Blomqvist

Information about Blomqvist

Published on April 9, 2008

Author: Peppar

Source: authorstream.com

Content

From faith to knowledge?:  From faith to knowledge? Reflections on some prerequisites for evidence-based addiction care in Sweden 10th International Symposium on Substance Abuse Treatment Reforms, ideology and best practise Oslo, 1-3 October 2007 Addiction care in Sweden – some background facts:  Addiction care in Sweden – some background facts New millennium and new prerequisites in the substance use field::  New millennium and new prerequisites in the substance use field: Alcohol: Accession to the EU dismantling of traditio- nal restrictive policy  increasing drinking; perceived need to find alterantives New interest in addiction care - demands for better outcomes and increasing resources Narcotics: Increasing abuse; increasing mortality  ambition to strengthen traditional policy Main strategies::  Main strategies: The development of ”evidence-based practices” - Review of ”effective treatment methods” (RCT-studies; SBU, 2001) - National guidelines for adiction care (NBHW, 2007) More resources for the care of ”heavy” addicts: - Economic incentives to use more coercive care - Local projects to develop ”care chains” Improved documentation The new initiatives: hopes, possibilities - and some problems:  The new initiatives: hopes, possibilities - and some problems Indications that a better knowledge base is needed:  Indications that a better knowledge base is needed Slide7:  ”Not the continuous march of progress in science, but persistent frustration with the lack of progress in fighting alcoholism” (Kettil Bruun, 1971) Shifting therapeutic crazes - “one ‘wonder-cure’ for each decade” (Lindström, 1994) Overarching, economic and political-ideological changes and considerations – “a common solution to different problems” (e.g. Mäkelä et. al., 1981) What has governed the historical succession of efforts to solve addiction problems? Slide8:  1916 – 1950s: Disciplining/ keeping up of social order (the addict as ”dangerous”/morally inferior) 1960s – 1970s: ”The producers’ paradise” (Bergmark & Oscarsson, 1994) (increasing trust in the welfare state and in treatment as a solution to various human troubles; ideological convictions and shifting therapeutic crazes (“anything goes”); culmination of alcohol care) 1980s: ”From ideology to economy” (Blomqvist, 1996). (”marketisation”; buyer/seller-systems; ”offensive drug care”) 1990s: Economic recession; addiction care set aside ”100 years of substance abuse care in Sweden”: How do professionals choose what to do? A vignette study. Exampel 1: type of intervention for five ”cases” ( > 200 professionals at > 30 units ):  How do professionals choose what to do? A vignette study. Exampel 1: type of intervention for five ”cases” ( > 200 professionals at > 30 units ) (Blomqvist & Wallander, 2004) How do professionals choose what to do? A vignette study. Exampel 2: type of treatment for five ”cases”:  How do professionals choose what to do? A vignette study. Exampel 2: type of treatment for five ”cases” (Blomqvist & Wallander, 2004) How do professionals choose what to do? Exampel 3: proportion at each unit that recommended coercion:  How do professionals choose what to do? Exampel 3: proportion at each unit that recommended coercion (Blomqvist & Wallander, 2004) Some conclusions::  Some conclusions: Low professional consensus (ideology; theory; terminology) Differing views on alcohol and drug problems (the drug addict more alien and worse out) Large between-unit differences (what you get depends on where you live) Large within-unit differences (what you get depends on who you meet) Lacking legal security (coercive care) Few ask for the client’s own opinion Everyone is not judged alike – but economy, local traditions, and ideology as important as – or more important than – clients’ needs and whishes The official picture of addiction care:  The official picture of addiction care National Board of Health and Welfare on addiction care (2005): … There are good examples, but … Interventions are often ad hoc and ill planned, and treatment is often interrupted … Intense (but often unsuccesful) treatment attemps alterante with long periods without support … Relapse seems to be the standard outcome of fragmented interventions Evidence-based practice guidelines – some pros and cons :  Evidence-based practice guidelines – some pros and cons Arguments in favour of EBP::  Arguments in favour of EBP: Humanism: - focus on outcome, not on legislation/procedural rules or on ”filling beds” (clients’ welfare, rather than staff’s comfort or safety) Certainty: - focus on facts, not personal convictions or beliefs (what actually works, rather than guesswork or ”sunshine stories”) Utility, economic rationality: - tax payers can’t afford that money are spent on activities that do not effectively solve the problems in question Swedish National guidelines (2007) – brief summary::  