crcagu03

Information about crcagu03

Published on April 10, 2008

Author: Wanderer

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Slide1:  Clark R. Chapman Southwest Research Inst. Boulder, Colorado, USA AGU Fall Meeting San Francisco 9 December 2003 Consequences of Predicted or Actual Asteroid Impacts Session U22B: “Estimating the Consequences of Severe Geophysical Events” http://www.boulder.swri.edu/clark/clark.html In the Post 9/11 World...:  In the Post 9/11 World... What are the potential consequences of the remote threat of an asteroid impact catastrophe? The Hazard from Asteroids and Comets: Introduction:  The Hazard from Asteroids and Comets: Introduction The Earth encounters interplanetary projectiles, ranging from (a) tiny, harm- less ones to (b) gigantic, destructive ones…(the big ones hit very rarely). This is a newly recognized threat Comet fears…Watson, Baldwin, Opik (NEAs,1950s) Shoemaker/Meteor Crater…Mariner spacecraft Alvarez et al. K-T Boundary hypothesis/Chicxulub Spaceguard NEA “near misses”/disaster movies This extreme example of a natural disaster (tiny chances of happening, but with huge consequences) challenges a rational response by citizens and policy-makers. The Little Prince Meteorite punctured roof in Canon City, CO Global catastrophe Asteroid B612 What Do We Know About the Impact Hazard? :  What Do We Know About the Impact Hazard? How many asteroids and comets there are of various sizes in Earth-approaching orbits (~1100 > 1 km diam.) So impact frequencies are known. How much energy is delivered by an impact (e.g. the TNT equivalence, size of resulting crater). How much dust is raised into the stratosphere and other environmental consequences. Biosphere response (agriculture, forests, human beings, ocean life) to environmental shock. Response of human psychology, sociology, political systems, and economies to such a catastrophe. Sept. 11th? NE USA 2003 Blackout? WE KNOW THIS… Very Poorly Somewhat Very Well Very Well Sizes, Impact Frequencies of NEOs:  Sizes, Impact Frequencies of NEOs Dust Boulder Building Mountain Second Week Millennium 500,000 yr 100 Myr Leonid meteor shower Peekskill meteorite Tunguska, 1908 SL9 hits Jupiter 1994 K-T mass extinctor, 65 Myr ago Smallest, most frequent Huge, extremely rare 15 km Asteroid Size Distribution: How Often Impacts of Different Energies Happen:  Asteroid Size Distribution: How Often Impacts of Different Energies Happen Courtesy Al Harris Risk vs. Scale of Impact (Chapman & Morrison 1994):  Tsunami Stratospheric Dust Risk vs. Scale of Impact (Chapman & Morrison 1994) Annual fatalities peak for events near the global “threshold size”, about 2 km Orange/yellow zone illustrates our range of uncertainties for agricultural disaster due to stratospheric dust Tsunami risk very uncertain NASA Re-evaluation of Risk (NEO Science Definition Team, August 2003):  NASA Re-evaluation of Risk (NEO Science Definition Team, August 2003) NEO population estimates Residual impact hazard (after Spaceguard finds 90% of NEAs >1 km diameter, 2008) Candidate technologies and search strategies (ground-based & space-based) to retire more of the risk (by identifying objects that won’t hit, or one that will) Cost-benefit analysis Recommendation: Extend survey to discover 90% of Potentially Hazardous Objects >140 m diameter, in a ~$300 million program taking 7 to 20 years beginning in 2008. Statistical global mortality would drop from 300 to 30 deaths per year. Deaths due to Land Hazard, Tsunami Hazard, Global Hazard:  Deaths due to Land Hazard, Tsunami Hazard, Global Hazard “People Affected” Annually Deaths for land and global Tsunami inundation Maximum, Nominal, Minimum Comets < 1% of Hazard: it’s NEAs! Overall vs. Residual Hazard (after SG) Deaths are ~10% of people affected by tsunami 0.04 km 1 km 8 km 0.04 km 1 km 8 km 0.04 km 1 km 8 km 0 0 0 800 60 6 16 Overall Impact Hazard:  Overall Impact Hazard Total impact hazard is dominated by global catastrophes…but Spaceguard is finding most NEAs >1 km diam., so residual hazard will soon be dominated by 60-600 m NEAs Dividing tsunami risk by 10, residual risk is: 33% from land impacts (60 – 200 m diam.) 10% from tsunami (asteroids 150–600 m diam.) 57% from global catastrophes (1-2 km diam.) Statistical annual worldwide mortality: 36 minimum estimate 155 nominal estimate 813 maximum estimate Numbers in official table (left) weigh property damage from tsunami more heavily (Comparable with airliner fatalities) Chances from Dying from Selected Causes (for U.S.A.) :  Chances from Dying from Selected Causes (for U.S.A.) By terrorism (mostly due to Sept. 11th attacks) Fatality Rates Compared with Accidents and Natural Hazards:  Fatality Rates Compared with Accidents and Natural Hazards 20th Century Catastrophes: We have much more to worry about! :  20th Century Catastrophes: We have much more to worry about! Averaged over long durations, the death rate expected from impacts is similar to that from volcanoes. What Can We Do about This Hazard? What Are