Justice and Equality

Information about Justice and Equality

Published on December 14, 2007

Author: Tarzen

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Chapter 10 – Justice and Equality:  Chapter 10 – Justice and Equality What is justice? Slide2:  What is justice : generally similar to fairness. Justice has been defined as treatment in accordance with desert. Justice:  Justice 1.      Justice has to do with how human beings treat each other. Generally, if someone is born with a disease, we do not claim they have been treated unjustly. 2. Justice is past looking. Justice:  Justice 3.      Justice is individualistic. Collectivism is generally considered unethical. I can’t collect your test grades, average them out and give everyone the same grade because some students deserve higher grades and some students deserve lower grades. Collectivist thinking can be a result of either hasty or sweeping generalizations. Any time we lump a group of people together and try to make judgments about them. The poor, the rich, African Americans, Hispanics, women, men, and so on. There are individual differences within groups. Some people are skilled and some are unskilled. Some may be lazy and some may be hardworking, and so forth. After World War II people tended to associate Germans with Nazi’s but obviously all German’s were not Nazi’s so this was to label some people unfairly.Is collectivism ever justified? Insurance rates? Unjust, but the only way to make it just would involve a lot of work that would raise rates for everyone. 4. Comparative justice – was Martha Stewart treated more harshly because she was a women? Justice:  Justice Justice as equal treatment: Everyone should be treated equally. What does this mean? Students with good home lives vs. those with terrible home lives. Those with no breakfast vs. those with breakfast. Those that catch on quickly vs. those that don’t. Utilitarian method might say to spend more time with smart students. If a special needs child is placed in a separate class is the child being treated equally? It is hard to figure out in small cases? How in the world would you do it in society? Justice:  Justice Two people get 90% on a paper. They are numerically identical but qualitatively different. Equal treatment: We don’t take an innocent and a guilty person and tell them to split a 10 year sentence because the innocent person does not deserve to serve jail time. So nobody should get special treatment. But what about the president with body guards? Justice and Discrimination :  Justice and Discrimination What does it mean to discriminate? Discrimination originally meant to choose Shouldn’t choose for irrelevant reasons. Now we have to decide what is relevant and what is not. If a teacher gives a higher grade to a student because he/she is sexually attractive, then that is not just, because sexual attractiveness is irrelevant to what grade a student should get. Discrimination:  Discrimination What about an employee who only takes a bath twice a year?  What about inviting people to a party? People discriminate all of the time. But is it an injustice?  Is it an injustice if you are an employer and required by law not to discriminate based on race or gender? Some employers think it is discrimination because it is their money and they should have the right to hire whoever they want.  Some features which we can’t control are sometimes relevant. Maybe a bouncer at a bar should be strong, a football player needs to be big and so forth. What about overweight bartenders? What about hiring a few women that can do a job but distract the men? Is it just to let them go? Discrimination:  Discrimination What about gay teachers? Some say that gay teachers will prey on children but evidence does not back that up. There is a larger proportion of heterosexual teachers who prey on girls than of homosexual teachers that prey on boys. Should we get rid of all male teachers? If someone can’t stand the thought of a gay teacher than should the gay teacher not be allowed to teach or should the person learn to stand it. Or not discriminate even if they can’t stand it. Female reporters are allowed into male locker rooms. Do minority groups deserve preferences because other members of their group have been discriminated against? Do people in minority groups deserve preference because they have suffered from past discrimination?  