Giving Bad News

Information about Giving Bad News

Published on September 28, 2007

Author: Irvette

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Slide1:  Giving Bad News Learning objectives:  Learning objectives List the 6 steps in giving bad news Adapt the bad news protocol to your work setting Explain how the manner in which bad news is given can impact patient outcome and patient care Explain how culture impacts patient information needs and decision-making Consider a case:  Consider a case 24-year-old F; HIV+ for 3 years; current IVDU Unstable living situation Estranged from family On HAART, but questionable adherence Recent abnormal LFTs You are meeting with her to give her a Hep C diagnosis Do physicians give bad news?:  Do physicians give bad news? 1961 Oken in JAMA Survey of 219 physicians 88% generally DID NOT inform patients of a cancer diagnosis 1979 Novak in JAMA Survey of 264 physicians 98% generally DID inform patients of a cancer diagnosis Giving bad news:  Giving bad news Reviewing the evidence Recommendations for clinicians Cultural considerations Reviewing the evidence :  Reviewing the evidence What do patients want to know? How do patients experience bad news? How competent are physicians in giving bad news? How should physicians give bad news? Does how bad news is given make a difference? Do cultural differences matter? What do patients want to know?:  What do patients want to know? 2,331 patients at UK cancer centers: –98% wanted to know if the illness was cancer –87% patients preferred “as much information as possible” Need to individualize delivery to patient needs Jenkins, Br J Cancer 2001;84:48-51 How do patients experience bad news?:  How do patients experience bad news? Bad news results in a cognitive, behavioral, or emotional deficit in the person receiving the news that persists Clinicians can’t change the news Clinicians can make the news worse, or they can help give realistic hopes A variety of responses to bad news:  A variety of responses to bad news 100 patients diagnosed with cancer: Shock 54% Fright 46% Accept 40% Sadness 24% Not worried 15% Lobb, Med J Aust 1999: 290-4 Responses to bad news:  Responses to bad news 4,527 patients tested for Huntington disease <1% experienced “catastrophic event” Including suicide, attempted suicide, psychiatric hospitalization Increased risk associated with those with manifestations of Huntington’s those with previous psychiatric illness those who were unemployed Almqvist, Am J Hum Genet 1999: 1293-1304 People receiving bad news may not remember much:  People receiving bad news may not remember much Three months after parents received bad news 12 of 23 sets took in “little or none of the information given” 4 of 23 sets denied that a separate information session had occurred 10 of 19 sets remembered the information session, but didn’t understand the content Eden, Pall Med 1994: 105-114 Medical jargon can make bad news worse:  Medical jargon can make bad news worse Technical language frequently unclear 100 women with breast cancer: 73% misunderstood “median survival” No agreement on what a “good” chance of survival meant numerically Ford, Soc Sci Med 1996: 1511-9 Physicians are inaccurate in detecting distress :  Physicians are inaccurate in detecting distress 5 oncologists studied intensively None predicted patient distress better than chance One had negative predictive behavior All very satisfied with their performance Little probing about patient emotional state Ford, Br J Cancer 1994: 767-70 Patient and clinician stress related to bad news:  Patient and clinician stress related to bad news Ptacek, JAMA 1996: 496-502 Stress Time Encounter Patient Clinician Gaps in what patients want and what they receive:  Gaps in what patients want and what they receive Most patients are highly ‘satisfied’ yet: 57% wanted to discuss life expectancy, but only 27% actually did 63% wanted to discuss the effects of cancer on other aspects of life, but only 35% actually did Lobb, Med J Aust 1999: 290-4 Pitfalls in giving bad news:  Pitfalls in giving bad news 79 patients, 68 family said bad news encounter was suboptimal because: Physician was too blunt Place or time was inappropriate Patient got the sense that there was no hope, they wanted physicians to balance sensitivity and honesty Curtis, J Gen Intern Med 2001: 41-9 How bad news is given makes a difference:  How bad news is given makes a difference 100 patients with breast cancer, adjustment to illness correlated with: Physician behavior during cancer diagnostic interview History of psychiatric issues Premorbid life stressors Patients dissatisfied with how physicians provided information were 2x more likely to be depressed or anxious Roberts, Cancer 1994, 74 (1 supp): 336-41 A recommended protocol for giving bad news:  A recommended protocol for giving bad news 1. Prepare info, location, setting 2. Find out what they already know 3. Ask how much they want to know 4. Share the information 5. Respond to the patient’s emotion 6. Negotiate a concrete follow-up step Buckman, How to Break Bad News, 1992 Bad news protocol:  Bad news protocol 1. Prepare Know the facts Find time A quiet space The right people Nonverbal cues: distance, posture, eye level Bad news protocol:  Bad news protocol 2. Find out what the patient already knows: “I want to make sure we’re on the same page; what have other doctors told you?” “When you first had (symptom), what did you think it might be?” Bad news protocol:  Bad news protocol 3. Ask how much the patient wants to know: “Would you like me to tell you the full details of your condition or is there someone else you would like me to talk to?” Bad news protocol:  Bad news protocol 4. Share the information: Warning shot “I have some bad news about the results of your blood test.” Bad news protocol:  Bad news protocol 4. Share the information: Use language at the same level as the patient’s: “Did you get that? Did that make sense to you?” Bad news protocol: Final steps:  Bad news protocol: Final steps 5. Respond to the patient’s emotions: –Acknowledge, name, empathize “I can see that this wasn’t something you expected to hear.” –You don’t have to agree with the emotion or share it. Bad news protocol: Final steps:  Bad news protocol: Final steps 6. Negotiate a concrete follow-up step: “Let’s talk next week after you see the GI specialist.” Dealing with the fallout:  Dealing with the fallout Walk through the bad news encounter Use case-specific knowledge Know usual clinician pitfalls: Failure to assess understanding Failure to acknowledge emotion Survey of 800 patients in LA: Assessing cultural differences:  Survey of 800 patients in LA: Assessing cultural differences Should a patient: Be told of a Decide diagnosis about of cancer life-support African-American 88% 60% European-American 87% 65% Mexican-American 43% 41% Korean-American 35% 28% Blackhall, JAMA, 1995; 274:820 Can discussing death cause harm?:  Can discussing death cause harm? Studies have shown that people from many different cultures are more likely to believe discussing death can bring death closer: African-Americans Some Native-Americans Immigrants from China, Korea, Mexico Curtis, Arch Intern Med, 2000; 60:1690 Caralis, J Clin Ethics, 1992; 4:155 Caresse, JAMA, 1995; 274:86 Exploring cultural beliefs:  Exploring cultural beliefs What do you think might be going on? If we needed to discuss a serious medical issue, how would you and your family want to handle it? Would you want to handle the information and decision-making, or should that be done by someone else in the family? Kagawa-Singer, JAMA 2001; 286:2993 Summary:  Summary Giving bad news is a fundamental communication skill How bad news is delivered can affect how patients adjust to the illness Exploring cultural beliefs is important in adapting the bad news communication to each patient Contributors:  Contributors Anthony Back, MD Director J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH Co-Director Frances Petracca, PhD Evaluator Liz Stevens, MSW Project Manager Thanks to Elizabeth Vig, MD, MPH, for her contributions to this module. Visit our Website at uwpallcare.org Copyright 2003, Center for Palliative Care Education, University of Washington This project is funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF).

