conformity

Information about conformity

Published on December 11, 2007

Author: Churchill

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience:  Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience Slide2:  Close your eyes and think about anything that you want. Keep them closed until I ask you to open them. Conformity:  Conformity the tendency to change our perceptions, opinions, and/or behaviors in ways that are consistent with social norms Conformity:  Conformity don’t stand too close to people don’t talk to other people in an elevator do say “Please” and “Thank you” Conformity:  Conformity two basic types of conformity public conformity private conformity Conformity:  Conformity autokinetic effect observed light alone observed light in a group asked to estimate again in private (Sherif, 1936) Conformity:  Conformity autokinetic effect final estimate closer to group’s estimate than the original in ambiguous situations, people tend to be suggestible private conformity (Sherif, 1936) Conformity:  Conformity epidemic psychogenic illness (EPI) illustrates two things: group norms can be subtle, yet very powerful ambiguity = more susceptibility to conformity Conformity:  Conformity conformity in unambiguous situations groups of 8 confederates erred on 12 of 18 judgments 37% conformed (only 1% error rate in private) public conformity (Asch 1951, 1956) Conformity:  Conformity subsequent studies group size influences conformity ally dissenter decreases conformity by 80% (Asch 1951, 1956) Conformity:  Conformity two reasons for conformity normative social influence (public conformity) want to “fit in”; don’t want to be deviant e.g., teenagers, REP sign-up sheet Conformity:  Conformity two reasons for conformity informational social influence (private conformity) ambiguous situation, we look to others e.g., new bus route Conformity:  Conformity extra credit opportunity choose a social norm and violate it write-up due next Monday (3/28) describe how you violated a social norm How did others respond to your norm violation? How did the norm violation make you feel? nothing illegal do not implicate me or my family Compliance:  Compliance changes in behavior that are elicited by direct requests Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence tap into our automatic processes compliance professionals use this processing to their advantage (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence reciprocation: repay in kind what another person has given us powerful and pervasive (cross-culturally) (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence reciprocation study of “art appreciation”; done in pairs IV: likable/not likable and Coke/no Coke DV: # of raffle tickets (Regan, 1971) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence reciprocation Coke condition bought more raffle tickets liking did not matter (Regan, 1971) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence reciprocation door-in-the-face technique: real request is prefaced by one so large that it is rejected; real request seen as a concession Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence reciprocation “County Youth Counseling Program” supervising 2 hours at the zoo -- 17% agreed 2 hrs/wk for 2 years as a counselor -- 0 agreed then the same zoo request -- 50% agreed (Cialdini et al., 1975) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence commitment and consistency: taps our strong desire to be consistent over time “Foolish consistency is the hobgoblins of little minds.” Ralph Waldo Emerson (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence commitment and consistency foot-in-the-door technique: real request is preceded by first getting compliance with a much smaller request Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence commitment and consistency questions about household products 3 days later asked to allow an inventory of their household products (Freedman & Fraser, 1966) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence commitment and consistency initially answered questions -- 53% agreed not asked questions -- 22% agreed (Freedman & Fraser, 1966) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence commitment and consistency California homeowners asked to display a 3-inch square sign that read “Be a Safe Driver” 2 weeks later: display a PSA billboard in the front lawn that read “Drive Carefully” (Freedman & Fraser, 1966) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence commitment and consistency only asked to display billboard -- 17% complied asked first and second request -- 76% complied (Freedman & Fraser, 1966) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence commitment and consistency low-balling: secure agreement with a request, but then increase the size of the request by revealing hidden costs e.g., used car salesman Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence commitment and consistency low-balling Why does it work? Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence social proof: the situation may be fabricated to influence you to act in a certain way (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence social proof works best in ambiguous situations e.g., door-to-door salesman, bartenders, Three-Card Monty Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence liking: people are more persuasive the more we like them and the more similar they are to us (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence liking physical attractiveness what-is-beautiful-is-good stereotype Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence liking physical attractiveness similarity Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence liking physical attractiveness similarity complementary people Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence The Tupperware Party one starts every 2.7 seconds $2.5 million/day -- almost $1 billion/year (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence The Tupperware Party reciprocity prizes and grab bags (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence The Tupperware Party reciprocity commitment and consistency talk about the usefulness of Tupperware products (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence The Tupperware Party reciprocity commitment and consistency social proof order forms passed around (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence The Tupperware Party reciprocity commitment and consistency social proof liking house of a friend or acquaintance (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence authority: we tend to have an automatic response to authorities (i.e., a heuristic) (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence authority effect of people’s clothing on others willingness to comply “You see that guy over there by the meter? He’s over-parked and doesn’t have any change. Give him a dime!” plain clothing or security guard Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence authority exploited in advertising “4 out of 5 dentists recommend…” “9 out of 10 doctors prefer…” Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence scarcity: arouses a threat to our personal autonomy to control and make decisions (Cialdini, 2000) Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence scarcity Dade County, Florida -- ban on cleaning products containing phosphates “soap caravans”; 20-year supplies phosphate detergents: rated more gentle, more powerful on stains, more easily pourable Weapons of Social Influence:  Weapons of Social Influence scarcity banned books or movies Beanie Babies/Cabbage Patch Kids Home Shopping Network Obedience:  Obedience an act in response to a request from authority Obedience:  Obedience Milgram studies Pay attention to the factors that affect the influence of the authority figure and the obedience of the participants. Obedience:  Obedience Milgram studies social class, education, nor gender has a significant effect on participants’ obedience the effects lie in the situation Obedience:  Obedience Milgram studies requirement of informed consent development of Institutional Review Boards debate about the use of deception in psychology Conclusion:  Conclusion conformity occurs in response to social norms social norms are pervasive and powerful compliance occurs in response to a direct request obedience occurs in response to an authority figure Next Time:  Next Time How do social psychologists’ understand stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination?

