GMO EU Bans

Information about GMO EU Bans

Published on May 8, 2008

Author: Donato

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Slide1:  GMOs, Trade Policy, and Welfare in Rich and Poor Countries University of Copenhagen, and Danish Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Economics Chantal Nielsen Kym Anderson CEPR, and School of Economics, and Centre for International Economic Studies University of Adelaide Slide2:  Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture Proponents argue that GMOs can offer: Increased ag productivity & higher farm profits Less use of chemicals Better use of natural resources More nutritious foods Slide3:  Opponents are concerned about: The environment Food safety Market power Ethics Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture Slide4:  Rich countries can afford to be critical Developing countries face a different trade-off between potential risks and the need for productivity increases in food production and lower food prices Developing countries also need to consider how GMO policy actions may affect: - market access - world market prices - global food demand Slide5:  Three types of technical barrier to trade: Import bans Technical standards Information remedies Standards concerning GMOs have not yet been established … but there is a possibility of import bans and a demand for labels, which is leading to: National GMO regulations International trade agreements Slide6:  National GMO regulations: European Union: De facto moratorium since June 1999 Labelling required on all GMO-inclusive foods United States: Flexible permit procedure Labelling of GMOs is generally not required Others are also beginning to regulate GMOs, with some (e.g. Sri Lanka) already banning their importation Slide7:  International trade agreements: (i) The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Objective: Ensure safe transboundary movement of GMOs Allows govt’s to decide whether or not to accept GMO imports and under what conditions Lack of scientific evidence shall not prevent a country in taking action “May contain GMOs” label on primary products Slide8:  International trade agreements: (ii) The WTO The WTO also acknowledges the rights of a country to protect its environment and to ensure food safety and information for consumers. But there are rules on how such trade-related measures may be used to achieve these goals. Slide9:  International trade agreements: Potential conflict between Protocol and WTO rules, particularly concerning: WTO’s SPS agreement requires scientific evidence The product/process distinction: ‘like products’ Slide10:  Empirical analysis Two regulatory response scenarios 1. Western Europe imposes a ban on GM imports as permitted in the Biosafety Protocol 2. The WTO rules against the import ban, but allows the labels as defined in the Protocol Quantify the effects of GMO adoption by some producers, and regulations on production, trade and welfare in other countries Slide11:  Modelling framework Standard global economy-wide CGE model Vertical and horizontal linkages, bilateral trade GTAP database: 17 sectors and 16 regions Representation of GMO technology: +5 % TFP shock for maize and soybean in North America, Mexico, Southern Cone of LA, India, China, Rest of East Asia and South Africa All other regions do not adopt GM crops Slide12:  1. WEU import ban scenario Imports of maize and soybeans banned from GM-regions Protocol label enables identification of GMOs Labelling costs are assumed to be negligible 2. Protocol label scenario “May contain GMOs” label is perceived as uninformative Partial shift in WEU preferences away from imports and in favour of domestic products WEU producers signal non-GMO status through “country of origin” labels Slide13:  Selected results of WEU ban and Protocol label scenarios Percentage change from base with no GMO regulations Slide14:  Selected results of WEU ban and Protocol label scenarios Percentage change from base with no GMO regulations Slide15:  Selected results of WEU ban and Protocol label scenarios Welfare changes and their decomposition (per year) Slide16:  Selected results of WEU ban and Protocol label scenarios Welfare changes and their decomposition (per year) Slide17:  Selected results of WEU ban and Protocol label scenarios Welfare changes and their decomposition (per year) Slide18:  Global welfare changes: Base with no GMO regulations: 9.9 billion USD WEU import ban scenario: 3.4 billion USD Protocol label scenario: 8.5 billion USD Selected results of WEU ban and Protocol label scenarios Welfare changes and their decomposition (per year) Slide19:  What do these results indicate about the effect of GMO regulations on production, trade & welfare Almost all countries gain from selected countries adopting GMO technology if there are no GMO trade regulations But this is so for different reasons, depending on - whether or not GMO crops are produced nationally - nation’s net-exporter status in the particular crop - initial price distortionary policies Slide20:  3. A market-based solution is far better for both adopters and WEU - but other non-adopting regions lose in terms of a relative productivity decline and increased competition on international markets 2. WEU import ban is very costly for WEU itself - and production in adopting countries might fall in spite of positive TFP shock, depending on importance to them of WEU and other export markets - non-adopters gain market shares in WEU Slide21:  Future analytical work on the economics of GMOs Need to fine-tune empirical evidence of productivity impact of GM technology 2. Consumer reactions to regulations, or lack thereof, depend on how well the regulations meet national policy objectives 3. Split the model’s national production and marketing systems into GMO and non-GMO products