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Irvette

Propaganda
29. 12. 2007
0 views

Propaganda

lecture3 yeast
16. 10. 2007
0 views

lecture3 yeast

Nutrient Mobility 26
04. 10. 2007
0 views

Nutrient Mobility 26

bad honnef
05. 10. 2007
0 views

bad honnef

olsug 0402 10Hannay Nature
08. 10. 2007
0 views

olsug 0402 10Hannay Nature

Presentation Japan
09. 10. 2007
0 views

Presentation Japan

IRAN and RUSSIA Oil Gas Policies
11. 10. 2007
0 views

IRAN and RUSSIA Oil Gas Policies

present
12. 10. 2007
0 views

present

Presentation Russia
12. 10. 2007
0 views

Presentation Russia

Aula 6
15. 10. 2007
0 views

Aula 6

13 Equine Sciences
19. 10. 2007
0 views

13 Equine Sciences

Panama Canal powerpoint
22. 10. 2007
0 views

Panama Canal powerpoint

Cathia Palmer MI BANCO
22. 10. 2007
0 views

Cathia Palmer MI BANCO

MOROCCO Time Line Power Point
23. 10. 2007
0 views

MOROCCO Time Line Power Point

clim forecast
02. 10. 2007
0 views

clim forecast

5004
10. 12. 2007
0 views

5004

Quake06 template v3
29. 10. 2007
0 views

Quake06 template v3

Hendra
31. 10. 2007
0 views

Hendra

Veschetti PL
01. 11. 2007
0 views

Veschetti PL

imo bw dip con highlights
06. 11. 2007
0 views

imo bw dip con highlights

itt recruitment challenges wales
06. 11. 2007
0 views

itt recruitment challenges wales

showcase
17. 10. 2007
0 views

showcase

fuel tank safety
07. 11. 2007
0 views

fuel tank safety

CClub2 11 08 05 Part 2
19. 11. 2007
0 views

CClub2 11 08 05 Part 2

2006StatsRRTC 3 4
29. 11. 2007
0 views

2006StatsRRTC 3 4

Hospitality Industry Workforce
14. 12. 2007
0 views

Hospitality Industry Workforce

Goff
06. 12. 2007
0 views

Goff

florence1
31. 10. 2007
0 views

florence1

cindy zheng update
17. 10. 2007
0 views

cindy zheng update

Town Hall PowerPoint 6 14 04
18. 10. 2007
0 views

Town Hall PowerPoint 6 14 04

abc5fm
09. 10. 2007
0 views

abc5fm

D Baker RadBelt
30. 10. 2007
0 views

D Baker RadBelt

Thursday
19. 10. 2007
0 views

Thursday

humn presentation
17. 10. 2007
0 views

humn presentation

berkeley04r
28. 11. 2007
0 views

berkeley04r

Hybridmedia in Japan 2005 small
09. 10. 2007
0 views

Hybridmedia in Japan 2005 small

osipenko
15. 10. 2007
0 views

osipenko

Henry VIIIs Problems
05. 10. 2007
0 views

Henry VIIIs Problems

NWAV 2007
31. 10. 2007
0 views

NWAV 2007

Rhetoric AmerDream ppt
19. 02. 2008
0 views

Rhetoric AmerDream ppt

AW12
29. 10. 2007
0 views

AW12

Small Arms Marking Overview
26. 02. 2008
0 views

Small Arms Marking Overview

HazeConsult 032207
05. 10. 2007
0 views

HazeConsult 032207

09 EMI
05. 11. 2007
0 views

09 EMI

class10 22
28. 02. 2008
0 views

class10 22

L17 PT2 Splicing1
15. 10. 2007
0 views

L17 PT2 Splicing1

ES110 Hazardous Waste
10. 03. 2008
0 views

ES110 Hazardous Waste

003 Glenn Jerome
16. 03. 2008
0 views

003 Glenn Jerome

explorer
25. 03. 2008
0 views

explorer

Lect 10A Tides
03. 04. 2008
0 views

