Accrediting Doctoral Programs

Information about Accrediting Doctoral Programs

Published on January 11, 2008

Author: Dionigi

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Accrediting Doctoral Programs into the 21st Century:  Accrediting Doctoral Programs into the 21st Century Dr. Luis G. Pedraja Executive Associate Director MSCHE Tbilisi State University 25-26 June 2005 Assessing Challenges and Strategies for Quality Assurance in Graduate Programs PRESENTATION OVERVIEW:  PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Background: What is Accreditation? The Bologna Process: Implications Accreditation Criteria General & Specific Considerations Assessment Considerations Challenges & Opportunities Conclusion & Questions Background: What is Accreditation?:  Background: What is Accreditation? Quality Assurance & Enhancement Sustains and strengthens quality and integrity Seeks a commitment to excellence & improvement Promotes public confidence Self-Regulation & Peer Review Voluntary and/or Government Mandated The Bologna Process: Implications:  The Bologna Process: Implications Berlin Communiqué: Doctoral Degree as Third Cycle (Level) Access to Doctoral Studies: Masters Level/ Second Cycle & Specific Access Requirements Salzburg (2005): Ten Principles Duration of Degree: 2-3 Years Assessment; Transparency; Research Sources: “A framework for Qualification for the European Higher Education Area”; Bergen Communiqué. Accreditation Criteria:  Accreditation Criteria Appropriate to institution’s mission and context Focused study & relevant independent research Specialized nature & program coherence Mastery of increasingly difficult subject matter Differentiates between degree levels Curricula provide for development of research and independent thinking skills at advanced level Faculty with appropriate credentials Assessment of student learning outcomes & improvements made based on assessment Source: Characteristics of Excellence in Higher Education (MSCHE) General & Specific Considerations:  General & Specific Considerations Does It Fit the Institution’s Mission & Context? Institutional commitment to the field & program Adequate Funding & Support Are There Adequate Resources? Access to information (libraries; Internet; etc.) Research capabilities (equipment, funds, etc.) Qualified faculty (Ph.D.s; field of specialization; experience) What Are the Program Goals? Develop researchers, scholars, teachers, peers, and/or independent thinkers General & Specific Considerations:  General & Specific Considerations What Are Some Desired Skills? comprehensive knowledge base of subject & applicable research methodology/techniques able to contribute to field through research, publications & development of new skills or processes ability to effectively communicate subject matter to specialist/non-specialist and instruct others Skilled in critical thinking, analysis, evaluation, problem solving, self-reflection, and independent thinking Adapted from Jenny Moon, “Linking Levels, Learning Outcomes and Assessment,” Exeter University. Assessment Considerations:  Assessment Considerations Depend on Goals and Desired Skills/Outcomes Direct & Indirect Measures (Do they reflect desired outcomes?): Comprehensive exams, dissertation/ thesis Presentations, symposia, and/or dissertation defense Supervised teaching & research Benchmarks and data comparison with others Marketability of students (Are they being hired?) Long term: promotions & contributions to field by graduates Indirect Measures: evaluations, focus groups, etc. Challenges & Opportunities:  Challenges & Opportunities Adequate Peer Review: Not enough qualified peers at doctoral level for effective review in some areas of study and geographical regions Availability of reviewers Cost and travel concerns Cultural & Political Considerations: Language and cultural differences Academic freedom & censorship Political instability & government support Challenges & Opportunities:  Challenges & Opportunities Resources & Comparability: Available resources can vary between regions, institutions, and programs Intensity and rigor of program are difficult to assess Pedagogical Training: Doctoral students need training in pedagogy & supervised teaching opportunity to be effective instructors (often absent in programs) Globalization: Market demands & ease of communication Conclusions:  Conclusions Does one model fit all? Differences between academic & professional degrees Need to account for differences between disciplines (technical, scientific, social sciences, humanities, etc) Importance of cultural contexts (cultural differences can contribute new insights, perspectives, etc) Non-traditional models should not be dismissed Continued dialogue enriches the process & assures success Resources:  Resources Resources Available on Internet: Middle States Commission on Higher Education Publications (U.S.A.): www.msche.org Bologna Process: www.bologna-bergen2005.no/ www.aic.lv/ace/ace_disk/Bologna/index.htm Contact Information: Dr. Luis G. Pedraja: [email protected]

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Dionigi

Presentation Real Estate EY
30. 01. 2008
0 views

Presentation Real Estate EY

data mining
05. 02. 2008
0 views

data mining

FISC
04. 02. 2008
0 views

FISC

WagonYvesMerel
08. 01. 2008
0 views

WagonYvesMerel

Forensic Glass Analysis
09. 01. 2008
0 views

Forensic Glass Analysis

Botany Basics 4
12. 01. 2008
0 views

Botany Basics 4

Canham Attitude
13. 01. 2008
0 views

Canham Attitude

vaginal atrophy Elghany
14. 01. 2008
0 views

vaginal atrophy Elghany

Parsis of India
15. 01. 2008
0 views

Parsis of India

ljyong 20061229104459
15. 01. 2008
0 views

ljyong 20061229104459

JazzAge
16. 01. 2008
0 views

JazzAge

Langston Hughes
04. 02. 2008
0 views

Langston Hughes

Primer design
07. 02. 2008
0 views

Primer design

world history
12. 02. 2008
0 views

world history

open eyes for justice
28. 01. 2008
0 views

open eyes for justice

FrozenGround SnowCover 032806
19. 01. 2008
0 views

FrozenGround SnowCover 032806

articles 59041 peshawar2
11. 02. 2008
0 views

articles 59041 peshawar2

Merchandising session3
14. 02. 2008
0 views

Merchandising session3

population growth
20. 02. 2008
0 views

population growth

PMMforKatrina
25. 02. 2008
0 views

PMMforKatrina

Elias
15. 01. 2008
0 views

Elias

6 21 San Diego
28. 02. 2008
0 views

6 21 San Diego

schreiner
05. 03. 2008
0 views

schreiner

PPPLec4Intro
11. 03. 2008
0 views

PPPLec4Intro

A Changing Actuarial World
15. 03. 2008
0 views

A Changing Actuarial World

PE2 U7 W
21. 03. 2008
0 views

PE2 U7 W

UNLEnergyCenter
23. 01. 2008
0 views

UNLEnergyCenter

20060226
05. 02. 2008
0 views

20060226

Language Families
03. 04. 2008
0 views

Language Families

AbbottPhilip
08. 05. 2008
0 views

AbbottPhilip

Barnes PP
09. 01. 2008
0 views

Barnes PP

presentatie
21. 01. 2008
0 views

presentatie

2o9o41874o 1
25. 01. 2008
0 views

2o9o41874o 1

Poster CLEO2007 final
09. 01. 2008
0 views

Poster CLEO2007 final

process
18. 02. 2008
0 views

process

PART3 Peripheral Injuries
22. 01. 2008
0 views

PART3 Peripheral Injuries

Zachary Kunkel
09. 01. 2008
0 views

Zachary Kunkel