We Doing about It?:  What Can We Do about This Hazard? What Are We Doing about It? We can use telescopes to search for asteroids and comets that might be on a collision course with Earth during this century (e.g. Spaceguard Survey) NASA report proposes extension to 140 m If one is found (among all those that we can certify as not a threat), then we could mitigate (evacuate, amass food supplies, move the asteroid so it won’t hit, etc.) Low-thrust propulsion (e.g. B612 demo. project) could deflect NEA away from us See Schweickart et al., Nov. 2003 Scientific American “Of no practical concern…”:  “Of no practical concern…” I will de-emphasize the extremes… OBJECTS SMALLER THAN A FEW METERS ACROSS they can damage satellites in space, but have no practical consequences on the ground, are essentially harmless (when they cause minor harm, they make headlines) OBJECTS LARGER THAN A FEW KM IN SIZE these are philosophically important: they have shaped evolution of life on Earth (mammals arose from the dinosaurs’ demise); another such impact could eradicate the human species BUT the chances are extremely remote of such an impact in our lives; there’s little we could do in advance to protect ourselves from the resulting holocaust, anyway So my Case Studies concern a broad mid-range, several meters to several km diam. But YOU may disagree! Impacts of Practical Concern:  Impacts of Practical Concern Case Studies of Potential Impact Disasters (abridged from my OECD study):  Case Studies of Potential Impact Disasters (abridged from my OECD study) Nature of Devastation. Probability of Happening, in 21st century. Warning Time. Possibilities for Post-Warning Mitigation. After-Event Disaster Management. Advance Preparation. What can we do now? Three case studies, exemplifying the different sizes and types of impact disasters, are discussed in these terms: A. Civilization-Destroyer: 2-3 km Asteroid or Comet Impact:  A. Civilization-Destroyer: 2-3 km Asteroid or Comet Impact Nature of Devastation. A million MT explosion, global climate catastrophe, growing season is lost worldwide. Firestorm the size of India. Ozone layer destroyed. No nation spared severe consequences. Compound effects threaten civilization by collapse of social/economic institutions. Billions might die. (Unprecedented, so predictions uncertain.) Probability of Happening. Most 2-3 km bodies are known and will NOT hit soon. Residual ones have ~1-in-100,000 chance of striking in 21st century. Warning Time. If an asteroid, decades; if a comet, few months. Possibilities for Post-Warning Mitigation. Discovered years to decades in advance. Deflection would avert disaster, but very technically challenging for such a big object. If warning time is too short (or deflection fails). Mass evacuation of sector near ground zero; production/storage of food and other preparations for crisis; hardening of susceptible infrastructure (communications, transportation, medical services). Extraordinarily challenging; ineffective if warning time were only months. Case A, (continued). Civilization-Destroyer: 2-3 km Asteroid or Comet Impact:  Case A, (continued). Civilization-Destroyer: 2-3 km Asteroid or Comet Impact After-Event Disaster Management. Wholly unprecedented. History (Dark Ages, Plague) or fiction (e.g. “Lucifer’s Hammer”) provide best perspectives. Advance Preparation. Considering such an extreme case encourages“out-of-the-box” thinking about other unanticipated future crises. Deflection would be so challenging, advance work (e.g. learning how to move a smaller asteroid) would be good preparation. In normal international disaster planning and coordination, extra effort at the margins to consider such an apocalyptic horror might define the outer-envelope of contingencies. B. “Mini-Tunguska”: Once-in-a-Century Atmospheric Explosion:  B. “Mini-Tunguska”: Once-in-a-Century Atmospheric Explosion Nature of Devastation. 30-40 m “office building” rock hits at 100 times speed of jetliner, explodes ~15 km up with energy of 100 Hiroshima A-bombs. Weak structures damaged/destroyed by hurricane-force winds out to 20 km. Hundreds die; mostly in poor, densely populated areas (minimal damage in desolate places). Probability of Happening. Once-a-century, but most likely over an ocean or sparsely-populated area. Warning Time. Very unlikely to be seen beforehand; no warning at all. Mitigation Issues. Little can be done in advance (an adequate search system would be very costly). Rescue and recovery would resemble responses to a “normal” civil disaster. No on-the-ground advance preparation makes sense, except public education about this possibility. C. Prediction (or Media Report) of Near-Term Impact Possibility:  C. Prediction (or Media Report) of Near-Term Impact Possibility Nature of the Problem. Mistaken or exaggerated media report (near-miss, near-term “predicted” impact, etc.) causes panic, demands for official “action”. Probability of Happening. Already happened! Certain to happen again soon. This is the most likely