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Donato

The Rise of Dictators
20. 04. 2008
0 views

The Rise of Dictators

csharp
21. 02. 2008
0 views

csharp

Conference Brochure web
10. 01. 2008
0 views

Conference Brochure web

P17 Biljakovic
11. 01. 2008
0 views

P17 Biljakovic

10 02 ed406a
12. 01. 2008
0 views

10 02 ed406a

Physical descriptions Bible
13. 01. 2008
0 views

Physical descriptions Bible

4 Mining
14. 01. 2008
0 views

4 Mining

Role of Race and Ethnicity
14. 01. 2008
0 views

Role of Race and Ethnicity

main stream school as a deaf
14. 01. 2008
0 views

main stream school as a deaf

InfantWellness
15. 01. 2008
0 views

InfantWellness

434 L18 Marine Pollution 07
15. 01. 2008
0 views

434 L18 Marine Pollution 07

WinRDBI
16. 01. 2008
0 views

WinRDBI

Alexander von Humboldt fertig
17. 01. 2008
0 views

Alexander von Humboldt fertig

Mesa Teen Dating Violence65466
17. 01. 2008
0 views

Mesa Teen Dating Violence65466

water LCHS
17. 01. 2008
0 views

water LCHS

galileo new
17. 01. 2008
0 views

galileo new

Colonies Powerpoint
19. 01. 2008
0 views

Colonies Powerpoint

OSTP Lewis
21. 01. 2008
0 views

OSTP Lewis

pptEarlyBCNewspapers
21. 01. 2008
0 views

pptEarlyBCNewspapers

SumerOL
22. 01. 2008
0 views

SumerOL

Whole Show Welch 2007
23. 01. 2008
0 views

Whole Show Welch 2007

JC NIH INRIA160407ppt
05. 02. 2008
0 views

JC NIH INRIA160407ppt

Wedding Presentation email
05. 02. 2008
0 views

Wedding Presentation email

InfoSec120804 web 2
04. 02. 2008
0 views

InfoSec120804 web 2

The Civil War Era
12. 02. 2008
0 views

The Civil War Era

Psychotherapy
28. 01. 2008
0 views

Psychotherapy

energysecurity
06. 02. 2008
0 views

energysecurity

david35
07. 02. 2008
0 views

david35

Fichner Rathus CH09
11. 02. 2008
0 views

Fichner Rathus CH09

wipo smes ge 07 www 81572
12. 02. 2008
0 views

wipo smes ge 07 www 81572

rpc dae
09. 01. 2008
0 views

rpc dae

Klein
09. 01. 2008
0 views

Klein

Android Idea
25. 02. 2008
0 views

Android Idea

Peds Asthma
28. 02. 2008
0 views

Peds Asthma

Cubism
03. 03. 2008
0 views

Cubism

ppt00022
04. 02. 2008
0 views

ppt00022

George Mucibabici Deloitte
07. 03. 2008
0 views

George Mucibabici Deloitte

African Culture
10. 01. 2008
0 views

African Culture

04 TransmissionMedia
24. 03. 2008
0 views

04 TransmissionMedia

Performance Driven Government
31. 03. 2008
0 views

Performance Driven Government

i20083241155
14. 04. 2008
0 views

i20083241155

Israel Paralympics
16. 04. 2008
0 views

Israel Paralympics

MDiazGELSS2003
17. 01. 2008
0 views

MDiazGELSS2003

Skarb sport reng
22. 04. 2008
0 views

Skarb sport reng

H105l
14. 01. 2008
0 views

H105l

f7
07. 02. 2008
0 views

f7

Hood Canal CD Final 25Jan08 1
24. 04. 2008
0 views

Hood Canal CD Final 25Jan08 1

US Fed Indian Policy
11. 03. 2008
0 views

US Fed Indian Policy

Introduccion al Fast Track
06. 05. 2008
0 views

Introduccion al Fast Track

CHINA ROHS SEMI CONWEST redick
07. 05. 2008
0 views

CHINA ROHS SEMI CONWEST redick

obrien
08. 05. 2008
0 views

obrien

audvotpowpoint
30. 04. 2008
0 views

audvotpowpoint

Abo dar3 hav mots
07. 02. 2008
0 views

Abo dar3 hav mots

vpbusiness 2004
11. 02. 2008
0 views

vpbusiness 2004

Beauty
08. 03. 2008
0 views

Beauty

LA STEM pres5
16. 01. 2008
0 views

LA STEM pres5

Polarhide And Roof Heat Edited
25. 01. 2008
0 views

Polarhide And Roof Heat Edited

Games2
22. 01. 2008
0 views

Games2

tvp urg
17. 01. 2008
0 views

tvp urg

wombwithaview
08. 01. 2008
0 views

wombwithaview

Proposal slides
08. 04. 2008
0 views

Proposal slides

corporate partnership
22. 01. 2008
0 views

corporate partnership

POA June 2006
10. 01. 2008
0 views

POA June 2006

LifeShapes 1
29. 01. 2008
0 views

LifeShapes 1

Clavel
22. 01. 2008
0 views

Clavel