Johnson ANS

Information about Johnson ANS

Published on October 26, 2007

Author: Kliment

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Thorium for Use in Plutonium Disposition, Proliferation Resistant Fuels, and Future Reactors:  Thorium for Use in Plutonium Disposition, Proliferation Resistant Fuels, and Future Reactors Brian Johnson WISE 2006 ANS johnsob[email protected] This presentation focuses on the following uses of thorium:  This presentation focuses on the following uses of thorium Weapons-Grade Plutonium disposition Proliferation-resistant fuels for developing countries Reaching long-term goals of U.S. initiatives http://www.ornl.gov/sci/ees/images/nnp_bomdstobulb.gif http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/q/qt-p-nb.gif http://www.usembassy.it/file2006_02/alia/a6022102.jpg http://afci.lanl.gov/images/AFCI_Gold_Logo.jpg http://gif.inel.gov/images/forum_animation_08.gif History of Weapons-Grade Plutonium:  History of Weapons-Grade Plutonium During the Cold War the United States and Soviet Union made vast arsenals of nuclear weapons In 1994 the National Academy of Science deemed the stockpiles a "clear and present danger to national and international security." http://www.iaea.org/inis/aws/fnss/fulltext/te_1319_31.pdf U.S./Russia Parallel Disposition:  U.S./Russia Parallel Disposition In 2000 the U.S. and Russia formally agreed to the disposition of 34 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium each The final form of the plutonium must meet the “spent-fuel standard” Mixed oxide (MOX) fuel using weapons-grade plutonium was agreed upon as the best method MOX Woes:  MOX Woes The original goal was to implement MOX by 2007 and disposition 2 metric tons per year This goal will not be reached due to lack of funding in Russia, management problems, and delays in the U.S. The House and Senate have authorized limited funding until the Secretary of Energy can make some certifications Secretary of Energy Must Certify:  Secretary of Energy Must Certify Given Sunk Costs of MOX, compared to other technologies MOX is still the best option The Department of Energy has an action plan to fix management problems An independent cost estimate of the MOX project the Department of Energy intends to use MOX regardless of what Russia decides to do House Requirements: Senate Requirements: Thorium as an option:  Thorium as an option Thorium-based fuels designed for plutonium disposition are more than twice as effective at disposing plutonium than MOX Fewer, or no modifications to current reactors Around two to three years from implementation Recommendation:  Recommendation A $4 million dollar program pursuing thorium-based fuel design for use in U.S. reactors should be pursued This could be sponsored by those who have supported the funding for the program in Russia, such as Curt Weldon http://www.thoriumpower.com/images/elmash%20fuel%20assembly.jpg Proliferation-Resistant Fuels for Developing Countries:  Proliferation-Resistant Fuels for Developing Countries The U.S. outlines a desire in GNEP to help developing countries set up nuclear power These facilities will provide potable water, heat for industrial processes and electricity They are in less secure areas and must be inherently more resistant to proliferation Small reactors with long fuel lives and low plutonium output are recommended Thorium-based fuel designed for proliferation resistance can meet some of these goals India, Canada, and Heavy Water Reactors:  India, Canada, and Heavy Water Reactors If developing nations are not provided with more proliferation resistant technologies they may choose heavy water reactors No need for pressure vessel No need for enrichment Spent-fuel from heavy water reactors contains plutonium between weapons-grade and typical reactor grade India used plutonium from their first heavy water reactor to build their first weapon Features of Thorium-Based Proliferation-Resistant Fuels:  Features of Thorium-Based Proliferation-Resistant Fuels Annual plutonium output is reduced by a factor of 7 The fissile percentage in the discharged plutonium is around 60%, compared to around 70% in typical spent fuel Heat generation of plutonium increase Weapons made of discharged plutonium are more likely to “fizzle” Recommendation:  Recommendation While thorium-based fuels aren’t a perfect answer, it is better to take steps now to assure some extra level of proliferation resistance Since the fuel design is very similar to the plutonium disposition design, the research program recommended before could also include a proliferation resistant design at a marginal extra cost Long-Term Goals:  Long-Term Goals The Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative as a major part of GNEP Generation IV Initiative Basic objectives Reduce Waste Improve Economics Improve Proliferation-Resistance Molten Salt Reactor: A Possible Solution:  Molten Salt Reactor: A Possible Solution Meets all goals set forth by both the AFCI and the Gen-IV Initiative, notably a top rating in sustainability U.S. operating experience, yet no current funding http://nuclear.inl.gov/gen4/i/msr.gif Molten Salt Reactor Issues:  Molten Salt Reactor Issues Technical Barriers Proliferation resistant characteristics Cost to operate Recent research on AMSTER in France shows issues to be resolvable especially if optimized for waste recution http://nuclear.inl.gov/gen4/i/msr.gif Recommendations:  Recommendations The United States must do a modern system-wide analysis comparing the current GNEP plan to molten salt reactors If found to be a competitive solution, the United States should fund some research to advance molten salt reactor technology through the AFCI, Gen-IV, or both Summary:  Summary Thorium technologies could help reach some United States political goals and should be researched for: Plutonium Disposition Proliferation Resistant Fuel Molten Salt Reactor Questions?:  Questions?