way for the impact hazard to become of urgent concern to public officials. Warning Time. Page-one stories develop in hours; officials totally surprised. Mitigation Issues. Public education in science, critical thinking, and about risk, in particular. Science education and journalism need much improvement. Case C, (continued). Prediction (or Media Report) of Near-Term Impact Possibility:  Case C, (continued). Prediction (or Media Report) of Near-Term Impact Possibility Actual “near miss” by >100 m asteroid, “just” 60,000 km from Earth. Will people believe official statements it will miss? Reputable but mistaken astronomer predicts huge impact will occur on, say, 1 April 2017 in a specific country; report not withdrawn for few days; panic results. Official IAU prediction of 1-in-few-hundred impact possibility later in century (Torino Scale = 2); not refined for months. Grotesque media hype of one of above cases or other innocuous fact (3 cases last year) Examples LESSON: Perception drives the most likely consequences! Public Perception:  Public Perception While “known” to many from movies and the news, a serious impact disaster has never been experienced in recorded history. The tiny chances, huge consequences are extremely difficult for people to relate to (building in 100 year floodplains.) The impact hazard is “dreadful” (fatal, uncontrollable, involuntary, catastrophic, increasing…) and apocalyptic (with religious or superstitious implications for many). Public response to a real impending impact is expected to be exaggerated (e.g. Skylab falling, or 9/11). Odds of a “Royal Flush” (1 in 649,739) are like chances of a mile-wide asteroid striking next year! Hazard Scales: The Challenge of Simply Communicating Risk to Citizens:  Hazard Scales: The Challenge of Simply Communicating Risk to Citizens The well-known Richter Scale has been refined over decades. Americans wrestled this spring with how to deal with “orange”. The Torino Scale has had modest effectiveness, challenges. Richter Scale (Earthquakes) Terrorism Scale Predicted Asteroid Impact Scale Comparisons with other Natural Hazards and with Terrorism:  Comparisons with other Natural Hazards and with Terrorism Similar to Terrorism Threats are new, “dreadful”, poorly understood, raise fears Few have been (or will be) killed, but many could be killed Both strike “randomly”, in place and time Dissimilar from Terrorism Impacts are an “act of God”; terrorism is conscious evil We can do something concrete to deflect an asteroid; battling terrorism is like waging the “war on drugs” We spend a few million on Spaceguard, hundreds of billions to battle terrorists (how much on flu vaccinations?) Similar to Natural Disasters: nature of damage mostly due to familiar forces (fire, high wind, quake, falling debris, flood) Dissimilar from Natural Disasters: impacts happen any-where; no “aftershock” analogs; no radioactivity or enemy soldiers Post-September 11th Insights:  Post-September 11th Insights We’ve “learned” to fear the unexpected in what seems like an ever more risky world -- whether or not it truly is. (Asteroids appear to be an increasing danger, even though they aren’t, due to increasing “near misses”. Terrorism isn’t “increasing” much either: 2544 1983-93 vs 4376 1993-2003.) “Objective” measures of death and damage (e.g. ~3000 deaths and property damage in lower Manhattan) do not begin to predict the nature of public responses and the resulting potential losses (e.g. economic recession). “Who was to blame for not foreseeing this kind of disaster?” (we seek villains in government, for 9/11, for the Columbia disaster…who will be blamed if an asteroid strikes?) Wrapping up the Impact Threat::  Wrapping up the Impact Threat: Its potential consequences are horrific… exceeding any other natural hazard and equalling all-out nuclear war Unlike the dinosaurs, we have the intelligence and technology to avert a threatened impact In a post-September 11th world, it is difficult (for me) to predict public reactions to near-misses, huge-but-low-probability disasters, bombs in space, and other impact hazard issues Predictions of consequences involve psychology/ sociology/politics as much as geophysics The impact hazard is REAL but it is VERY UNLIKELY that a big impact will happen during our lifetimes Asteroid Impact Hazard:  Asteroid Impact Hazard There is an enormous variety of projectiles from interplanetary space that impact the earth. Reading clockwise from the upper left, there are dust grains that create “shooting stars” all the time to the “dinosaur killers” that strike only about once every hundred million years. The table shows the range of threatening impactors of practical concern, ranging from the “civilization destroyer” down to the “harmless” 2 kiloton atmospheric blast, which however could be mistaken for a nuclear attack in a place of international tension. SwRI researchers in Boulder are evaluating the impact hazard and what might be done about it. Impact frequencies and projectile sizes