Swedish National guidelines (2007) – brief summary: Alcohol : Psycho-social treatment: 12-step program (manual based) CBT (focus on drinking) Community Reiforcement Approach Brief interv./Motivational interview. Interactional therapy Dynamic therapy Family therapy (focus on drinking) Behav.ther. + ind. adapted support (”heavy abusers”) Pharmacological treatment: Acramprosate/naltrexone (+ psychother.) (+ antabuse, controlled adm.) Should not be used: ”unspecific support” ear acupuncture antabuse (uncontrolled; implants) Drugs: Psycho-social treatment: CBT (cocain) abstention/cognitive training (cannabis) General: same methods as for alcohol (evidence disputed) Pharmacological treatment: Methadone and buprenorphine (opiates; comb. with psycho-social treatment) Antabuse (cocaine) Should not be used: ”unspecific support” No RCTs of treatment of amphetamine abuse No superior method – but no clear support for any ”matching” strategy either Actual vs. recommended methods in Swedish addiction care (National guidelines, 2007 vs. national inventory, 2005):  Actual vs. recommended methods in Swedish addiction care (National guidelines, 2007 vs. national inventory, 2005) Social skills training (32 %) Ego-strengthening therapy / suport (31 %) 12-step treatment / Minnesota model (25 %) Cognitive behavior therapy (19 %) Solution-focused treatment (16 %) Social-pedagogical model (responsibility training) (11 %) Motivational interviewing (10 %) System-theoretical model (10 %) Behavior therapy (10 %) Acupuncture ( 9 %) ………………… Community Reinforcement Approach – CRA ( 1 %) ……………….. About 1/3 of all units offer medicine-assisted treatment Slide18:  RCTs useful /needed for: Valid causal inferences Discarding of ineffective and harmful methods Basis for resource allocation - aggregate level However: The most practiced metods have not been studied in RCTs (what is ”unspecific support”?) Ever-changing knowledge base (guidelines may be obsolete before publishing) Moderate effects; control groups change as well Results at group level not necessarily valid at individual level (but we know little about what is best for whom) ”Method” explains only part of the outcome variance Limited external validity (only treated persons; selection and standardization of therapies, therapists, clients) Short-term consequences of time-limited interventions (but what happens before, outside of, and after the treatment is also important) Slide19:  (Lambert et al., 1992) Dividing the outcome variance pie Who are the clients?:  Who are the clients? ”A goup of social outcasts” (The state of temperance care; 1967) The proportion of marginalised persons in in-patient addiction care increased considerably from 1983 to 1993 (Blomqvist, 1996) - Clients in social services based addiction care in Stockholm: 74 % men; 79 % single; 85 % not in work; 54 % no permanent housing; 38 % primary school at most; 6 % not treated before (Eriksson et.al., 2003) Clients in health care based dependence care in Stockholm: 70 % men; 73 % single; 77 % not in work; 35 % no permanent housing; 30 % primary school at most; 9 % not treated before (Palm & Storbjörk, 2003) Previous treatment experience and external pressure - rather than severity of drinking – main predictors for being in alcoholism treatment (Storbjörk & Room, 2006) Heterogenous problems: who have been studied and who are treated?:  Heterogenous problems: who have been studied and who are treated? RCT-studies Addiction care Slide22:  Previous drinking: ”Problem consumer” Dependent (ICD-10) Present drinking: How important is treatment? (Blomqvist et al., 2007) Proportion who improved their drinking habits without treatment; representative population sample; N= 339/ 2862 ”Risk consumer” ”Moderate” Abstainer 94 % 90 % 85 % 55 % 72 % 48 % 83 % 44 % 28 % ”Normal” Swedish addiction care in sum::  Swedish addiction care in sum: Rather limited role in ”curing” addiction problems Large resources are spent on a small group with severe social and psychological problems, who turn up repeatedly Persons with less severe problems / earlier stages / with better social resources are not reached by / reluctant to contact the treatment system (low availability / fear of stigmatisation /low confidence in existing treatment) Low professional consensus and little collegial dialogue (what you get depends on where you live and who you meet) Local traditions, economy and ideology mean as much as – or more than – research-based knowledge / documented experience EBP in a wider perspective :  EBP in a wider perspective The challenge::  The challenge: The official/manifest goal: to make people stop using narcotic drugs and (ab)using alcohol (Government action plans on alcohol and drugs) The actual / latent goals: Diminishing suffering & mortalilty /creating more tolerable life conditions/ relieve some pressure from relatives and friends (Lindström, 1994) ”Controling the uncontrolable” (Bergmark & Oscarsson, 1988) Assisting society in ”living with its addicts” (Kühlhorn, 1983) Given that both aims are legitimate, what could and should be done to adapt what is done to variegated and heterogenous needs in a variegated and heterogenous group of people with a variety of addiction problems? 