Doha Cotton feb05

Information about Doha Cotton feb05

Published on January 25, 2008

Author: Penelope

Source: authorstream.com

Content

WTO ISSUES:  WTO ISSUES Doha Round Negotiations and the Cotton Case DTB Associates, LLP Doha Round: The Framework Agreement of August 1, 2004:  Doha Round: The Framework Agreement of August 1, 2004 A significant step forward: Consolidates progress made thus far and points the negotiations in the direction of a substantial outcome in all areas; Puts within reach one of the most important U.S. trade policy objectives of the past 30 years – the elimination of export subsidies; Mandates substantial improvements in market access; Sets up negotiation on domestic support that should lead to a significant leveling of the international playing field and a reduction in trade distortions; Allowed negotiators to avoid a breakdown that could have been fatal to the Doha Round and extremely damaging to the world trading system. BUT – just a step along the way Framework Agreement:  Framework Agreement Market access “Substantial improvements” for all products Banded approach to tariff reductions (harmonizing) Sensitive products “appropriate number, to be negotiated” TRQ expansion Special and differential treatment Framework Agreement (cont):  Framework Agreement (cont) Export subsidies Elimination of direct export subsidies Current EU limits: 13.4 m MT of wheat, 10mMT of coarse grains, etc. Other issues: Export credits Food aid State trading Framework Agreement (cont):  Framework Agreement (cont) Domestic support Calls for “substantial and effective” reductions in trade-distorting support “Strong element” of harmonization New blue box criteria (CCP) No reductions in “green box”; review of criteria Political reality: no Doha Round agreement without cuts in domestic subsidies Timeline:  Timeline 10/04 – 6/05: monthly meetings, focusing on “technical” issues, modalities 7/05: “First approximation” of modalities text 9/05 – 11/05: preparations for Hong Kong Ministerial 12/12/05 – 12/18/05: Hong Kong Ministerial; agreement on modalities? 12/06: Conclusion of negotiation? WTO Brazil – U.S. Cotton Case:  WTO Brazil – U.S. Cotton Case DTB Associates, LLP Status of the WTO Panel :  Status of the WTO Panel Brazil requested the panel in 2003. Panel report circulated in September. U.S. appealed findings. Report by Appellate Body due March 3. “Serious Prejudice” :  “Serious Prejudice” serious prejudice “may arise” if the effect of a subsidy is: To displace or impede imports by the subsidizing country; or To displace or impede the exports of another country to a third country market; or Price undercutting, price depression, price suppression or lost sales; or An increase in the world market share of the subsidizing country. (Subsidies Agreement, Articles 5&6) Article 3 – Prohibited Subsidies:  Article 3 – Prohibited Subsidies Subsidies contingent on export performance Subsidies contingent on use of domestic goods Panel Findings:  Panel Findings 1)The following programs for cotton cause significant price suppression and therefore serious prejudice to the interests of Brazil: a) marketing loan program payments, b) market loss assistance program payments, c) user marketing (Step 2) payments, d) counter-cyclical payments. Panel Findings:  Panel Findings 2)Brazil FAILED to establish that following programs caused serious prejudice: a) Production flexibility contract payments (1996 Bill) b) Direct payments (2002 Bill) c) Crop insurance payments HOWEVER, Panel also found that PFC payments and direct payments were not green box programs. Panel Findings:  Panel Findings 3)Export credit guarantee (GSM) programs are export subsidies. The U.S. is therefore in violation of its export subsidy commitments with respect to cotton and certain other commodities. 4)Step 2 payments are export subsidies and import substitution subsidies. What Does the Panel Ruling Mean for U.S. Cotton? :  What Does the Panel Ruling Mean for U.S. Cotton? Panel recommendation: U.S. remove serious prejudice – e.g., by reducing payments cotton producers or by modifying or eliminating cotton programs. Panel recommendation: U.S. eliminate illegal export subsidies – i.e., Step 2 program and export subsidy element of GSM programs – by July 1, 2005. What Does The Panel Ruling Mean for other U.S. Programs?:  What Does The Panel Ruling Mean for other U.S. Programs? 1) Domestic Subsidies and Serious Prejudice: Most other U.S. programs probably less vulnerable than cotton to serious prejudice complaint Cotton-Corn Comparison:  Cotton-Corn Comparison Subsidies as percent of value of production Cotton: 80% in 2000/01; 30% in 2002/03 Corn: 27% in 2000/01; 4% in 2002/03 Trends in production, price, exports and planted acreage also problematic for corn U.S. Cotton Production and Exports:  U.S. Cotton Production and Exports U.S. Corn Production and Exports:  U.S. Corn Production and Exports Source: USDA/FAS What Does The Panel Ruling Mean for other U.S. Programs?:  What Does The Panel Ruling Mean for other U.S. Programs? 1) Domestic Subsidies and Serious Prejudice (cont.) Certain other programs could be more vulnerable What Does The Panel Ruling Mean for other U.S. Programs?:  What Does The Panel Ruling Mean for other U.S. Programs? 2) Finding on export credits: implications for GSM program for corn, soybeans and rice. 3) Finding on production flexibility payments/direct payments: implications for future operation of program (U.S. would have exceeded its domestic subsidy limit by $8 billion in 1999.) Factors affecting U.S. farm policy decisions:  Factors affecting U.S. farm policy decisions Budget/fiscal deficit Doha Round negotiations Implementation of cotton case Policy reforms in other countries (e.g., EU, Canada, Japan) Results – U.S. may be forced to pay greater attention to international obligations when developing future farm policy