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Wanderer

RCM2 Ganesan
17. 08. 2007
0 views

RCM2 Ganesan

System Architect
21. 09. 2007
0 views

System Architect

Customer Retention
28. 09. 2007
0 views

Customer Retention

intrusion detection monitoring
07. 10. 2007
0 views

intrusion detection monitoring

baptista
10. 10. 2007
0 views

baptista

YoungEntrepreneurs China
11. 10. 2007
0 views

YoungEntrepreneurs China

presentation proposed programme
12. 10. 2007
0 views

presentation proposed programme

ch19 lecture
12. 10. 2007
0 views

ch19 lecture

balla reinhart F100 1 pres
18. 10. 2007
0 views

balla reinhart F100 1 pres

Erasmus Charte Universitarie
23. 10. 2007
0 views

Erasmus Charte Universitarie

essayformatTHESIS
26. 08. 2007
0 views

essayformatTHESIS

Sharon
26. 08. 2007
0 views

Sharon

7 Panama Esp
22. 10. 2007
0 views

7 Panama Esp

preference
07. 11. 2007
0 views

preference

Go Forth
17. 08. 2007
0 views

Go Forth

sf wireless
29. 10. 2007
0 views

sf wireless

Convulsoes Neonatais e Epilepsia
28. 12. 2007
0 views

Convulsoes Neonatais e Epilepsia

ch7F07govt2302
31. 12. 2007
0 views

ch7F07govt2302

Presidential character
03. 01. 2008
0 views

Presidential character

potma
03. 01. 2008
0 views

potma

Maitland
09. 10. 2007
0 views

Maitland

overweight obesity
08. 08. 2007
0 views

overweight obesity

Minority Stress Gray APA2006
08. 08. 2007
0 views

Minority Stress Gray APA2006

MoAc0304
08. 08. 2007
0 views

MoAc0304

japanese02s gyro
26. 08. 2007
0 views

japanese02s gyro

Bjorn AFCEATTN CDRNeurath
19. 11. 2007
0 views

Bjorn AFCEATTN CDRNeurath

Rosenzweig Presentation
29. 12. 2007
0 views

Rosenzweig Presentation

martin weller lams
20. 07. 2007
0 views

martin weller lams

26221
26. 08. 2007
0 views

26221

NAATPN Presentation
11. 12. 2007
0 views

NAATPN Presentation

D Levy Transp
21. 09. 2007
0 views

D Levy Transp

NicosiaRaymondPawson
26. 08. 2007
0 views

NicosiaRaymondPawson

646family
24. 02. 2008
0 views

646family

AfricanSlaveTrades
26. 02. 2008
0 views

AfricanSlaveTrades

mms 04 13 elearning
27. 06. 2007
0 views

mms 04 13 elearning

Mathematical Moodle final
27. 06. 2007
0 views

Mathematical Moodle final

inbrieffeb07
28. 02. 2008
0 views

inbrieffeb07

LaWeyl
08. 08. 2007
0 views

LaWeyl

hurricane katrina
13. 03. 2008
0 views

hurricane katrina

meaning
27. 11. 2007
0 views

meaning

transparents Berleur
18. 03. 2008
0 views

transparents Berleur

ChinaandJapanPt2
25. 03. 2008
0 views

ChinaandJapanPt2

BroadbandServies
26. 03. 2008
0 views

BroadbandServies

sinclair prc precip
03. 10. 2007
0 views

sinclair prc precip

8 Mru Patel
07. 04. 2008
0 views

8 Mru Patel

COE 9 Jan 06
28. 03. 2008
0 views

COE 9 Jan 06

060928 Energy Challenges Thun
30. 03. 2008
0 views

060928 Energy Challenges Thun

program
27. 11. 2007
0 views

program

adam smith
09. 04. 2008
0 views

adam smith

Susan Wachter
13. 04. 2008
0 views

Susan Wachter

MickLilley MacquarieBank
14. 04. 2008
0 views

MickLilley MacquarieBank

experiencia
19. 06. 2007
0 views

experiencia

Europa desde el Cielo 2126
