Workgroup formed, led by NRCS NRCS worked with workgroup to develop biological assessment (BA) BA presented to USWFS USFWS issued Biological Opinion (BO) Members of Consultation Workgroup w/ NRCS:  Members of Consultation Workgroup w/ NRCS Audubon Texas Central Texas Cattlemen’s Association Environmental Defense Texas Cooperative Extension Texas Department of Agriculture Texas Farm Bureau Texas Parks and Wildlife Department The Nature Conservancy Texas Wildlife Association US Fish and Wildlife Service Time Frame:  Time Frame Leon River Restoration Project – 80 days “Statewide” Brush Management Project –– 256 days Varied with size of project area, complexity of resources, amount of available resource information and experience level of key players Is it worth the investment?:  Is it worth the investment? Absolutely, unequivocally …YES! It is a WIN-WIN process Now I just have to convince the rest of the State Leadership Team with NRCS in TX of that … KEYS TO SUCCESS::  KEYS TO SUCCESS: Partnerships Trust Communication Willingness to collaborate High-quality technical information Strong desire to move forward Ability to implement provisions Many thanks to … :  Many thanks to … Gary Valentine, State Biologist for NRCS in Texas (retired 11/1/2004) Thank you for listening:  Thank you for listening

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Patrizia

08 Paez Liliana
09. 01. 2008
0 views

08 Paez Liliana

Rauktis
11. 01. 2008
0 views

Rauktis

Chapter 03 final
14. 01. 2008
0 views

Chapter 03 final

edu206bnewppt
14. 01. 2008
0 views

edu206bnewppt

trt 10
15. 01. 2008
0 views

trt 10

Zurich
15. 01. 2008
0 views

Zurich

foundation
16. 01. 2008
0 views

foundation

qad2
16. 01. 2008
0 views

qad2

uwi caricom collaboration
18. 01. 2008
0 views

uwi caricom collaboration

LAO Overview 2005 Presentation
21. 01. 2008
0 views

LAO Overview 2005 Presentation

combined presentation
23. 01. 2008
0 views

combined presentation

Bus Rapid Transit
04. 02. 2008
0 views

Bus Rapid Transit

Ancient Greece Powerpoint
11. 02. 2008
0 views

Ancient Greece Powerpoint

12 Legumes
22. 01. 2008
0 views

12 Legumes

FatigueFactors
25. 01. 2008
0 views

FatigueFactors

Troy
07. 02. 2008
0 views

Troy

MesopotamiaandEgypt 000
13. 02. 2008
0 views

MesopotamiaandEgypt 000

Pulwarty
18. 01. 2008
0 views

Pulwarty

bo20605
22. 02. 2008
0 views

bo20605

22nov05 3 02 Pangalos
25. 02. 2008
0 views

22nov05 3 02 Pangalos

DoubleTreeShow
27. 02. 2008
0 views

DoubleTreeShow

chicken pox story
28. 02. 2008
0 views

chicken pox story

HRToptions
29. 02. 2008
0 views

HRToptions

Personnel Management
16. 03. 2008
0 views

Personnel Management

WorldQuest 2007 with answers
13. 01. 2008
0 views

WorldQuest 2007 with answers

2007 4300S1 05
25. 03. 2008
0 views

2007 4300S1 05

econ153 lecture4
11. 03. 2008
0 views

econ153 lecture4

redding slides
16. 04. 2008
0 views

redding slides

y200832411557
17. 04. 2008
0 views

y200832411557

Maynard QI Reliability
18. 04. 2008
0 views

Maynard QI Reliability

0RegansLegacy
21. 04. 2008
0 views

0RegansLegacy

StorySegmentation 05312006
22. 04. 2008
0 views

StorySegmentation 05312006

Book2 Unit5
16. 04. 2008
0 views

Book2 Unit5

Historical Background
24. 04. 2008
0 views

Historical Background

First Day 317B
14. 01. 2008
0 views

First Day 317B

CHEA Nielson GATS Higher Ed
08. 05. 2008
0 views

CHEA Nielson GATS Higher Ed

2006CitizenSurvey
14. 03. 2008
0 views

2006CitizenSurvey

Tribes presentation
30. 04. 2008
0 views

Tribes presentation

math isat
02. 05. 2008
0 views

math isat

oz
02. 05. 2008
0 views

oz

coloring book generic
05. 02. 2008
0 views

coloring book generic

iaa about us ergo 2007
05. 03. 2008
0 views

iaa about us ergo 2007

HST353 16
23. 01. 2008
0 views

HST353 16

THE OVERLAP
29. 01. 2008
0 views

THE OVERLAP

egr470
05. 03. 2008
0 views

egr470

ramel2007a
03. 03. 2008
0 views

ramel2007a

abadi fcs arspa floc06
31. 01. 2008
0 views

abadi fcs arspa floc06

TRB 2005 McMillan
21. 03. 2008
0 views

TRB 2005 McMillan

Le ST5 KuaFu Symposium 2007 01
17. 01. 2008
0 views

Le ST5 KuaFu Symposium 2007 01

Student Outreach Presentation
20. 03. 2008
0 views

Student Outreach Presentation

session 17 zalk barrierbanding
07. 03. 2008
0 views

session 17 zalk barrierbanding