Lect 10A Tides

chap19
08. 04. 2008
0 views

chap19

leb shaw
13. 04. 2008
0 views

leb shaw

gelisim 1
16. 10. 2007
0 views

gelisim 1

rm2 lautanala
19. 10. 2007
0 views

rm2 lautanala

Kickoff Poster Italy 1
31. 10. 2007
0 views

Kickoff Poster Italy 1

Collateral Damage 9 27 06
22. 04. 2008
0 views

Collateral Damage 9 27 06

Food show Big
05. 01. 2008
0 views

Food show Big

B1 U10 A
06. 05. 2008
0 views

B1 U10 A

EC2004 ch10
07. 05. 2008
0 views

EC2004 ch10

Home Hemo dialysis Presentation
07. 05. 2008
0 views

Home Hemo dialysis Presentation

CBMB discrimination
08. 05. 2008
0 views

CBMB discrimination

Youth Program Presentation
08. 05. 2008
0 views

Youth Program Presentation

5 Hall evidence based medicine
08. 05. 2008
0 views

5 Hall evidence based medicine

Remote Learning VATAT
02. 05. 2008
0 views

Remote Learning VATAT

Heart Reports
02. 05. 2008
0 views

Heart Reports

CDC033 Presentation
02. 05. 2008
0 views

CDC033 Presentation

ProviderFraudTrainin gPartII
02. 05. 2008
0 views

ProviderFraudTrainin gPartII

TEXPEC ACP program
02. 05. 2008
0 views

TEXPEC ACP program

Presentation30
11. 10. 2007
0 views

Presentation30

raceway Jarnigan
12. 10. 2007
0 views

raceway Jarnigan

Presentation MAROC 10 2006
24. 10. 2007
0 views

Presentation MAROC 10 2006

MoscowPres2fin GK 220207
26. 10. 2007
0 views

MoscowPres2fin GK 220207

131
18. 04. 2008
0 views

131

Boeing2003
24. 10. 2007
0 views

Boeing2003

morocco1105
24. 10. 2007
0 views

morocco1105

Linux101
02. 11. 2007
0 views

Linux101

Airspace needs
09. 10. 2007
0 views

Airspace needs

JackieWilliamson Sabah
13. 03. 2008
0 views

JackieWilliamson Sabah

WVEB NCSM
08. 10. 2008
0 views

WVEB NCSM

Presentacion AIDS Helder Mario
28. 12. 2007
0 views

Presentacion AIDS Helder Mario

PURI SCAG Presentation 111601 1
10. 04. 2008
0 views

PURI SCAG Presentation 111601 1

EQ OEM Presentation Nov04
02. 05. 2008
0 views

EQ OEM Presentation Nov04

Mr Anup Banerji ppt to CII
11. 12. 2007
0 views

Mr Anup Banerji ppt to CII

AdrianaMaria2
24. 10. 2007
0 views

AdrianaMaria2

El mundo del espectaculo2
02. 11. 2007
0 views

El mundo del espectaculo2

ECS2006PresentationGB
15. 10. 2007
0 views

ECS2006PresentationGB

SURF X4L
12. 10. 2007
0 views

SURF X4L

Schulte
06. 03. 2008
0 views

Schulte

Valtio luennot
20. 11. 2007
0 views

Valtio luennot

trw vortrag 18 03 04
16. 11. 2007
0 views

trw vortrag 18 03 04

GA GTIPGTEJones2
03. 10. 2007
0 views

GA GTIPGTEJones2

interim03
10. 10. 2007
0 views

interim03

haulintr
27. 02. 2008
0 views

haulintr

pandrangi
29. 09. 2007
0 views

pandrangi

Disz
01. 05. 2008
0 views

Disz

ETW2005SeminarVIII
23. 10. 2007
0 views

ETW2005SeminarVIII

Galkin prospecting
30. 10. 2007
0 views

Galkin prospecting

edpre040505
07. 10. 2007
0 views

edpre040505

sensor mama
03. 10. 2007
0 views

sensor mama

2nd European GIC
07. 01. 2008
0 views

2nd European GIC