Problem with discrimination: it is hard to get out of it. Criteria of Desert:  Criteria of Desert Egalitarianism (page 329) - Equality of opportunity – What does equality of opportunity mean? Can we give everyone an equal opportunity. Effort – Is each according to their effort just? How do we know if someone is really trying as hard as they could? What if their project is a failure? Should they be rewarded as much as a person that has a successful project? What about grades? Should someone that tries really hard but fails every test get an ‘A’ for effort? Do employers care about effort? Need – page 335 Achievement – does improvement count? Generally, is the student able to master the material? Justice:  Justice Justice and impartiality – stalkers, when can you shoot at someone? The veil of ignorance – distributive justice – Rawls Rawls:  Rawls Rawls argues that he has a theory wherein he can provide the framework for a just society. In A Theory of Justice, he claims a just society can be established by a unanimous consensus of players, because each player is to vote for the framework of their society behind a veil of ignorance. According to Rawls, each and every single rational person will use a maximin approach with regard to their decision-making strategies. The maximin rule states that all rational individuals will always avoid the worst possible outcome if there is a possibility of grave danger. Rawls claims this strategy would not be employed for every decision an individual would make but that it would certainly apply when the worst possible outcome is a lifetime of abject poverty, death, or a dire situation for future generations of your family. If we did not know what our lot in life would be behind the hypothetical veil of ignorance, we would be just to everyone (because we could be anyone) – the theory is that I would be in favor of women’s rights, etc...because I wouldn’t know if I would be a women or not. I would be in favor of protecting the disadvantaged because I might be the disadvantaged. Rawls calls his justice distributive justice. Nozick:  Nozick Contrast with Nozick: Nozick gives a very famous (infamous?)Wilt Chamberlain example to show that freedom of transfer makes equality, as well as any end-state theories, impossible to achieve. “Wilt Chamberlain is greatly in demand by basketball teams, being a great gate attraction...He signs the following sort of contract with a team: In each home game, twenty-five cents from the price of each ticket of admission goes to him...The season starts, and people cheerfully attend his team’s games; they buy their tickets, each time dropping a separate twenty five cents of their admission price into a special box with Chamberlain’s name on it...Let us suppose that in one season one million persons attend his home games, and Wilt Chamberlain ends up with $250,000, a much larger sum than the average income and larger even than anyone else has. Is he entitled to this income? Is this new distribution D2, unjust?” Nozick:  Nozick Nozick argues that the only way to enforce D1 is to forbid voluntary exchanges. I should also mention Nozick’s argument about side constraints. He writes, “...the stronger the force of an end-state maximizing view, the more powerful must be the root idea capable of resisting it that underlies the existence of moral side constraints.” He points out that each of us are distinct individuals that are not resources for others. If anyone wishes to dispute this particular side constraint then they must choose from three alternatives. (1) he must reject all side constraints; (2) he must produce a different explanation of why there are moral side constraints rather than simply a goal-directed maximizing structure, an explanation that doesn’t itself entail the libertarian side constraint; or (3) he must accept the strongly put root idea about the separateness of individuals and yet claim that initiating aggression against another is compatible with this root idea. Nozick and Rawls:  Nozick and Rawls There are criticisms of argument that voluntary exchange is always moral and only voluntary exchange is more. Some critics also question his use of the term voluntary because he argues that force and fraud are prohibited but exploitation and misunderstood contracts are ok. Nozick also confronts Rawls argument that we are all just winners or losers of some natural lottery. Rawls has argued that talent is undeserved, thus why should people that win the natural lottery fare better than those that don’t? Rawls even goes on to say that people that cultivate their talents have probably learned to cultivate them through some sort of natural lottery (good parents, natural abilities, and so forth.) Nozick and Rawls:  Nozick and Rawls Nozick disagrees with Rawls. He writes: “This line of argument can succeed in blocking the introduction of a person’s autonomous choice and actions (and their results) only by attributing everything noteworthy about the person to certain sorts of ‘external’ factors. So denigrating a person’s autonomy and prime responsibility for his actions is a risky line to take for a theory that otherwise wishes to buttress the dignity and self – respect of autonomous beings.”