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Churchill

GIS Forest
07. 01. 2008
0 views

GIS Forest

georgia
21. 11. 2007
0 views

georgia

nasulec iso
28. 11. 2007
0 views

nasulec iso

Sachio SEMMOTO EACCESS
28. 11. 2007
0 views

Sachio SEMMOTO EACCESS

Black
30. 11. 2007
0 views

Black

Kelly ASCO
10. 12. 2007
0 views

Kelly ASCO

H106m
12. 12. 2007
0 views

H106m

alisonBates
30. 10. 2007
0 views

alisonBates

MI Direct Shipment Meeting
06. 11. 2007
0 views

MI Direct Shipment Meeting

CUPA 2007 Adv HW part 1 POG
12. 11. 2007
0 views

CUPA 2007 Adv HW part 1 POG

physics121 lecture09
14. 11. 2007
0 views

physics121 lecture09

xray gamma neutrino
15. 11. 2007
0 views

xray gamma neutrino

02 UMLS 004
20. 11. 2007
0 views

02 UMLS 004

cll les types de langues 1
19. 11. 2007
0 views

cll les types de langues 1

Clean Air Manhattan
14. 12. 2007
0 views

Clean Air Manhattan

DSL BRodey
28. 11. 2007
0 views

DSL BRodey

lex mexico pnc rev
06. 12. 2007
0 views

lex mexico pnc rev

Prep Powerpoint Sample
07. 12. 2007
0 views

Prep Powerpoint Sample

VLANs
03. 01. 2008
0 views

VLANs

Bolting Welding1
04. 01. 2008
0 views

Bolting Welding1

Paterson
04. 01. 2008
0 views

Paterson

HANDOUT01 NGMA
07. 01. 2008
0 views

HANDOUT01 NGMA

Doubledee 8 6 06
29. 10. 2007
0 views

Doubledee 8 6 06

EHESSpart2
01. 11. 2007
0 views

EHESSpart2

Perch School 2006 Feed Training
07. 11. 2007
0 views

Perch School 2006 Feed Training

niv hachlili myimaginarydiary
03. 10. 2007
0 views

niv hachlili myimaginarydiary

archeappl
09. 10. 2007
0 views

archeappl

ROVIRA Joan
24. 02. 2008
0 views

ROVIRA Joan

techtime
27. 02. 2008
0 views

techtime

NKOS 2003
05. 12. 2007
0 views

NKOS 2003

australia sugar
28. 12. 2007
0 views

australia sugar

Korea Mobile
27. 03. 2008
0 views

Korea Mobile

SASC1
13. 04. 2008
0 views

SASC1

Peterson
26. 10. 2007
0 views

Peterson

bt presentation 34
16. 11. 2007
0 views

bt presentation 34

seetso restructuring
31. 10. 2007
0 views

seetso restructuring

Moller log Feet
14. 11. 2007
0 views

Moller log Feet

Walter Chambati
30. 12. 2007
0 views

Walter Chambati

G1 3MauricioBrena
15. 11. 2007
0 views

G1 3MauricioBrena

Historia bankowoxci internetowej
16. 11. 2007
0 views

Historia bankowoxci internetowej

ecllo040721
01. 12. 2007
0 views

ecllo040721

Rise to Power
31. 10. 2007
0 views

Rise to Power

01 Exam1 Material Part 1
13. 11. 2007
0 views

01 Exam1 Material Part 1

mangrove
02. 01. 2008
0 views

mangrove