Lect07BehFin

Information about Lect07BehFin

Published on October 2, 2007

Author: Chloe

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Lecture 7: Behavioral Finance:  Lecture 7: Behavioral Finance The Role of Psychology Questionnaire, Part I Give 90% Confidence Interval:  Questionnaire, Part I Give 90% Confidence Interval How much does the Statue of Liberty weigh, in tons? (entire steel-reinforced copper figure) What is the 2000 population of Turkey? How many square miles in Sahara Desert? Endowment of Yale University as reported in 1998-9 Support of Education Survey? How much, in dollars, does one receive if one wins the Pulitzer Prize (2001)? Questionnaire, Part II Give 90% Confidence Interval:  Questionnaire, Part II Give 90% Confidence Interval 6. US Population in first census (1790) 7. US Traffic fatalities New Years Day 1/1/98 8. Connecticut land area, square miles 9. Height of Mount Everest 10. 100-meter dash winner, time in seconds, 1896 Olympics Overconfidence:  Overconfidence From my October, 1987 Investor Survey: “Did you think at any point on October 19, 1987 that you had a pretty good idea when the market would rebound?” Institutional: 29% yes, Individual 28% yes Among buyers: 47%, 48% “If yes, what made you think you knew when a rebound would occur? Answers: “intuition,” “gut feeling,” “common sense” Prospect Theory:  Prospect Theory Kahneman and Tversky, Econometrica 1979 Two elements, value function and weighting function Elements replace utility function and probabilities in expected utility theory Samuelson’s Lunch Colleague:  Samuelson’s Lunch Colleague Paul Samuelson offered two-to-one odds to his colleague: colleague wins $200 if heads, loses $100 if tails. Colleague refused bet. Samuelson asked him if he would take 100 such bets. Colleague said yes. Samuelson proved mathematically that his colleague was not rational (from expected utility theory). [Scientia 98:108-13, 1963] Allais Paradox:  Allais Paradox Which do you prefer: 25% chance of winning $3000 and a 20% chance of winning $4000? [35%,65%] Which do you prefer: 100% chance of winning $3000 or an 80% chance of winning $4000? [80%,20%] Regret Theory:  Regret Theory Prospect of regret pain generates avoidance behavior People avoid selling stocks that have gone down in value, rush to sell those that have gone up (disposition effect). Cognitive Dissonance:  Cognitive Dissonance Mental conflict that occurs when one learns one’s beliefs are wrong, avoidance behavior Ads for recently purchased cars Disposition effect Wishful Thinking Bias:  Wishful Thinking Bias People exaggerate probability that their team will win. People exaggerate probability that the candidate they favor will win. Attention Anomalies:  Attention Anomalies Attention is fundamental aspect of human intelligence and its limits Social basis for attention Inability to account for one’s attention “No arbitrage assumption” of financial theory: No ten-dollar bills lying around. Does not require everyone is paying attention. Anchoring:  Anchoring Kahneman & Tversky wheel of fortune experiment Subjects unaware of their own anchoring behavior Examples: stock prices anchored to past values, or to other stock prices in same country. Mental Compartments:  Mental Compartments Shefrin & Thaler: Compartments: current wage, asset, and future. Shefrin & Statman: Investors have a “safe” part of their portfolio that they will not risk, and a “risky” part of their portfolio that they can have fun with Representativeness Heuristic:  Representativeness Heuristic People judge by similarity to familiar types, without regard to base rate probabilities (sensitive, artistic woman, sculptress or bank teller) Tendency to see patterns in what is really random walk Disjunction Effect:  Disjunction Effect Inability to make a decision that is contingent on future information Shafir & Tversky: People who took one of Samuelson’s lunch colleague bet were asked if they would take another. Most took the second bet whether or not they won the first. But most would not take second bet before outcome of first was known. Reaction of stock market to news Gambling Behavior:  Gambling Behavior 61% of US adults gambled in 1974. 1.1% of men and 0.5% of women are compulsive gamblers Gamblers’ Anonymous Gambling associated with self esteem and competence Generates an aroused state that chases away cares Magical Thinking:  Magical Thinking B. F. Skinner 1948, fed hungry pigeons mechanically at 15-second intervals. Pigeons developed superstitions Stock market responses to events may have similar origins Quasi-Magical Thinking:  Quasi-Magical Thinking Newcomb’s Paradox (named after William Newcomb of Livermore Labs by Robert Nozick, 1969, reformulated by Shafir & Tversky): Subject plays a game with a computer, and is told that the consumer can predict from his behavior what he will do. Two boxes appear on computer screen. Subject is told that computer knows pretty well whether subject will choose box A or both box A and B. Computer puts $1000 in box A, and $1000,000 in box B if it thinks subject will choose box B alone, otherwise puts nothing in box B. Quasi Magical Thinking II:  Quasi Magical Thinking II Langer: People bet more on coin not yet tossed. People pay more for lottery ticket in which they choose the number Culture and Social Contagion:  Culture and Social Contagion Social cognition, collective memory Durkheim, 1897, suicide rates differ across countries for no more reason than different cultural themes A global culture in today’s world