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Tarzen

FastFood
24. 02. 2008
0 views

FastFood

Money Banking
14. 04. 2008
0 views

Money Banking

Nature nurture
04. 09. 2007
0 views

Nature nurture

tolkein presentation
04. 09. 2007
0 views

tolkein presentation

chapter08
16. 06. 2007
0 views

chapter08

Data Storage 1
16. 06. 2007
0 views

Data Storage 1

Best Practices
17. 04. 2008
0 views

Best Practices

Community Workshop Seminar
17. 04. 2008
0 views

Community Workshop Seminar

mohamed ariff and greg lopez
13. 04. 2008
0 views

mohamed ariff and greg lopez

20011105e1
10. 04. 2008
0 views

20011105e1

s2 dewulf
09. 04. 2008
0 views

s2 dewulf

AAAS
07. 04. 2008
0 views

AAAS

D200510 06 GermanETRforJapan
30. 03. 2008
0 views

D200510 06 GermanETRforJapan

sez10
28. 03. 2008
0 views

sez10

SouthAfrica
21. 09. 2007
0 views

SouthAfrica

Scanning Tunneling Microscope
21. 09. 2007
0 views

Scanning Tunneling Microscope

chem lab bonding 05
12. 10. 2007
0 views

chem lab bonding 05

ClassifyAnimals
12. 10. 2007
0 views

ClassifyAnimals

desc fashion en
18. 10. 2007
0 views

desc fashion en

36 Isaiah and the Mountains
04. 09. 2007
0 views

36 Isaiah and the Mountains

Lecture 6
05. 10. 2007
0 views

Lecture 6

Berlin Conference
26. 10. 2007
0 views

Berlin Conference

Vietnam
07. 12. 2007
0 views

Vietnam

mobisys tutorial hardware
29. 10. 2007
0 views

mobisys tutorial hardware

ne tutorial
01. 11. 2007
0 views

ne tutorial

Koranteng MFRD
04. 09. 2007
0 views

Koranteng MFRD

korea
07. 11. 2007
0 views

korea

Salma Hayek
12. 11. 2007
0 views

Salma Hayek

global stanton
22. 10. 2007
0 views

global stanton

Success risk factor
16. 11. 2007
0 views

Success risk factor

0738001
19. 11. 2007
0 views

0738001

Funny Not So
18. 08. 2007
0 views

Funny Not So

earthhistory
03. 10. 2007
0 views

earthhistory

peda2
22. 10. 2007
0 views

peda2

Gavin cholera risk prediction
04. 09. 2007
0 views

Gavin cholera risk prediction

2006 09 13DeepakAgarwal
23. 10. 2007
0 views

2006 09 13DeepakAgarwal

Oak Hill2
04. 01. 2008
0 views

Oak Hill2

informedegestion2005
22. 10. 2007
0 views

informedegestion2005

ClosingSession2005
07. 01. 2008
0 views

ClosingSession2005

vogel games
07. 11. 2007
0 views

vogel games

Obesity and Risk Factor
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Obesity and Risk Factor

Linda Simoni Wastila
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Linda Simoni Wastila

mbti students intro only team
07. 08. 2007
0 views

mbti students intro only team

Module14
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Module14

mmo 42
07. 08. 2007
0 views

mmo 42

Localization Week 2
27. 11. 2007
0 views

Localization Week 2

Clinica
28. 12. 2007
0 views

Clinica

GMV DP Wizard
21. 09. 2007
0 views

GMV DP Wizard

Milner China IndiaGEP
16. 10. 2007
0 views

Milner China IndiaGEP

Lecture 31 Power Point
28. 12. 2007
0 views

Lecture 31 Power Point

sessionr 9 12 13 1107
24. 02. 2008
0 views

sessionr 9 12 13 1107

Making Your Home Safer
26. 02. 2008
0 views

Making Your Home Safer

contextualized learning
28. 02. 2008
0 views

contextualized learning

disarmament
04. 03. 2008
0 views

disarmament

ogot
07. 08. 2007
0 views

ogot

installing globus
19. 06. 2007
0 views

installing globus

JPW Talk AHM2005 MAIN
19. 06. 2007
0 views

JPW Talk AHM2005 MAIN

jensen rockwell seesymp02
19. 06. 2007
0 views

jensen rockwell seesymp02

ipv6 workshop plzak 28oct02
19. 06. 2007
0 views

ipv6 workshop plzak 28oct02

ipfrr kvalbein
19. 06. 2007
0 views

ipfrr kvalbein

Clast Mind L M 2210
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Clast Mind L M 2210