1. Facilitating self change / helping people help themselves:  1. Facilitating self change / helping people help themselves Counteract moralism and simplistic categorisations. See addiction as a life style problem / ”environmentally responsive behavioral health problem” Teaching that self-change is possible and how the environemt may help ( about ¼ has someone close who had an alcohol problem; 1/10 tried to help; Blomqvist, 2006) Options to evaluate own consumption habits / easily available advise / reliable self-help materials (web sites, telephone ”help lines” a s o) Encouraging different kinds of ”mutual help”- and support groups Easily accessible / brief / attractive forms of support (no clear border between ”self change” and ”treatment”) Social policy interventions to create sound alternatives (Blomqvist, 2006; Blomqvist et al., 2007) 2. Making services attractive and relevant to the large majority of problem users:  2. Making services attractive and relevant to the large majority of problem users High availabilty / support on demand (”motivation is perishable goods”) ”Start where the individual is” Assessment/planning/choice of intervention in dialouge with the client ”To each according to his needs” – not ready-made ”care chains” (specific or global interventions; assessment/brief advise/treatment/long-term support) Continuous follow-up/revision of plans - in dialouge with the client Broad menue of approved methods and supportive interventions Cross-disciplinary team (”bio-psycho-social”; joint organisation?) Co-operation with the environment (other help systems; ”natural healing forces”) (Blomqvist, 2003) 3. Improving the situation of the ”heavy” addicts or ”chronic cases” – do we need new resources or new ways of thinking?:  3. Improving the situation of the ”heavy” addicts or ”chronic cases” – do we need new resources or new ways of thinking? Some points of departure: Continuity is crucial: long-term problem require long-term support No evidence for the benefits of long-term coercive care No intervention is as influential as ”the natural environment” Own choice → stronger committement / positive expectations → better outcome Good relation / working alliance is crucial Less intense consumption / improved life quality is acceptable goal ”From intensity to extensity”: Rather than irregular, intense, and often interrupted interventions (coercive institutions, treatment homes a s o): continuous, less intense contact (”generic counselor”; personal ”ombud”) – varying forms of support when needed, mobilisation/strengthening of ”healing forces” in each person’s life context; swift and adequate interventions in ”acute” situations (Humphreys & Tucker, 2002; Blomqvist et.al. 2007) Three interpretations of EBP::  Three interpretations of EBP: The informed practitioner – consulting research data bases for each individual case The guidelines-directed and manual-abiding practitioner The pragmatic practitioner – trying to balance scientific evidence, well-documented clinical experience, and clients’ needs and whishes (cf. Sacket et al., 1997) How to keep the learning process going? Slide30:  Can the informed practitioner’s strive for certainty lead to blind faith? Ever new studies  increased transparency  increased uncertainty  new beliefs? Doe’s the manual-abiding practitioner work in the client’s interest? Is it more humane to abide by the letter of the manual than by the letter of the law? ”Technicalisation” may lead to dehumanisation (Bauman on Milgram) Potential paradoxes: Developing a basis of well-documented clinical experience and professional consensus ::  Developing a basis of well-documented clinical experience and professional consensus : Systematic documentation – follow-up – collegial dialouge at the practice level Research needs: More controlled outcome studies (real life treatment methods/techniques) More studies of the treatment process and ”common factors” (e.g., more knowledge about the role of faith in recovery) More long-term, naturalistic studies; user’s perspective; organizational aspects, a s o Putting the single client i focus: Keeping track of the development of the single case (corrections / adaptions to new circumstances / increased motivation / better outcome) How to strike the balance? Slide32:  On the move from ”faith” towards ”knowledge”: (bridging the gap between research and practice) Research: contribute ’abstract’ knowledge (causes; methods; principles) (advise practice on documentation and self-scrutiny) Practice: (translate and adapt abstract knowledge to shifting concrete circumstances) Scrutinise, articulate and systematise own experiences … in dialouge with users/clients… and… on-going ethical discussion

