Hugosson

Information about Hugosson

Published on January 30, 2008

Author: Tirone

Source: authorstream.com

Content

The Stockholm Trials - Congestion charge in Stockholm :  The Stockholm Trials - Congestion charge in Stockholm Muriel Beser Hugosson, PhD Congestion charging in Stockholm:  Congestion charging in Stockholm On 2 June 2003 the Stockholm City Council adopted a majority proposal to introduce congestion charging on a trial basis On 16 June 2004 the Swedish Parliament adopted The Congestion Charge Act 3 parts:  3 parts Referendum 17 september 2006 Public transport 22 August 2005 – 31 December 2006 Congestion charges 3 January – 31 July 2006 Objectives:  Objectives Reduce traffic volumes by 10-15% on the most congested roads Increase the average speed Reduce emissions of pollutants harmful to human health and of carbon dioxide Improve the urban environment as perceived by Stockholm residents Slide5:  County 6500 km2 Charging zone 47 km2 City of Stockholm 770 000 inhab. Charging zone 280 000 inhab. County 1.9 millions inhab. No barriers, no stops, no roadside payments:  No barriers, no stops, no roadside payments Amount due for payment shown at the control point Automatic identification. License plates were photographed A limited part of the car was shown on photograph Congestion charges and times:  Congestion charges and times PEAK PERIODS 7.30-8.30 a.m., 4-5.30 p.m SEK 20 EUR 2 SEMI PEAK PERIODS 7.-7.30 a.m., 8.30-9 a.m. 3.30-4 p.m., 5.30-6 p.m. SEK 15 EUR 1.5 MEDIUM-VOLUME PERIODS 6.30-7 a.m., 9 a.m.-3.30 p.m. 6-6.30 p.m. SEK 10 EUR 1 MAXIMUM CHARGE: SEK 60/day EUR 6 Evenings, Saturdays, Sundays, holidays: NO CHARGE Slide8:  Improved Public Transport 12 new express bus lines 18 bus lines with extended service Improvements of rail-bound lines 1800 new park- and-ride places These traffic categories were exempted::  These traffic categories were exempted: Emergency vehicles Vehicles with disability permits Foreign vehicles Transport services for the disabled Taxis Motorcycles Buses over 14 tons Vehicles using alternative fuel Evaluation programme:  Evaluation programme Evaluation of the Stockholm trial objectives Complete analysis (30 evaluation projects) (Before) autumn 2004 (spring 2005) (During) spring 2006 Monthly indicators - monitor changes over time Selected indicators Monthly indicators starting in October 2005, ends September 2006 “Go live” - effects after introduction Selected indicators Daily starting the 22 august 2005 during the first 2 weeks of the public transport reinforcement Daily starting the 3 January 2006 during the first 2 weeks of the congestion charging Evaluation tasks:  Evaluation tasks Car Traffic Public transport Stockholm county travel survey Business and economic impacts Retail sales, contractors, taxi, transport services etc Environment and Health effects Other studied effects Traffic safety, attitude surveys, events affecting the evaluation programme Cost benefit analysis Effects on regional economy Passages in/out of congestion charging zone 06:00 – 19:00:  -22 % passages in/out of congestion charging zone Passages in/out of congestion charging zone 06:00 – 19:00 End of trial Slide13:  Passages in/out of the congestion charging zone Time Vehicles/h 30-50% less time spent in queues :  30-50% less time spent in queues Trafikarbete:  Trafikarbete Trafikkontoret Clean vehicle sales:  Clean vehicle sales Public transport 2006 compared with 2005:  Public transport 2006 compared with 2005 Public transport 2006 compared with 2005:  Public transport 2006 compared with 2005 Many different adaptation strategies :  Many different adaptation strategies Several different ways to change travel pattern: Change route Change destination Trip chaining Max. half of the car trips were shifted to public transport New park & ride facilities were used – but a small contribution Changed departure times not a large effect Which car trips have ”disappeared”?:  Which car trips have ”disappeared”? Work/school -22% business -30% shopping/services -27% leisure -23% other -33% Where did the they go?:  Where did the they go? Work/School: To public transport Change of route Leisure, shopping/services, business and other: Not public transport Instead: Change of destination Change of route Less trips Men changed their trips more than women:  Men changed their trips more than women Men -21% Women -9% Car trips during charging time, origin or destination in city centre Traffic safety:  Traffic safety Less traffic – fewer accidents Higher travel speed – worse injuries (small effect) Time period too limited to observe accident rates Estimated reduction of personal injury accidents of 5 - 10 % within the congestion charging zone Environment and health effects:  Environment and health effects Climate effects large for a single measure Emissons were reduced in the ”right” area Inner City 9-14 % reduction County 2-3 % reduction Retail:  Retail Minor effects on the retail trade Department stores, malls and shopping centres trade increased 7 % in city (+ 7 % in nation) Small-scale shops sales -6 % (trend) Cost benefit analysis:  Cost benefit analysis Costs of the trial EUR 340 millions (revenue EUR 75 millions) Congestion tax as permanent feature EUR 76.5 millions/year – considerable values in social benefit Payback time 4 years Expansion of bus traffic as permanent feature Benefits EUR 18 millions/year Operating costs EUR 52 millions/year The objectives were fulfilled :  The objectives were fulfilled Reduce traffic volumes by 10-15% on the most congested roads Reduction of 20-25% Increase the average speed Travel times reduced 30-50%, except of E4/E20 Reduce emissions of pollutants harmful to human health and of carbon dioxide 14% reduction in city centre, 2.5% Stockholm County Improve the urban environment as perceived by Stockholm residents Difficult to measure Was it a good idea to carry out the congestion charge trial?:  Was it a good idea to carry out the congestion charge trial? Good idea Bad idea Slide29:  Yes No Stockholm 51.3 % 45.5 % County (14 Municipalities) 39.8 % 60.2 % Results of the referendum 17 Sept 2006 Lessons learned:  Lessons learned Better public transport cannot reduce road congestion on its own If congestion charge is made permanent Simple zone structure seems to work OK Charge levels and time periods can be fine-tuned Continue simplification of payment and administration Consider seasonal traffic variation Charge on E4/E20? Change of opinion when people get real experience The process efter the referendum:  The process efter the referendum Conservative Liberals have decided to introduce congestion charges in August 2007 The revenue should be used to invest in new roads in the Stockholm County No extended public transport Small changes of system Thank you! Muriel Beser Hugosson [email protected] Information on the web www.trivector.se www.stockholmsforsoket.se :  Thank you! Muriel Beser Hugosson [email protected] Information on the web www.trivector.se www.stockholmsforsoket.se