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Penelope

7E Acids and Alkalis
22. 01. 2008
0 views

7E Acids and Alkalis

India and Power
21. 01. 2008
0 views

India and Power

522 bioremediation
19. 01. 2008
0 views

522 bioremediation

MOLLUSKS 4 13 07
08. 01. 2008
0 views

MOLLUSKS 4 13 07

paper liners that work
10. 01. 2008
0 views

paper liners that work

Nazroo
11. 01. 2008
0 views

Nazroo

partnership
12. 01. 2008
0 views

partnership

N95 Respirator Training
13. 01. 2008
0 views

N95 Respirator Training

CISSIP Bahamas
15. 01. 2008
0 views

CISSIP Bahamas

schiffman08
17. 01. 2008
0 views

schiffman08

4 Unit 11
17. 01. 2008
0 views

4 Unit 11

06sw2aslides
18. 01. 2008
0 views

06sw2aslides

rastogi slides
23. 01. 2008
0 views

rastogi slides

HND203 Mail Routing Mastery
04. 02. 2008
0 views

HND203 Mail Routing Mastery

futureofgadgets2006
04. 02. 2008
0 views

futureofgadgets2006

TheCeramicsIndustry
11. 02. 2008
0 views

TheCeramicsIndustry

ifpte2002plenary
09. 01. 2008
0 views

ifpte2002plenary

ChesapeakeBayProject Web
15. 01. 2008
0 views

ChesapeakeBayProject Web

turningtorso
25. 01. 2008
0 views

turningtorso

federal estate gift tax
28. 01. 2008
0 views

federal estate gift tax

outline5
14. 02. 2008
0 views

outline5

beowulf
18. 02. 2008
0 views

beowulf

consumerbehavior
28. 01. 2008
0 views

consumerbehavior

Compton
29. 02. 2008
0 views

Compton

notes week12 priv tech
31. 01. 2008
0 views

notes week12 priv tech

Surrealist ethnography
03. 03. 2008
0 views

Surrealist ethnography

gapped summary 2005
08. 03. 2008
0 views

gapped summary 2005

WEDDING
05. 02. 2008
0 views

WEDDING

fy2006 04 tourism ecom impact
14. 03. 2008
0 views

fy2006 04 tourism ecom impact

Hazan Netart Seoul 2004
19. 03. 2008
0 views

Hazan Netart Seoul 2004

Benchmarking for ITE 06
21. 03. 2008
0 views

Benchmarking for ITE 06

week 8 logistics processes 2006
24. 03. 2008
0 views

week 8 logistics processes 2006

TBC Overview
07. 02. 2008
0 views

TBC Overview

Travel Seminar 02072008
07. 04. 2008
0 views

Travel Seminar 02072008

Business An$wers Only
08. 04. 2008
0 views

Business An$wers Only

ziegler
24. 01. 2008
0 views

ziegler

gc06 7
15. 04. 2008
0 views

gc06 7

pptgame
12. 02. 2008
0 views

pptgame

Passage b
17. 04. 2008
0 views

Passage b

Terry Young FEI OC China 5 9 07
22. 04. 2008
0 views

Terry Young FEI OC China 5 9 07

Altec Group Internet
24. 04. 2008
0 views

Altec Group Internet

Dr Sachin Chaturvedi
07. 05. 2008
0 views

Dr Sachin Chaturvedi

PD2
07. 02. 2008
0 views

PD2

temporal reasoning CAA 04 12
02. 05. 2008
0 views

temporal reasoning CAA 04 12

SECCHI STEREOswg04v6
22. 01. 2008
0 views

SECCHI STEREOswg04v6

TheCaseforPro LifeDems
10. 01. 2008
0 views

TheCaseforPro LifeDems

UTIL WaterConservationTips 03 06
03. 03. 2008
0 views

UTIL WaterConservationTips 03 06

ch10 1
13. 01. 2008
0 views

ch10 1

GetCleanPresentation
22. 01. 2008
0 views

GetCleanPresentation

COTAR Nov02 ReportAPSEPG2002
23. 01. 2008
0 views

COTAR Nov02 ReportAPSEPG2002

CurrentTrendsGlassRe cycling
09. 01. 2008
0 views

CurrentTrendsGlassRe cycling

BIC
17. 01. 2008
0 views

BIC

celle
07. 03. 2008
0 views

celle

bodewits
16. 01. 2008
0 views

bodewits