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Peppar

Financial Statement Analysis
10. 04. 2008
0 views

Financial Statement Analysis

Dr PH Presentation
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Dr PH Presentation

Burj Al Arab
22. 04. 2008
0 views

Burj Al Arab

cd4 hiv dr a singh
17. 04. 2008
0 views

cd4 hiv dr a singh

Philip Scott
17. 04. 2008
0 views

Philip Scott

RMIT 25July01 Pres
14. 04. 2008
0 views

RMIT 25July01 Pres

060125
13. 04. 2008
0 views

060125

Rocks and Weathering
20. 09. 2007
0 views

Rocks and Weathering

Your First RSS Feed
29. 09. 2007
0 views

Your First RSS Feed

Switzerland
15. 10. 2007
0 views

Switzerland

t infantil y legislacion
22. 10. 2007
0 views

t infantil y legislacion

14501
07. 10. 2007
0 views

14501

MAHA Talk
29. 10. 2007
0 views

MAHA Talk

Stylish Sentences
02. 11. 2007
0 views

Stylish Sentences

15 GardnerHarris
19. 11. 2007
0 views

15 GardnerHarris

cryptorchidism
19. 11. 2007
0 views

cryptorchidism

geometry and art P2
22. 11. 2007
0 views

geometry and art P2

Green Bldgs and WQ
31. 12. 2007
0 views

Green Bldgs and WQ

paper2
03. 01. 2008
0 views

paper2

Earthquakes Chap 5
20. 09. 2007
0 views

Earthquakes Chap 5

Ch08
20. 09. 2007
0 views

Ch08

El Paso Electric lowres pics
07. 08. 2007
0 views

El Paso Electric lowres pics

AG presentation Infrastructure
07. 08. 2007
0 views

AG presentation Infrastructure

GCRA Presentation 2005 1
07. 08. 2007
0 views

GCRA Presentation 2005 1

Asian Alphabet Book 04 17 06
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Asian Alphabet Book 04 17 06

pres maldives
07. 08. 2007
0 views

pres maldives

Tsunami Effects
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Tsunami Effects

Maldives
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Maldives

Global gs pp 0207
22. 10. 2007
0 views

Global gs pp 0207

feist ch14McCrae
06. 08. 2007
0 views

feist ch14McCrae

measurement and geometry
07. 08. 2007
0 views

measurement and geometry

arguments
15. 11. 2007
0 views

arguments

Tidal Energy Overview7
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Tidal Energy Overview7

camoa presse spip 01
07. 08. 2007
0 views

camoa presse spip 01

PE Rocks Igneous
20. 09. 2007
0 views

PE Rocks Igneous

ROCKS and how to identify them
20. 09. 2007
0 views

ROCKS and how to identify them

RIPARWIN Presentation
03. 01. 2008
0 views

RIPARWIN Presentation

ioag9 jaxa briefing
03. 01. 2008
0 views

ioag9 jaxa briefing

social structure
19. 02. 2008
0 views

social structure

investing in the future
04. 03. 2008
0 views

investing in the future

Secondary Math Handout
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Secondary Math Handout