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Chloe

14 Questionnaire Design 2006
15. 11. 2007
0 views

14 Questionnaire Design 2006

EGEE2006
27. 09. 2007
0 views

EGEE2006

softball flex
28. 11. 2007
0 views

softball flex

ebay
16. 11. 2007
0 views

ebay

pt10
16. 11. 2007
0 views

pt10

comp inequality a
19. 11. 2007
0 views

comp inequality a

abc
20. 11. 2007
0 views

abc

Turkey 2004
23. 11. 2007
0 views

Turkey 2004

Computer nirvana
18. 12. 2007
0 views

Computer nirvana

coldwar 1
19. 12. 2007
0 views

coldwar 1

Networking
29. 12. 2007
0 views

Networking

unit10 ch03
30. 12. 2007
0 views

unit10 ch03

ch29
31. 12. 2007
0 views

ch29

Wk3Lec3
05. 01. 2008
0 views

Wk3Lec3

IntroToJavaCrypto
07. 01. 2008
0 views

IntroToJavaCrypto

SampleDP
28. 11. 2007
0 views

SampleDP

appx03
02. 01. 2008
0 views

appx03

Enrollment Market Share Report
19. 02. 2008
0 views

Enrollment Market Share Report

regionalgeology
22. 11. 2007
0 views

regionalgeology

Diversification2
24. 02. 2008
0 views

Diversification2

m ress
26. 02. 2008
0 views

m ress

2 TRB Daytona Stryker
28. 02. 2008
0 views

2 TRB Daytona Stryker

02 Abrams SIO Tumor Board Cases
04. 03. 2008
0 views

02 Abrams SIO Tumor Board Cases

UnitFiveBookThree
12. 03. 2008
0 views

UnitFiveBookThree

Innovation Appear Networks
14. 03. 2008
0 views

Innovation Appear Networks

Persuasive Writing Unit 1
18. 03. 2008
0 views

Persuasive Writing Unit 1

Recommended Memoirs1
30. 03. 2008
0 views

Recommended Memoirs1

wpf7
01. 12. 2007
0 views

wpf7

CSIRO
13. 04. 2008
0 views

CSIRO

SJRG EXH 11
01. 11. 2007
0 views

SJRG EXH 11

ASN1006
15. 11. 2007
0 views

ASN1006

OOGA 811 PUC Deployment Workshop
05. 12. 2007
0 views

OOGA 811 PUC Deployment Workshop

bls 56 79
13. 11. 2007
0 views

bls 56 79

ECW Novotny
30. 12. 2007
0 views

ECW Novotny

Friendsofalaqsaslide show
18. 12. 2007
0 views

Friendsofalaqsaslide show

Diedre Caldbeck
04. 01. 2008
0 views

Diedre Caldbeck

Sherman Stanley
29. 12. 2007
0 views

Sherman Stanley

EnigmaFinal
01. 01. 2008
0 views

EnigmaFinal

No Student is an Island
02. 11. 2007
0 views

No Student is an Island