ASEE Annual Conf 2005 OFI

Information about ASEE Annual Conf 2005 OFI

Published on January 14, 2008

Author: Marco1

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Student profile of the incoming First Year Class of the College of Engineering at UPRM and their academic performance after their first year:  Student profile of the incoming First Year Class of the College of Engineering at UPRM and their academic performance after their first year Dr. David González Barreto Dr. Antonio A. González Quevedo Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez Presented at 2005 ASEE Annual Conference Portland, Oregon June 13, 2005 Background Information for the College of Engineering:  Background Information for the College of Engineering In 2003, the College of Engineering of the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez had an undergraduate enrollment of 4,476. This enrollment places our college in the 13th position of United States of America Engineering Schools. Texas A&M ranked number 1 with 6,411 students (ASEE Prism, Summer 2004). Our college granted 680 bachelor’s degrees in 2001-2002, ranking number 1 in the degrees granted to Hispanics. The second spot belonged to Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico with 305 degrees, and the third to Florida International University with 154 bachelor’s degrees awarded (ASEE Prism, December 2003). Objectives:  Objectives Show the profile of incoming engineering freshmen from 1990-2003 at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez: Admission index (AI) Type of high school Gender High school grade point average (GPA) College Board Scores in Aptitude and Achievement Tests A comparison between actual admission criteria and suggested alternative criteria is also presented. This longitudinal comparison is carried out to evaluate proposed changes in admission criteria in the future. Outline of the Presentation:  Outline of the Presentation Profile of the Incoming First Year Engineering Classes Description of Admission Criteria Performance of the students after their First Year in College Suggested Admission Criteria Findings and Conclusions Bibliography Acknowledgements Profile: Mean HS GPA by School Type:  Profile: Mean HS GPA by School Type Profile: Mean Verbal Aptitude by Type of School:  Profile: Mean Verbal Aptitude by Type of School Profile: Mean Math Aptitude by Type of School:  Profile: Mean Math Aptitude by Type of School Description of Admission Criteria:  Description of Admission Criteria The Admission Index (IGS) calculated for each prospective freshmen and used by the University of Puerto Rico system to decide who are admitted. The admission index formula was changed by the Board of Trustees for the incoming class of 1995 The index includes three components: the high school grade point average, College Entrance Examination Board (CEEB) score for Verbal Aptitude (Spanish), CEEB score for Mathematical Aptitude The high school GPA has a weight of 50% of the value of the admission index, while the Mathematical and Verbal Aptitude each represent 25% of the AI. Mean AI by Type of School:  Mean AI by Type of School Average Admission Index per Year – Engineering:  Average Admission Index per Year – Engineering HS and 1st Year GPAs per Type of School:  HS and 1st Year GPAs per Type of School Summary of Incoming Students Profile:  Summary of Incoming Students Profile The average entering class of engineering is 761 students, of which 62% are male and 38% is female Average high school grade point average is higher for public schools students, 3.84/4.0 when compared to private schools students who average 3.79/4.0. The average GPA has increased for the 14 years of study from 3.67 to 3.86. Average first year grade point average is higher for students coming from private schools. Average CEEB scores have decreased for the duration of this study with the exception of the English Achievement component. Average CEEB scores were higher for all six components for private school students. Comparison with USA Trends1:  Comparison with USA Trends1 The percentage of institutions for which high school GPA or rank is “very important” has increased steadily since 1979 The percentage of institutions for which high school GPA or rank is the single most important factor has decreased steadily Admission test scores show a steady increase as a “very important” factor has increased steadily California has recently proposed that aptitude test scores be replaced by achievement test scores 1 Taken from, Trends in College Admission 2000, by Hunter Breland, James Maxey, Renee Gernand, Tammie Cumming and Catherine Trapani. Can be downloaded from the AIR site. Prediction Models:  Prediction Models Models were based on predicting the first year grade point average based on the high school great point average, and the five CEEB scores Model: 1st Year GPA = f(GPA, Verbal Aptitude, Mathematical Aptitude, English Achievement, Mathematical Achievement, Spanish Achievement) + ε Prediction Models:  Prediction Models Prediction Models:  Prediction Models Best Subsets Methods – College of Engineering:  Best Subsets Methods – College of Engineering Summary of comparison of models:  Summary of comparison of models The model with three variables that best predicts 1st year GPA contains the following variables: High school GPA, Mathematical Achievement and English Achievement. In general, the analysis suggests that more than three variables should be used in order to improve the prediction ability (Cp). It is necessary to incorporate other additional variables in the model since the percentage of the variability explained by the models is low (but comparable to similar studies). For example, the number of credits in key courses (e.g science and math) taken in high school could be a variable to be considered. Bibliography:  Bibliography ASEE. (2004). Prism. “Databytes”. Page 24. Summer. ASEE. (2004). Prism. “Databytes”. Page 19. December. MINITAB® Release 14. (2004). Minitab Inc. State College, PA. Montgomery, Douglas C., Peck, Elizabeth A., and Vining, Geoffrey G. (2003). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. Wiley and Sons, New York. Pike, Gary R. and Saupe, Joseph L. (2002). “Does High School Matter? An Analysis of Three Methods of Predicting First-Year Grades.” Research in Higher Education. 43(2), pp. 187-207. Wilson, Kenneth M. (1983). A Review of Research on the Prediction of Academic Performance after the Freshman Year. College Board Report No. 83-2. Acknowledgements:  Acknowledgements The authors want to acknowledge the effort by Leo I. Vélez and Irmannette Torres from the Office of Institutional Research and Planning of the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez for providing and validating the data used in this study. Additional information:  Additional information Contact us at: [email protected] [email protected] Download this presentation at: http://oiip.uprm.edu/pres.html

