ELearning Conf collins

Information about ELearning Conf collins

Published on December 12, 2007

Author: Esteban

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Slide1:  Hybrid Courses: The Pros & Cons of Online Learning Kennesaw State University, Department of Visual Arts: Charlotte Collins, Asst. Prof. of Art, College Of The Arts Core Coordinator Dr. Linda Hightower, Professor of Art, Department Chair Natasha Lovelace, Asst. Professor of Art, Department of University Studies Slide2:  Hybrid Courses: The Cons of Online Learning Some learning techniques require interactive activities: • lab activities (haptic learning styles) • demonstrations • group presentations • class critiques • spontaneous “teaching moments” Slide3:  Hybrid Courses: The Cons of Online Learning Some learning techniques require interactive activities: • instantaneous q & a, group discussions, feedback • personal insights during lectures • visual & auditory interplay with speaker and audience • live performances & guest lectures Slide4:  Further Cons of Online Learning: • Learning Style Limitations • Class Size Limitations • Managerial Time Increased (email, discussions, updates, content management, technology problems, learning curve for faculty and students) • Papers, quizzes & tests require more faculty time Essential: • Administrative Support • Technology Support Slide5:  Pros of Online Learning: that can & can not be met in Hybrid Courses Online Courses: • Students can often work at their own pace • Work and personal schedules can be prioritized • Class space is relieved Student Responder Pads: • Saves money for xerox copies • Tests and quizzes are graded electronically Online Website: • Information is stored & available 24 hours a day (saves money for text &/or xerox copies) • Students can monitor their own progress • Email, announcements, & discussions facilitated Slide6:  Help for Hybrid Courses: Responder Pads in the Classroom: Pros & Cons Is there a remote control that can: • save money for text and xerox copies • grade tests & quizzes electronically, • take attendance, • tally surveys, • provide instant feedback & study guides, and • encourage group discussions (even in large classes)? Slide7:  What are the PROS that we have experienced in classes of 20 &100 students? • Saves instructor grading time & class time • Saves department money: Paperless option • Ability to generate individualized study guides • Receive feedback from quiet students • Ability to call on random students by name • Ability to manipulate assessment methods for each question • Ability to assess reading comprehension & attendance instantaneously • Fosters brainstorming, discussions, critical thinking, & critiques • Ability to quiz during PowerPoint lectures • Students love it Slide8:  How does it work? 1. Instructor writes questions & answers in multiple choice, true/false, yes/no, or subjective question (not for credit) format. Images can be included in questions, answers, or both. Questions can also be given orally in a spontaneous method during a PowerPoint presentation. 2. Each student in the classroom sends their response to a receiver through their remote pad. Assessments can be teacher managed, which allows time for discussion & questions. They can also be student managed, allowing students to move at their own pace. 3. Answers are scored electronically. Faculty can download results in Excel spreadsheets, or print & enter into their regular grade book or website gradebook manually. Slide9:  CPS Main Page: Classes Folder (students register themselves) Slide10:  CPS Main Page: Lessons Folder Slide11:  PROS: Variety of Individual Question Format Options Slide12:  Teacher Managed(or paced) questions allow discussion time. Student Managed questions allow them to move at their own pace. Slide13:  Sample Question with Visual (responder pad identification number appear at the bottom {before students respond}) Slide14:  Sample Question w/ Visual (pad id number as students respond) Blue= response recorded; Green= already recorded; Yellow= answer changed; Red= letter chosen is not an option (D) Slide15:  PROS: Saves Grading Time Sample of Instructor Summary Report Slide16:  PROS: Variety of Report Options Slide17:  PROS: Ability to call on Random Students for questioning during PowerPoint Lectures (great for large classes) Slide18:  PROS: Ability to Quickly Assess Reading Comprehension On a Daily Basis, it also Serves as Attendance Slide19:  PROS: Attendance Assessment without Questions Slide20:  PROS: Example of a Subjective Question (no credit) Fosters Critical Thinking Skills and Class Discussion Slide21:  PROS: Ability to Survey Opinions During Class Can be anonymous Slide22:  PROS: Ability to Deliver Quizzes during PowerPoint Lectures Slide23:  What are the CONS that we have experienced in classes of 20 &100 students? • Initial learning curve (our company offered excellent technical support service, on-line training & manuals) • Student expense: purchase & registration fee (both of these vary with the company) • Difficulty with receivers, software, and response pads (again, our company offered excellent support service) • Cheating possibilities (radio frequency pads eliminate this, as do Student Managed questions with multiple tests) • Faculty are resistant to technology * Please give any suggestions you may have to resolve these issues in the questionnaire on the table. Slide24:  Help for Hybrid Courses: Online Website: Pros Online Website software can: • save money for text and xerox copies • grade tests & quizzes electronically (textbook support software) • allows students to take tests & quizzes at own pace (within instructor deadlines) • store information that is available 24 hours a day • allow students to monitor their progress (gradebook) • allow students to move ahead (optional) • facilitate email, announcements, and discussions • save class time Is it for you? Go to charcollins.pageout.net Slide25:  What are the CONS that we have experienced in classes of 20 &100 students? • Initial learning curve (our company offered excellent technical support service, on-line training & manuals) • Possible technology problems for students with older computers • Faculty are resistant to technology Again, please give any comments or suggestions you may have in the questionnaire on the table. Slide26:  Any Questions, Comments or Suggestions? • Please jot them down in the questionnaire on the table. We would appreciate your input! Contacts: Charlotte Collins, Asst. Professor of Art, College of the Arts Core Coordinator, Dept. of Visual Arts, Kennesaw State University, 770-423-6138, [email protected] Dr. Linda Hightower, Professor of Art, Department Chair, Dept. of Visual Arts, Kennesaw State University, 770-423-6139, lhight[email protected] Natasha Lovelace, Asst. Professor of Art, Dept. of University Studies, Kennesaw State University, 770-423-6138, [email protected]

