agmiklas

Information about agmiklas

Published on December 18, 2007

Author: Margot

Source: authorstream.com

Content

The Strength of Weak Ties:  The Strength of Weak Ties Mark S. Granovetter The American Journal of Sociology, 1973 Slides Prepared By: Andrew Miklas Introduction:  Introduction “One of the most influential sociology papers ever written” (Barabasi) One of the most cited (Current Contents, 1986) Interviewed people and asked: “How did you find your job?” Kept getting the the same answer: “through an acquaintance, not a friend” Context:  Context Lots of studies of macro patterns Social mobility, community organization Data and studies for micro behavior Interactions within small groups Limited understanding of how micro behavior translates into macro patterns Network Analysis:  Network Analysis Analysis of the interaction network bridge the gap between micro and macro Interaction network Nodes: People Edges: Between people with a social relationship Weight: strength of connection Quantize to either “weak” or “strong” Bridges:  Bridges Bridge: An edge that is part of every path between two nodes Bridge b/w red & green Local Bridges:  Local Bridges Local Bridge of degree N: An edge that is part of every path of length less than N Generalization of a bridge Local bridge of deg 3 b/w A & B A B Bridges:  Bridges Bridges allow diffusion of information between otherwise disconnected communities. Local bridges bring otherwise distant communities together “Bridge” concept provides an important piece of the micro => macro puzzle What sort of relationships act as bridges? Granovetter Transitivity:  Granovetter Transitivity The stronger the tie between A and B, the larger the overlap in their relationship circles Strong tie => lots of time together => lots of opportunity for B to meet the A’s friends similarity => greater chance that B will be “compatible” with A’s friends physiological need for congruence => B will have a natural affinity for A’s friends, based on A’s opinion of them Forbidden Triad:  Forbidden Triad This triad will resolve to a fully connected triad New edge need not be strong Alternate: Any time strong tie A-B exists, then all of A’s strong ties will be at least weakly connected to B Supported by evidence All Bridges are Weak Ties!:  All Bridges are Weak Ties! Proof: If A-B and A-C are strong, then forbidden triad implies that B-C is at least weak If A-B is deleted, then A can still reach B via A-C-B Small corner case: if both nodes have only a strong edge to each other, and no other strong edges, than it is a bridge Unlikely in reality All local bridges are also weak ties Proof is identical Implications:  Implications Removal of weak ties raises path lengths more than removal of strong ties Assume: probability of info passing successfully between two nodes is proportional to the number of paths connecting the two nodes is inversely proportional to length of those paths Conclusion: Removal of a weak edge damages the connectivity more than the removal of a strong edge Evidence:  Evidence Junior High Experiment: (Rapoport and Horvath, 1961) Student writes down an ordered list of 8 friend Pick a random starting student Breadth first search on 1st and 2nd friends Count number of students seen after each cycle Repeat using 3/4th, 5/6th, 7/8th Largest number of people reached by using 7/8th, smallest using 1/2nd Community Effects:  Community Effects Tipping Point:  Tipping Point An individual’s uptake of a new technique depends on how many of those around him have “bought in” The “Tipping Point” (Gladwell, 2000) Quickly adopted techniques must be rapidly spread to many cliques Tipping Point:  Tipping Point People with many weak ties critical to spreading the idea Example: Mass Hysteria in Textile Factory Earliest people “infected” were: friends with very few acquaintances with many Acted as “seeders”, rapidly disseminating idea to many friend circles at once Community Co-ordination:  Community Co-ordination Imagine a community organizing to defeat a common threat Requires organization and leadership Leadership requires trust in the leaders Trust is difficult without a connection Community Co-ordination:  Community Co-ordination Without weak links, community exists as a set of strongly connected, but disjoint cliques No one suitable to act as a leader for all Example: Boston West End Connections were mainly family-based Few ways for weak links to be formed Individual Effects:  Individual Effects Access to Resources:  Access to Resources Our weak ties are with people whose ties are with those socially distant to us. Weak ties bring us knowledge of our community not available through friends Many weak ties => more access to wider community’s ideas, resources, etc. Few weak ties => little information of outside world Access to Resources:  Access to Resources Example: Academic Hiring School’s reluctance to hire your own PhD’s Want to prevent “intellectual inbreeding” Finding a Job:  Finding a Job Do leads for new jobs come through strong or weak contacts? Strong: More motivation to help you, since they know you better Weak: Likely less overlap with leads you can easily get elsewhere Study by author shows that weak wins Most job referrals come through those who we see rarely: old school friends, former co-workers, etc. Slide22:  http://www.analytictech.com/networks/weakties.htm Conclusions:  Conclusions Personal relationships (micro) bound to large-scale social structure (macro) Opposite to what you might expect: Weak personal relationships bind communities together Exclusively strong ties lead to global fragmentation

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Margot

globalisation
28. 12. 2007
0 views

globalisation

Creativity
13. 12. 2007
0 views

Creativity

beng
27. 09. 2007
0 views

beng

AAAS 20060621
03. 10. 2007
0 views

AAAS 20060621

legionella111803
09. 10. 2007
0 views

legionella111803

undergroundrailroad
03. 12. 2007
0 views

undergroundrailroad

Section3Df2007
07. 11. 2007
0 views

Section3Df2007

visual
12. 11. 2007
0 views

visual

TDDFTRealtime
20. 11. 2007
0 views

TDDFTRealtime

sleep disorders 3 11 03
01. 12. 2007
0 views

sleep disorders 3 11 03

rowcliffe
19. 12. 2007
0 views

rowcliffe

KNS 422
07. 01. 2008
0 views

KNS 422

lec2 1
14. 11. 2007
0 views

lec2 1

romanesque
02. 11. 2007
0 views

romanesque

MG
05. 01. 2008
0 views

MG

Library
20. 02. 2008
0 views

Library

WomensPlaceinKorea
24. 02. 2008
0 views

WomensPlaceinKorea

copyrightlawbasics
27. 02. 2008
0 views

copyrightlawbasics

ctlecture13a
05. 11. 2007
0 views

ctlecture13a

2004 DP Flex Rule
28. 11. 2007
0 views

2004 DP Flex Rule

Catton
05. 03. 2008
0 views

Catton

EMS 2007 for media kit
14. 03. 2008
0 views

EMS 2007 for media kit

chakavarti
27. 03. 2008
0 views

chakavarti

report to UNAIDS may12
30. 03. 2008
0 views

report to UNAIDS may12

hobday slides
13. 04. 2008
0 views

hobday slides

103102 hipaasummit security
02. 11. 2007
0 views

103102 hipaasummit security

07 Gaines Caruso EMO 2007 r1
06. 12. 2007
0 views

07 Gaines Caruso EMO 2007 r1

01povraz
07. 01. 2008
0 views

01povraz

POSLink Overview
26. 11. 2007
0 views

POSLink Overview

StateAssocconfcall11 052007
23. 11. 2007
0 views

StateAssocconfcall11 052007

034
16. 11. 2007
0 views

034

Canned Food Drive General
05. 11. 2007
0 views

Canned Food Drive General

benke
23. 12. 2007
0 views

benke

stacey poster
15. 11. 2007
0 views

stacey poster

MelansonChp2
21. 12. 2007
0 views

MelansonChp2

Durhamo4
04. 01. 2008
0 views

Durhamo4