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Marco1

Introduction to Graph Rewriting
10. 01. 2008
0 views

Introduction to Graph Rewriting

shoretel6 1
08. 01. 2008
0 views

shoretel6 1

0907
09. 01. 2008
0 views

0907

indi food
10. 01. 2008
0 views

indi food

barclays
11. 01. 2008
0 views

barclays

EVERYONES BUSINESS
12. 01. 2008
0 views

EVERYONES BUSINESS

newbrnresus
15. 01. 2008
0 views

newbrnresus

Information Campaign Salvi
15. 01. 2008
0 views

Information Campaign Salvi

24346
15. 01. 2008
0 views

24346

Wildlife  And  Conservation
15. 01. 2008
0 views

Wildlife And Conservation

Baxter
16. 01. 2008
0 views

Baxter

tyner purdue
23. 01. 2008
0 views

tyner purdue

italian renaissance
05. 02. 2008
0 views

italian renaissance

The Tudors
11. 02. 2008
0 views

The Tudors

Attitudes 2
17. 01. 2008
0 views

Attitudes 2

Textiles
25. 01. 2008
0 views

Textiles

Bristol MurderXNtMvFSZ
28. 01. 2008
0 views

Bristol MurderXNtMvFSZ

McCarthy
30. 01. 2008
0 views

McCarthy

2 Saving Money Time HEEP Area 1
07. 02. 2008
0 views

2 Saving Money Time HEEP Area 1

5WR N Africa SW Asia
13. 02. 2008
0 views

5WR N Africa SW Asia

Fundraising
15. 02. 2008
0 views

Fundraising

gabidimeworkshop
22. 01. 2008
0 views

gabidimeworkshop

Hmong American Elders
29. 01. 2008
0 views

Hmong American Elders

R2 Solutions
20. 02. 2008
0 views

R2 Solutions

Festivals around the world
22. 02. 2008
0 views

Festivals around the world

Mercury Mars Venus
24. 01. 2008
0 views

Mercury Mars Venus

BookofMormonChapter7 8and9
12. 02. 2008
0 views

BookofMormonChapter7 8and9

CNE354HellGreece4
25. 02. 2008
0 views

CNE354HellGreece4

Lessons from Bees
25. 02. 2008
0 views

Lessons from Bees

PS 280 13 mood disorders
27. 02. 2008
0 views

PS 280 13 mood disorders

fitness
29. 02. 2008
0 views

fitness

PrimalSeasCvt
11. 02. 2008
0 views

PrimalSeasCvt

WETICE2004 Albrechtsen
03. 03. 2008
0 views

WETICE2004 Albrechtsen

Gregory Thomas PPT
14. 03. 2008
0 views

Gregory Thomas PPT

Poster Template FOR VOLUNTEERS
27. 03. 2008
0 views

Poster Template FOR VOLUNTEERS

Respirators
22. 01. 2008
0 views

Respirators

All about me
14. 04. 2008
0 views

All about me

The Popcorn Process
07. 02. 2008
0 views

The Popcorn Process

79989
18. 04. 2008
0 views

79989

ASFP
21. 04. 2008
0 views

ASFP

Forest3 302
22. 04. 2008
0 views

Forest3 302

auxFundamentals
24. 04. 2008
0 views

auxFundamentals

ShowalterPPT
11. 01. 2008
0 views

ShowalterPPT

umist
04. 02. 2008
0 views

umist

L7 global
08. 05. 2008
0 views

L7 global

unit 1 2
19. 03. 2008
0 views

unit 1 2

2005121133941157
30. 04. 2008
0 views

2005121133941157

sykianaki1 10d04
02. 05. 2008
0 views

sykianaki1 10d04

fraseri
02. 05. 2008
0 views

fraseri

ORNISBGCore2007
05. 02. 2008
0 views

ORNISBGCore2007

agriscience basic ag awarness
24. 01. 2008
0 views

agriscience basic ag awarness

Community Greening Training
10. 03. 2008
0 views

Community Greening Training

introToIR
17. 01. 2008
0 views

introToIR

ingels 160305
24. 01. 2008
0 views

ingels 160305

Delhot
10. 01. 2008
0 views

Delhot

olimpic games
14. 04. 2008
0 views

olimpic games

mmo 32
05. 03. 2008
0 views

mmo 32

11 04
04. 02. 2008
0 views

11 04

cccarlos
28. 02. 2008
0 views

cccarlos

funding Opps and guidance
21. 01. 2008
0 views

funding Opps and guidance

session 29 a Karen Donnet Jones
17. 01. 2008
0 views

session 29 a Karen Donnet Jones

XueJishan Boulder 2006 11
16. 04. 2008
0 views

XueJishan Boulder 2006 11

Covenant Counseling Presentation
28. 01. 2008
0 views

Covenant Counseling Presentation

LV PERF
20. 02. 2008
0 views

LV PERF

1866 07 E Dalen Geog
17. 01. 2008
0 views

1866 07 E Dalen Geog