brochure 2
19. 06. 2007
0 views

brochure 2

Brandmeldeanlage
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Brandmeldeanlage

birnecker cms
19. 06. 2007
0 views

birnecker cms

belleville ppthistory
19. 06. 2007
0 views

belleville ppthistory

belleville ppt2K
19. 06. 2007
0 views

belleville ppt2K

launchevent final fnr
15. 11. 2007
0 views

launchevent final fnr

IETF 68 P2PSIP Agenda
19. 06. 2007
0 views

IETF 68 P2PSIP Agenda

MSM Slides2005
07. 08. 2007
0 views

MSM Slides2005

lacnic V APNIC Report
19. 06. 2007
0 views

lacnic V APNIC Report

learning style roles 2007 05 15
07. 08. 2007
0 views

learning style roles 2007 05 15

icse
19. 06. 2007
0 views

icse

Global Johnny Appleseed Project
02. 11. 2007
0 views

Global Johnny Appleseed Project

belleville flash
19. 06. 2007
0 views

belleville flash

NaTang Inverse
07. 08. 2007
0 views

NaTang Inverse

Ramos Lab Tour
04. 10. 2007
0 views

Ramos Lab Tour

interims 2003b
19. 06. 2007
0 views

interims 2003b

kao tai BASS 2004
07. 08. 2007
0 views

kao tai BASS 2004

Rhew02
03. 01. 2008
0 views

Rhew02

Dale Tongue
16. 06. 2007
0 views

Dale Tongue

CS598STK Terra
16. 06. 2007
0 views

CS598STK Terra

Computer Essentials
16. 06. 2007
0 views

Computer Essentials

Coming SL 7 Overview
16. 06. 2007
0 views

Coming SL 7 Overview

CLI220 Mark Minasi
16. 06. 2007
0 views

CLI220 Mark Minasi

bpm keynote
16. 06. 2007
0 views

bpm keynote

beyond soa
16. 06. 2007
0 views

beyond soa

Intro OO Neuf
19. 06. 2007
0 views

Intro OO Neuf

PBOCFrance051219alsd1
23. 11. 2007
0 views

PBOCFrance051219alsd1

MOS384 Sel 07 test
07. 08. 2007
0 views

MOS384 Sel 07 test

NT 512B 2
07. 08. 2007
0 views

NT 512B 2

CP1 Commo
16. 06. 2007
0 views

CP1 Commo

Mark Carpenter
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Mark Carpenter

ma chap8
07. 08. 2007
0 views

ma chap8

Basic2
03. 10. 2007
0 views

Basic2

IPAM concluding workshop
19. 06. 2007
0 views

IPAM concluding workshop

michael cantor
07. 08. 2007
0 views

michael cantor

ietf 63 enum validation v01
19. 06. 2007
0 views

ietf 63 enum validation v01

KSU Speech1
07. 08. 2007
0 views

KSU Speech1

Mumulus Presentation
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Mumulus Presentation

bethel
19. 06. 2007
0 views

bethel

Mgt 201 Personality Differences
07. 08. 2007
0 views

Mgt 201 Personality Differences

ISSUES presentation
19. 06. 2007
0 views

ISSUES presentation

internet sec
19. 06. 2007
0 views

internet sec

Sathaye
24. 11. 2007
0 views

Sathaye

kline
07. 08. 2007
0 views

kline

wg2 t6
23. 10. 2007
0 views

wg2 t6

KNIT
20. 11. 2007
0 views

KNIT

Multicam2
07. 01. 2008
0 views

Multicam2

bilingual poll march2004
19. 06. 2007
0 views

bilingual poll march2004

NASC1 Lucken
07. 08. 2007
0 views

NASC1 Lucken

Corel Corporation
16. 06. 2007
0 views

Corel Corporation