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Tirone

Orthographic Projection
09. 01. 2008
0 views

Orthographic Projection

Strategic Stdzn seminar OAS
08. 05. 2008
0 views

Strategic Stdzn seminar OAS

EGDI presentation
07. 05. 2008
0 views

EGDI presentation

Item 7 Appendix EESCP
02. 05. 2008
0 views

Item 7 Appendix EESCP

0316CIPFA olympics
02. 05. 2008
0 views

0316CIPFA olympics

tom shepard
30. 04. 2008
0 views

tom shepard

worldhunger
24. 04. 2008
0 views

worldhunger

Richard Dunn
22. 04. 2008
0 views

Richard Dunn

MILE 0409
21. 04. 2008
0 views

MILE 0409

koreanhistory
18. 04. 2008
0 views

koreanhistory

Unit V Civil War
14. 01. 2008
0 views

Unit V Civil War

nutrition
07. 02. 2008
0 views

nutrition

Ancient Greek Drama
15. 02. 2008
0 views

Ancient Greek Drama

roofframing
11. 01. 2008
0 views

roofframing

chemicalhazards
14. 01. 2008
0 views

chemicalhazards

anesthesie 2006 cornet
15. 01. 2008
0 views

anesthesie 2006 cornet

prepandehhazards
18. 01. 2008
0 views

prepandehhazards

200105Craft
19. 01. 2008
0 views

200105Craft

rcra4
20. 01. 2008
0 views

rcra4

presentation tatt
17. 01. 2008
0 views

presentation tatt

Galvatech 04 Presentation
22. 01. 2008
0 views

Galvatech 04 Presentation

turner
23. 01. 2008
0 views

turner

ASC Raws0606 final 041906
23. 01. 2008
0 views

ASC Raws0606 final 041906

Day2 091002
24. 01. 2008
0 views

Day2 091002

Jubilee Presentation Bob Smith
04. 02. 2008
0 views

Jubilee Presentation Bob Smith

April 6 2005
04. 02. 2008
0 views

April 6 2005

Mercedes
05. 02. 2008
0 views

Mercedes

060423am
25. 01. 2008
0 views

060423am

McGrath Toronto2
29. 01. 2008
0 views

McGrath Toronto2

English project presentation
14. 02. 2008
0 views

English project presentation

pps 329
14. 02. 2008
0 views

pps 329

2002 MNM Fatalilties
22. 02. 2008
0 views

2002 MNM Fatalilties

jfm DAY2 WEB
10. 01. 2008
0 views

jfm DAY2 WEB

PORTRAITS Photographers
25. 02. 2008
0 views

PORTRAITS Photographers

DiabetesandPregnancy 000
28. 02. 2008
0 views

DiabetesandPregnancy 000

A Ryan
03. 03. 2008
0 views

A Ryan

Roman Art
03. 03. 2008
0 views

Roman Art

Pro2
17. 01. 2008
0 views

Pro2

Course chp sv
22. 01. 2008
0 views

Course chp sv

Hantavirus
25. 03. 2008
0 views

Hantavirus

IoVolcanism
21. 01. 2008
0 views

IoVolcanism

Steinmetz Presentation
11. 02. 2008
0 views

Steinmetz Presentation

articles 71120 durrani
07. 04. 2008
0 views

articles 71120 durrani

CATBREEDS
13. 01. 2008
0 views

CATBREEDS

07 UseCases
11. 01. 2008
0 views

07 UseCases

l murdock
24. 01. 2008
0 views

l murdock

art study guide
25. 02. 2008
0 views

art study guide

empoverview
15. 01. 2008
0 views

empoverview

Stockholm Carnegie
12. 02. 2008
0 views

Stockholm Carnegie

39689158
09. 01. 2008
0 views

39689158

Kimmy Auto Dog Wash
10. 01. 2008
0 views

Kimmy Auto Dog Wash

file 33502505
28. 03. 2008
0 views

file 33502505

77449 55
05. 03. 2008
0 views

77449 55

saltlakecity05
13. 02. 2008
0 views

saltlakecity05

IED Lec 1 2007
06. 02. 2008
0 views

IED Lec 1 2007

proficiency
14. 01. 2008
0 views

proficiency

religiousemblems07
07. 02. 2008
0 views

religiousemblems07

CTW Presentation for Website
25. 01. 2008
0 views

CTW Presentation for Website