Grammar Evolution2

Information about Grammar Evolution2

Published on November 5, 2007

Author: Crystal

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Traces of Grammar Evolution:  Traces of Grammar Evolution Protoconstructions, Patches and Mismatch Effects Laura A. Michaelis Department of Linguistics & Institute of Cognitive Science University of Colorado at Boulder July 17, 2007 STATPHYS 2007 Erice Overview: Grammar Dilemmas:  Overview: Grammar Dilemmas Within any given speech community, some people have different linguistic generalizations from others. For example, some people would say (a), others (b): (a) It is you who are confused. (b) It is you who is confused. A language critic could say that (b) is the wrong generalization: it fails to take into account that you is a second-person pronoun, and therefore selects are. Another could say that (a) is the wrong generalization: the subject of the second verb is not you but who, a third-person singular. Overview: Grammar Dilemmas:  Overview: Grammar Dilemmas In fact, it is the cleft construction that is at fault: is and are are equally valid solutions. This is why both solutions are attested: It is you who are displaying distinct Talibanistic characteristics. (tenets.zoroastrianism.com) You are wrong, Mr. Blair: It is you who is prejudiced about science. (newstatesman.com) When one solution gets adopted, we could say that grammar has changed, but it’s more accurate to say that a construction has changed. Grammar change occurs on a construction-by-construction basis. Grammar by Increments:  Grammar by Increments The view that grammatical generalizations are construction-bound accords with Jackendoff’s claim that grammar is not a single unified system, but a collection of simpler systems. […] Hence the evolution of the language capacity can be seen as deeply incremental. (2002: 264) Incremental development results in layers, which contain patterns I will call protoconstructions. Protoconstructions resemble early strategies in language development: they lack inflection and hierarchical structure and have context-dependent meanings (Bickerton 1990, Jackendoff 1999). Protoconstructions:  Protoconstructions Protoconstructions can combine with sentence-building constructions, but when they do, the components that they add are (1) on the margins of the clause, (2) dispensable and (3) intonationally separate: Vocatives: Sandy, your pizza’s ready. Your pizza’s ready, Sandy. Interjections: Wow, are YOU in trouble. GOD it’s hot. Detached topics (Lambrecht 1994, 2001, Deulofeu forthcoming): Moi, ma mère, le salon, c’est de la moquette, le sol. ‘Me, my mother, the parlor, it’s carpet, the floor.’ Problem Solving:  Problem Solving Protoconstructions are not adaptations per se; they are the vestigial organs of the grammar. But adaptations can be seen in the (re)use of old forms to solve current communicative problems. The demands of speech production require speakers to use or adapt established routines wherever possible (Bolinger 1976). The recycling strategy is seen in grammaticalization, the creation of a grammatical marker from a word (Hurford 2003, Heine & Kuteva 2002), e.g., the English like quotative. Problem Solving:  Problem Solving The recycling strategy is also seen in certain syntactic innovations, which I will refer to as patches. I will focus on two kinds of patches: Amalgams. Nonstandard grammatical patterns that contain two contiguous or overlapping syntactic units that cannot otherwise be combined. Example: Ample negatives (Lawler 1974). Not in MY backyard you won’t. Not THIS time you won’t. Mismatch effects. Constructions that are used without their originally associated meanings. Example: Clausal complements with I think (Thompson & Mulac 1991). I think it’s working, isn’t it/*don’t I? Problem Solving:  Problem Solving What kinds of communicative problems are speakers using patches to resolve? I will discuss three such problems: Signaling a shift to a new topic while avoiding prolixity (Lambrecht 1994, Michaelis & Francis 2007). Keeping intonation breaks (pauses) aligned with the edges of grammatical units (Croft 1995). Making optimal use of a construction when it has narrow combinatoric potential. Topic Shifting:  Topic Shifting The sentence topic is the predictable participant in the predication; as such it is expressed by a pronoun or a zero: He never meows. He he doesn’t have any front claws. I had him declawed but he doesn’t bite anybody. He’s just he’s just kind of there—real friendly and docile. (Swbd) Topics can be direct objects, but they are far more likely to be subjects: 91% of subjects in English conversation are pronouns while only 34% of objects are (Michaelis & Francis 2007). Subjects are “grammaticized clause topics” (Mithun 1991: 160). A topic tends to persist over several predications, but speakers must also occasionally introduce a new topic (Walker & Prince 1996). How? Topic Shifting:  Topic Shifting The simplest strategy is to introduce the new topic in subject position: A: Wh[en]—when I got older I liked things like Caesar’s Palace. You know, that’s where I like to stay and and B: Oh yeah and oh okay you can’t you’re gonna camp out at Caesar’s Palace huh  A: Uh right exactly so this summer um my boyfriend lives in California B: Alright. A: and he loves to go camping and he s[aid]: “Let’s go camping”, and I went. (Swbd) But this practice runs afoul of Lambrecht’s