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Esteban

Chapter 15 Knee Conditions
28. 11. 2007
0 views

Chapter 15 Knee Conditions

S WATER
09. 10. 2007
0 views

S WATER

Istvan Bilik
29. 10. 2007
0 views

Istvan Bilik

The Rise of Mussolini in Italy
01. 11. 2007
0 views

The Rise of Mussolini in Italy

intro cicero
01. 11. 2007
0 views

intro cicero

titanic
05. 11. 2007
0 views

titanic

00 18 pp7
05. 11. 2007
0 views

00 18 pp7

defence ficci
05. 11. 2007
0 views

defence ficci

bisnovatiykogan
13. 11. 2007
0 views

bisnovatiykogan

firm
22. 11. 2007
0 views

firm

UDSL Pres 4
26. 11. 2007
0 views

UDSL Pres 4

Insomnia
29. 11. 2007
0 views

Insomnia

ag environment
28. 12. 2007
0 views

ag environment

SAS781 016ArticleSlideShow
01. 01. 2008
0 views

SAS781 016ArticleSlideShow

Friendship Quotes
02. 01. 2008
0 views

Friendship Quotes

Lesson 16 Leader of Russia
26. 10. 2007
0 views

Lesson 16 Leader of Russia

Electronics 1 20 06
07. 11. 2007
0 views

Electronics 1 20 06

BATALIN FEB 13 04
07. 01. 2008
0 views

BATALIN FEB 13 04

Slides4c
07. 01. 2008
0 views

Slides4c

NRES322 14
08. 01. 2008
0 views

NRES322 14

Weese MRSA
19. 11. 2007
0 views

Weese MRSA

Shore Stephen
13. 12. 2007
0 views

Shore Stephen

Gerberding 07 AAIDD
24. 10. 2007
0 views

Gerberding 07 AAIDD

halloween history
05. 11. 2007
0 views

halloween history

june25 natural dhananjay
20. 02. 2008
0 views

june25 natural dhananjay

BEST03
24. 02. 2008
0 views

BEST03

ch9
27. 02. 2008
0 views

ch9

TrainingPanel
29. 02. 2008
0 views

TrainingPanel

080407
14. 03. 2008
0 views

080407

cares
27. 03. 2008
0 views

cares

UNIDO1
30. 03. 2008
0 views

UNIDO1

Praes WR Glaser DGfPs
16. 11. 2007
0 views

Praes WR Glaser DGfPs

Tireoidites CM 2006
28. 12. 2007
0 views

Tireoidites CM 2006

sommaruga
25. 10. 2007
0 views

sommaruga

Card Sort Indian Artifacts
19. 11. 2007
0 views

Card Sort Indian Artifacts

Exodus08
24. 10. 2007
0 views

Exodus08

Arthur Sadoff
28. 09. 2007
0 views

Arthur Sadoff

research industry partnerships
16. 11. 2007
0 views

research industry partnerships

Molvir Flavi Toga 01 19 06
24. 10. 2007
0 views

Molvir Flavi Toga 01 19 06

Chris Aalberts
25. 12. 2007
0 views

Chris Aalberts

mission mech garden intro
11. 12. 2007
0 views

mission mech garden intro

library agent
30. 10. 2007
0 views

library agent

FallOffDutySafety
06. 11. 2007
0 views

FallOffDutySafety

cours sts intro gen 2005
12. 11. 2007
0 views

cours sts intro gen 2005

JanConrad mar10 06
14. 11. 2007
0 views

JanConrad mar10 06

re nsdi06 slides
18. 12. 2007
0 views

re nsdi06 slides

AMC Italy Intro CMonticelli
31. 10. 2007
0 views

AMC Italy Intro CMonticelli

CROSSMARC Rome Intro
31. 10. 2007
0 views

CROSSMARC Rome Intro

Liz presentation
28. 12. 2007
0 views

Liz presentation

anheuser1
05. 11. 2007
0 views

anheuser1

AUST Overview for Website
06. 11. 2007
0 views

AUST Overview for Website

2b lanciotti
24. 10. 2007
0 views

2b lanciotti

OWK2006 Dixon SBDC
29. 10. 2007
0 views

OWK2006 Dixon SBDC

L23 ch14
03. 10. 2007
0 views

L23 ch14

JAA etno maj 2005
01. 12. 2007
0 views

JAA etno maj 2005

Japansk encefalitt
24. 10. 2007
0 views

Japansk encefalitt

MM5 yhe
04. 01. 2008
0 views

MM5 yhe