Roundtable
26. 10. 2007
0 views

Roundtable

NicholasEberstadt
15. 10. 2007
0 views

NicholasEberstadt

YTB 052007
12. 03. 2008
0 views

YTB 052007

raicevic
18. 03. 2008
0 views

raicevic

sbp 07
25. 03. 2008
0 views

sbp 07

purchasing sp presentation
20. 09. 2007
0 views

purchasing sp presentation

CSAPA Awareness2005
07. 08. 2007
0 views

CSAPA Awareness2005

FinalReport
22. 10. 2007
0 views

FinalReport

IJCDlineNojiri
09. 10. 2007
0 views

IJCDlineNojiri

DFT KeyChallengesNicNewm an
05. 10. 2007
0 views

DFT KeyChallengesNicNewm an

ILejarraga
07. 08. 2007
0 views

ILejarraga

EP Tecon 0405
19. 06. 2007
0 views

EP Tecon 0405

famigliaim presaanto 3
18. 06. 2007
0 views

famigliaim presaanto 3

Bulldogs Best Books 1211
18. 06. 2007
0 views

Bulldogs Best Books 1211

btw e 008 moriresearch
18. 06. 2007
0 views

btw e 008 moriresearch

BPL Sanyo JV Pressrelease
18. 06. 2007
0 views

BPL Sanyo JV Pressrelease

bite overview
18. 06. 2007
0 views

bite overview

biogas
18. 06. 2007
0 views

biogas

BILBAO
18. 06. 2007
0 views

BILBAO

Benef oport
18. 06. 2007
0 views

Benef oport

formazrete
18. 06. 2007
0 views

formazrete

lect 4 1113 Class Ig Rx1
20. 09. 2007
0 views

lect 4 1113 Class Ig Rx1

ebs2 elearn07
19. 06. 2007
0 views

ebs2 elearn07

boiron
18. 06. 2007
0 views

boiron

fiscal
18. 06. 2007
0 views

fiscal

12 productivity quiz
16. 06. 2007
0 views

12 productivity quiz

10 1
16. 06. 2007
0 views

10 1

215 Pics With Captions
16. 06. 2007
0 views

215 Pics With Captions

2007 Power Stroke
16. 06. 2007
0 views

2007 Power Stroke

20070422
16. 06. 2007
0 views

20070422

20070225
16. 06. 2007
0 views

20070225

2005AM LC 2C
16. 06. 2007
0 views

2005AM LC 2C

2004 4082OPH1 01 Tiefer
16. 06. 2007
0 views

2004 4082OPH1 01 Tiefer

1kanrap
16. 06. 2007
0 views

1kanrap

1kanpres
16. 06. 2007
0 views

1kanpres

1kanintro
16. 06. 2007
0 views

1kanintro

1kancom
16. 06. 2007
0 views

1kancom

19 Flake 071706
16. 06. 2007
0 views

19 Flake 071706

OIF Presentation Final Sept07
05. 01. 2008
0 views

OIF Presentation Final Sept07

12nightacts
16. 06. 2007
0 views

12nightacts

Fri 0830 RegionalAQ liao 1 pc
16. 10. 2007
0 views

Fri 0830 RegionalAQ liao 1 pc

bullismo
18. 06. 2007
0 views

bullismo

ARVs friends or foes McCoy
28. 12. 2007
0 views

ARVs friends or foes McCoy

Rock types silica sat
20. 09. 2007
0 views

Rock types silica sat

Threats to our Water
29. 02. 2008
0 views

Threats to our Water

SIVplanmeet svg3c Shakir
07. 08. 2007
0 views

SIVplanmeet svg3c Shakir

Rajesh Mehta
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Rajesh Mehta

FER 9 und 20
18. 06. 2007
0 views

FER 9 und 20

georgevidor
16. 11. 2007
0 views

georgevidor

beo presentation
18. 06. 2007
0 views

beo presentation

EVACAR Otesis
18. 06. 2007
0 views

EVACAR Otesis

Calvin Dude
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Calvin Dude

PRACTICAL4
29. 12. 2007
0 views

PRACTICAL4

cuamcfarland
20. 09. 2007
0 views

cuamcfarland

UHART
24. 11. 2007
0 views

UHART

News CIRIA document
01. 01. 2008
0 views

News CIRIA document

EverythingDigital
07. 08. 2007
0 views

EverythingDigital

ntra Master B
23. 10. 2007
0 views

ntra Master B

FSGDevCon20060419
15. 11. 2007
0 views

FSGDevCon20060419

Context06
15. 10. 2007
0 views

Context06

4 brittle I
20. 09. 2007
0 views

4 brittle I

WBTi
07. 08. 2007
0 views

WBTi

BTSA Technology Bytes
18. 06. 2007
0 views

BTSA Technology Bytes

FCP05 PD Flaum
06. 08. 2007
0 views

FCP05 PD Flaum

14 20H 10 1103 Dr SEARO
07. 08. 2007
0 views

14 20H 10 1103 Dr SEARO

echt Zeit
19. 06. 2007
0 views

echt Zeit

dortmund
19. 06. 2007
0 views

dortmund