Principle of Separation of Reference and Role (1994: 146): “Do not introduce a referent and talk about it in the same clause”. Topic-Shifting Patches:  Topic-Shifting Patches An alternative strategy is: introduce a new entity in direct-object position, then comment about that entity in later clauses: Like I saw someone at a Halloween party. This lady was from Turkey, and she’d been belly dancing since she was four years old. (Swbd) But effort conservation disfavors such explicit strategies, and favors patches, including left dislocation (Prince 1984): I mean, if it was really a deterrent, I mean, I think, like, horse thieves in the old West, you know, they saw other horse thieves hanging by their necks. (Swbd) All topic-shifting patches prevent a new participant from being sentence subject, including those patches that are amalgams. Topic-Shifting Amalgams:  Topic-Shifting Amalgams English: There was a ball of fire shot up through the seats in front of me. (Lambrecht 1988: 319) Or, you know, I have a friend of mine that he hasn’t seen one of his cats for, you know, like going on six weeks now. (Fisher) French (Lambrecht 2000): J’ai eu mon beau-frère qui a fait Paris-Nice. ‘My brother-in-law did Paris-Nice.’ (lit. ‘I had my brother-in-law who did P-N.’) Y a le téléphone qui sonne.‘The phone’s ringing.’ (lit. ‘There’s the phone which is ringing.’) Je vois le facteur qui arrive.‘I see the mailman coming.’ Aligning Grammatical and Prosodic Units:  Aligning Grammatical and Prosodic Units A common conversational strategy is to introduce a forthcoming assertion by means of a set-up clause (Massam 1999): Yeah, well, that’s another problem: I think to really correct the judicial system you have to get the lawyers out of it. That’s the problem is that they all ask for so much up front. Well, the problem is uh minimum wage is not enough to live on. The last strategy is the simplest, but it is problematic for speakers. Why? Aligning Grammatical and Prosodic Units:  Aligning Grammatical and Prosodic Units The construction in question is Simplex Apposition (Brenier & Michaelis 2005); its structural properties are as follows: But[NPthe thing] [VP IS [break] I always carry it with my checkbook]. Simplex violates the strong tendency for intonational breaks to align with the edges of syntactic constituents (Croft 1995, Watson & Gibson 2003). Simplex has an intonation unit that is not a grammatical unit (the set up) and it breaks the VP by putting a pause in it. Aligning Grammatical and Prosodic Units:  Aligning Grammatical and Prosodic Units There is another respect in which Simplex is weird prosodically: its finite verb is a prosodic peak, but not for the usual reason, accent deflection (Ladd 1996: ch. 5). In accent deflection, prominence shifts to the verb just in case its complement denotes a topical entity: A: I found an article for you in a German journal. B: I don’t READ German. (Ladd 1996: 175) Simplex marks is as prominent, but this can’t be explained by deflection: the clausal complement is not topical but focal. Patching an Alignment Problem:  Patching an Alignment Problem The problems with Simplex comes from the dual function that the verb be is forced to perform: Syntactic: the verb be introduces a complement clause, e.g., I always carry it with my checkbook. Discourse-pragmatic: the verb be is a focus marker, signaling forthcoming propositional content. Speakers have created a nonstandard pattern to fix the Simplex defects; I will call this pattern ISIS. Patching an Alignment Problem:  Patching an Alignment Problem ISIS is an amalgam: Right uh but [S? the thing IS] [VP that POWER involves controlling the resources for OTHER people]. See I- I AGREE with that, but MY whole problem IS is that I really don’t like BUSH. ISIS contains the front end of Simplex and the back end of an ordinary subject-predicate construction: ISIS solves Simplex problems: ISIS has an unbroken VP and an accentless is. But it creates another: what is the syntactic category of the ‘set up’ clause? The moral of the story: patches aren’t perfect. Expanding Combinatoric Potential:  Expanding Combinatoric Potential Constructions call for specific semantic and syntactic types, e,g., the English indefinite article seeks a count entity: *a foliage, *a furniture, *a mud. Speakers may intentionally violate these restrictions in order to create new semantic types (Jackendoff 1997, De Swart 1998). Examples include: a strip of towel, some pillow, a ketchup, Suddenly, I knew the answer, I’m loving it. Such mismatch effects are patches because they solve a communicative problem by leveraging existing resources. Conclusions:  Conclusions Under a construction-based view of grammar, grammar is a set of patterns, of varying degrees of internal complexity, that people use to do things. Old patterns exist alongside newer ones. Talking is hard, and part of the problem is caused by constraints on the constructions at hand. The easiest solution to a communicative problem is to create a new construction from old ones. Conclusions:  Conclusions The prevalence of the patching strategy illustrates Slobin’s (1992) point about children, adults and syntactic change: Adults are the major drivers of syntactic change because they know the grammar better and therefore know best how to extend its potential. If we want to examine grammar change, we should look at the strategies that speakers use in conversational speech.