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Kliment

Julius Caesar
01. 11. 2007
0 views

Julius Caesar

Because of Winn Dixie Irivarren
24. 02. 2008
0 views

Because of Winn Dixie Irivarren

costs
04. 10. 2007
0 views

costs

Feroci LNF7may07
29. 10. 2007
0 views

Feroci LNF7may07

cultural dimensions
28. 11. 2007
0 views

cultural dimensions

savanna st
29. 11. 2007
0 views

savanna st

A C 16 US CHAPTER
31. 10. 2007
0 views

A C 16 US CHAPTER

00 19 pp7
05. 11. 2007
0 views

00 19 pp7

Ninja
20. 11. 2007
0 views

Ninja

Eng DeutscheConference 2004
23. 11. 2007
0 views

Eng DeutscheConference 2004

obesidade infantil
28. 12. 2007
0 views

obesidade infantil

Hydro Forming
02. 01. 2008
0 views

Hydro Forming

mental health powerpoint
04. 01. 2008
0 views

mental health powerpoint

gogel
04. 01. 2008
0 views

gogel

Final Ghana presentation sophie
04. 01. 2008
0 views

Final Ghana presentation sophie

Civil Security
07. 01. 2008
0 views

Civil Security

Displacement GK 4th
06. 11. 2007
0 views

Displacement GK 4th

23 7 2007enghlish
24. 10. 2007
0 views

23 7 2007enghlish

gas
30. 10. 2007
0 views

gas

heckls
15. 11. 2007
0 views

heckls

SmokeFree Workplace Policies
07. 12. 2007
0 views

SmokeFree Workplace Policies

annualresults0304
20. 02. 2008
0 views

annualresults0304

Chapter 15 Section 4
27. 02. 2008
0 views

Chapter 15 Section 4

Hartz2
16. 11. 2007
0 views

Hartz2

vedbhawan
13. 12. 2007
0 views

vedbhawan

nemo 4
03. 01. 2008
0 views

nemo 4

Advice for US Companies in China
15. 11. 2007
0 views

Advice for US Companies in China

LondonPreDepartureIn tern2008
14. 03. 2008
0 views

LondonPreDepartureIn tern2008

AnneMurphy
27. 03. 2008
0 views

AnneMurphy

Lt4 OpportunitySearch
30. 03. 2008
0 views

Lt4 OpportunitySearch

canCanadaVendorRequi rements
06. 11. 2007
0 views

canCanadaVendorRequi rements

MZ Investor Presentation Nov 07
13. 04. 2008
0 views

MZ Investor Presentation Nov 07

catalog bbc
22. 11. 2007
0 views

catalog bbc

2003 10 28 wendy
01. 12. 2007
0 views

2003 10 28 wendy

strategia
21. 11. 2007
0 views

strategia

alternative therapies
05. 12. 2007
0 views

alternative therapies

Repro 2007 Behague
02. 01. 2008
0 views

Repro 2007 Behague

celtico
06. 11. 2007
0 views

celtico

narrows2s
08. 11. 2007
0 views

narrows2s

MASINT5 Industry Brief Approved
30. 12. 2007
0 views

MASINT5 Industry Brief Approved

VGLAscoringguidelines
24. 12. 2007
0 views

VGLAscoringguidelines

O is for Oklahoma
03. 10. 2007
0 views

O is for Oklahoma

uiuc indri
16. 11. 2007
0 views

uiuc indri

Lecture3 History Fall 2007
05. 01. 2008
0 views

Lecture3 History Fall 2007

lis510n06a 02
30. 10. 2007
0 views

lis510n06a 02

PR Strauss
01. 11. 2007
0 views

PR Strauss