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Europa desde el Cielo 2126

Estrategia empresarial
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Estrategia empresarial

Estadio Allianz Arena 2125
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Estadio Allianz Arena 2125

Esculturas hechas con Arena 2124
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Esculturas hechas con Arena 2124

sesame
26. 11. 2007
0 views

sesame

pierre danon
22. 04. 2008
0 views

pierre danon

Globos Aerostaticos 2133
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Globos Aerostaticos 2133

Gaturro oficina
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Gaturro oficina

Frases para reflexionar 2131
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Frases para reflexionar 2131

Football
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Football

twilight
26. 08. 2007
0 views

twilight

WW
04. 01. 2008
0 views

WW

EvidenceMatters
19. 06. 2007
0 views

EvidenceMatters

p6 alina
26. 08. 2007
0 views

p6 alina

Fantasia 2042
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Fantasia 2042

older adults nut
08. 08. 2007
0 views

older adults nut

mellange presentation en
27. 06. 2007
0 views

mellange presentation en

SH Presentation Sunny Hills
26. 08. 2007
0 views

SH Presentation Sunny Hills

lecture23
08. 08. 2007
0 views

lecture23

IAFC IndiaPresentation
17. 08. 2007
0 views

IAFC IndiaPresentation

00017079
26. 08. 2007
0 views

00017079

04RandomVariables
07. 12. 2007
0 views

04RandomVariables

Lecture 24 Muhammed and Islam
17. 08. 2007
0 views

Lecture 24 Muhammed and Islam

00 norby
26. 08. 2007
0 views

00 norby

CN7 Learning2
14. 12. 2007
0 views

CN7 Learning2

Fumar Mata
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Fumar Mata

do dont show
16. 06. 2007
0 views

do dont show

Direc TV
16. 06. 2007
0 views

Direc TV

BAM CIDOC 2006 folien
16. 06. 2007
0 views

BAM CIDOC 2006 folien

Dr Anwar1
16. 06. 2007
0 views

Dr Anwar1

biouml gcb 2003
16. 11. 2007
0 views

biouml gcb 2003

PPConference 28 02 07 E Marcova
14. 03. 2008
0 views

PPConference 28 02 07 E Marcova

dominguezhills
26. 08. 2007
0 views

dominguezhills

Festival de hielo Harbin
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Festival de hielo Harbin

ePHocus update Rebecca Hills
26. 08. 2007
0 views

ePHocus update Rebecca Hills

Gerenciamiento 2132
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Gerenciamiento 2132

30 mw a si machine
26. 08. 2007
0 views

30 mw a si machine

excursions
19. 06. 2007
0 views

excursions

tl outcomes
12. 10. 2007
0 views

tl outcomes

MIC 03 Dodge WebQuest
27. 06. 2007
0 views

MIC 03 Dodge WebQuest

mms 04 16 dim
27. 06. 2007
0 views

mms 04 16 dim

PRESENTACION PROGRESO
22. 10. 2007
0 views

PRESENTACION PROGRESO

Errores irreparables 1988
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Errores irreparables 1988

EDLafcoPresent092805 chew
26. 08. 2007
0 views

EDLafcoPresent092805 chew

AH summer 07
26. 08. 2007
0 views

AH summer 07

1 Intro class1
26. 08. 2007
0 views

1 Intro class1

Murrieta PKS
08. 08. 2007
0 views

Murrieta PKS