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Crystal

Organic Farming
27. 12. 2007
0 views

Organic Farming

LA break out FINAL
17. 06. 2007
0 views

LA break out FINAL

011404New and Old Mexico
04. 10. 2007
0 views

011404New and Old Mexico

Course Guidelines
12. 09. 2007
0 views

Course Guidelines

NS102 21 S07 Desert Storm
12. 09. 2007
0 views

NS102 21 S07 Desert Storm

MehdiMoniri Bachelorseminar
12. 10. 2007
0 views

MehdiMoniri Bachelorseminar

ice hockey
06. 09. 2007
0 views

ice hockey

Experiencing Helsinki 06
06. 09. 2007
0 views

Experiencing Helsinki 06

yant
06. 09. 2007
0 views

yant

Hybrid Automata
08. 11. 2007
0 views

Hybrid Automata

Mud Sharks Flyer
06. 09. 2007
0 views

Mud Sharks Flyer

Peasants Revolt powerpoint
07. 12. 2007
0 views

Peasants Revolt powerpoint

IT S A HELL OF TORNADO for web
05. 10. 2007
0 views

IT S A HELL OF TORNADO for web

McKinsey Productivity
23. 11. 2007
0 views

McKinsey Productivity

Aging Spr06 Lect13
23. 11. 2007
0 views

Aging Spr06 Lect13

1900tot1950af
12. 11. 2007
0 views

1900tot1950af

presentation 1
04. 01. 2008
0 views

presentation 1

cspin 200011
05. 11. 2007
0 views

cspin 200011

Turkey 0105
22. 11. 2007
0 views

Turkey 0105

Iowapain
07. 11. 2007
0 views

Iowapain

ch01s3
19. 11. 2007
0 views

ch01s3

Ripe Arin Apnic
03. 01. 2008
0 views

Ripe Arin Apnic

chapter 5
14. 11. 2007
0 views

chapter 5

THAE0402
28. 09. 2007
0 views

THAE0402

Richard Harris
04. 12. 2007
0 views

Richard Harris

CERM Lecture 1A
04. 01. 2008
0 views

CERM Lecture 1A

bridgesFIU
26. 03. 2008
0 views

bridgesFIU

Aradhna aggarwal
27. 03. 2008
0 views

Aradhna aggarwal

EARTH SCIENCE SOL
07. 04. 2008
0 views

EARTH SCIENCE SOL

ASAHPERD PPP
27. 11. 2007
0 views

ASAHPERD PPP

Japan2007
30. 03. 2008
0 views

Japan2007

smith bob
09. 04. 2008
0 views

smith bob

Kiko Presentation II
10. 04. 2008
0 views

Kiko Presentation II

CMA GTS
27. 09. 2007
0 views

CMA GTS

NCH IR2005 AP
17. 04. 2008
0 views

NCH IR2005 AP

FM DVD Notes
22. 04. 2008
0 views

FM DVD Notes

Sleep Aging Well
01. 12. 2007
0 views

Sleep Aging Well

Weniger VATA Presentation 2007
06. 09. 2007
0 views

Weniger VATA Presentation 2007

lB 6augh away stress
17. 06. 2007
0 views

lB 6augh away stress

lazzaro nicole
17. 06. 2007
0 views

lazzaro nicole

laughter
17. 06. 2007
0 views

laughter

Last Mile
17. 06. 2007
0 views

Last Mile

language play
17. 06. 2007
0 views

language play

Rewrite
06. 09. 2007
0 views

Rewrite

2003 DNS Frisco
29. 10. 2007
0 views

2003 DNS Frisco

literary genres
17. 06. 2007
0 views

literary genres

Liking and Loving
17. 06. 2007
0 views

Liking and Loving

Lecture Summer school
17. 06. 2007
0 views

Lecture Summer school

lecture 18
17. 06. 2007
0 views

lecture 18

lecture 01
17. 06. 2007
0 views

lecture 01

lect14
17. 06. 2007
0 views

lect14

lect14 semantics
17. 06. 2007
0 views

lect14 semantics

Vincentvan Gogh
20. 11. 2007
0 views

Vincentvan Gogh

ClaytonNeighbors
28. 12. 2007
0 views

ClaytonNeighbors

Praesentation2003
31. 12. 2007
0 views

Praesentation2003

ct rus auto
16. 11. 2007
0 views

ct rus auto

Nenes GAPower03
02. 01. 2008
0 views

Nenes GAPower03

UD9 Quiz
20. 11. 2007
0 views

UD9 Quiz

Harrier Seminar Jan 2004
16. 11. 2007
0 views

Harrier Seminar Jan 2004

L14 comb
17. 06. 2007
0 views

L14 comb

Galo Molina
15. 11. 2007
0 views

Galo Molina

NATO STCU
01. 10. 2007
0 views

NATO STCU

cushmancvbb
05. 12. 2007
0 views

cushmancvbb

SP297
27. 11. 2007
0 views

SP297

Italu pristatymas
01. 11. 2007
0 views

Italu pristatymas

cfunited 06 ThomasBurleson
01. 12. 2007
0 views

cfunited 06 ThomasBurleson

group1presentation to post
01. 01. 2008
0 views

group1presentation to post

nenny soemiwinata
29. 09. 2007
0 views

nenny soemiwinata

CCAT06 Holland
15. 11. 2007
0 views

CCAT06 Holland

paper pansa
24. 11. 2007
0 views

paper pansa