Navarra

Information about Navarra

Published on November 7, 2007

Author: Rosalie

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Slide1:  Pierre Auger Observatory for UHE Cosmic Rays Gianni Navarra (INFN-University of Torino) for the Pierre Auger Collaboration XXXXth Rencontres de Moriond ElectroWeak Interactions and Unified Theories La Thuile 5-12th March 2005 • Science Case: the need for Auger • Principles and Advantages of a Hybrid Detector • Present Status of the Observatory • First preliminary Data • Perspectives Pierre Auger Collaboration:  Pierre Auger Collaboration Spokesperson: Alan Watson 16 Countries 50 Institutions ~350 Scientists Italy Argentina Czech Republic Australia France Brazil Germany Bolivia* Greece Mexico Poland USA Slovenia Vietnam* Spain United Kingdom *Associate Countries UHE Cosmic Rays:  UHE Cosmic Rays Eo >1020 eV: 1 part / (km2 century sr)  102 – 103 km2 collecting areas Surface particle detectors UHE Cosmic Rays:  atmospheric fluorescence detectors UHE Cosmic Rays Eo >1020 eV: 1 part / (km2 century sr)  102 – 103 km2 collecting areas Atmospheric fluorescence detectors HiRes vs AGASA:  HiRes vs AGASA AGASA HiReS D. Bergmann ~ 30 % Syst. Error Atmospheric fluorescence detectors Surface particle detectors GZK?:  GZK? Cosmic ray sources are close by (<100 Mpc) Dq ~ degree  Sources !!! Astrophysics? Relic Particles in Galactic Halo ?:  Relic Particles in Galactic Halo ? Mrelic = 1022 eV; SUSY evolution, n-body decay 2 8 16 + Composition (p,…Fe,g,n) + Astronomy (point sources) Sakar & Toldrà, Nucl.Phys.B621:495-520,2002 Toldrà, astro-ph/0201151 Fundamental Physics ? Required to solve EHECR-Puzzle::  Required to solve EHECR-Puzzle: • Better understanding of Syst. Errors • Better Resolution in Energy and Direction • Much more Statistics Hybrid Approach: Independent EAS-observation techniques Shower-by-Shower in one Experiment  Much larger Experiment Slide9:  Atmospheric fluorescence detectors Atmospheric fluorescence detectors UHE Cosmic Rays with Auger Eo >1020 eV: 1 part / (km2 century sr)  102 – 103 km2 collecting areas Surface particle detectors Atmospheric fluorescence detectors Southern Site:  70 km Southern Site Pampa Amarilla; Province of Mendoza 3000 km2, 875 g/cm2, 1400 m Lat.: 35.5° south Surface Array: 1600 Water Tanks 1.5 km spacing 3000 km2 Fluorescence Detectors: 4 Sites 6 Telescopes per site (180° x 30°) 24 Telescopes total View of Los Leones Fluorescence Site:  View of Los Leones Fluorescence Site Six Telescopes viewing 30°x30° each:  Six Telescopes viewing 30°x30° each Slide13:  Schmidt Telescope using 11 m2 mirrors Slide14:  Coihueco (fully operational) Los Leones (fully operational) Aligned Water Tanks as seen from Los Leones:  Aligned Water Tanks as seen from Los Leones Water Tank in the Pampa:  Water Tank in the Pampa Installation Chain:  Installation Chain Southern Site as of Febr. 2005:  650 Water Tanks (out of 1600) + 12 Telescopes Southern Site as of Febr. 2005 Calibration:  Calibration SD Calibration by Single Muon Triggers:  SD Calibration by Single Muon Triggers Agreement with GEANT4 Simulation up to 10  VEM (Vertical Equivalent Muons). VEM ~ 100 PE /PMT Huge Statistics! Systematic error ~5% VEM Peak Sum PMT 1 PMT 2 PMT 3 Local EM Shower SD calibration & monitoring:  SD calibration & monitoring single muons Noise Base-Temperature vs Time Signal-Height vs Time Signal-Height vs Base-Temp Single tank response Huge Statistics! Systematic error ~5% ± 3% FD Calibration :  All agreed within 10% for the EA Alternative techniques for cross checks Scattered light from laser beam Calibr. light source flown on balloon FD Calibration Absolute: End to End Calibration A Drum device installed at the aperture uniformly illuminates the camera with light from a calibrated source (1/month) Relative: UV LED + optical fibers (1/night) N Photons at diaphragm  FADC counts Mirror Camera Calibrated light source Diffusely reflective drum Drum from outside telescope building Atmospheric Monitoring:  Atmospheric Monitoring Balloon probes  (T,p)-profiles LIDAR at each FD building Central laser facility (fibre linked to tank) light attenuation length Aerosol concentration steerable LIDAR facilities located at each FD eye • LIDAR at each eye • cloud monitors at each eye • central laser facility • regular balloon flights Performance demonstrated by First Preliminary Data:  Performance demonstrated by First Preliminary Data Vertical (q~35o) & Inclined (q~72o) :  Vertical (q~35o) & Inclined (q~72o) Energy ~ (6-7) 10 19 eV 35 tanks ~ 13 km 14 km 14 tanks ~ 7 km Young & Old Shower:  Young & Old Shower ‘young’ shower ‘old’ shower Vertical vs Horizontal Showers:  Vertical vs Horizontal Showers ‘young’ showers • Wide time distribution • Strong curvature • Steep lateral distribution ‘old’ showers • Narrow time distribution • Weak curvature • Flat lateral distribution ~ 0.2 µs A Big One: ~1020 eV, q ~60°:  (m) ~11020eV ~1020eV Lateral Distribution Function ~ 14 km ~ 8 km A Big One: ~1020 eV, q ~60° 34 tanks ~60° propagation time of 40 µs EAS as seen by FD-cameras:  EAS as seen by FD-cameras Only pixels with ≥ 40 pe/100 ns are shown (10 MHz FADC  ≤ 4 g/cm2; 12 bit resol., 15 bit dynamic range) Pixel-size = 1.5° ; light spot: 0.65° (90%) 1019 eV events trigger up to ~ 30 km Two-Mirror event EAS as seen by FD-cameras Energy Reconstruction:  Energy Reconstruction Integral of Longitudinal Shower Profile  Energy preliminary ~ 4.8 Photons / m / electron (~ 0.5 % of dE/dx) A Stereo Hybrid; q ~70°:  A Stereo Hybrid; q ~70° Coihueco Fluores. Telescope Los Leones Fluores. Telescope ~8·1019eV Lateral Distribution Function ~37 km ~24km ~70° global view A stereo hybrid; q ~70°:  A stereo hybrid; q ~70° ~37 km ~24km A stereo hybrid; q ~70°:  A stereo hybrid; q ~70° Shower Profile ~7·1019eV (SD: ~8·1019eV) The Power of Hybrid Observations:  The Power of Hybrid Observations The Power of Hybrid Observations:  The Power of Hybrid Observations y Slide36:  Some numbers: data taking from Jan. 2004 SD: number of tanks in operation 650 fully efficient above ~ 3.1018 eV number of events ~ 120,000 reconstructed ( > 3fold, >1018 eV) ~ 16,500 at present ~ 600 events/day FD: number of sites in operation 2 SD+FD: number of hybrids 1750 ~ 350 “golden” Slide37:  Preliminary Sky Plot Auger-S >85o Auger-S >60o no energy cut applied Slide38:  Distribution of Nearby Matter Auger-S >60o Auger-N >60o Jim Cronin, astro-ph/0402487 7-21 Mpc Two Candidate Sites:  Two Candidate Sites AUGER NORTH CONCLUSIONS:  CONCLUSIONS Auger construction in rapid progress in south Physics data taking since January 2004 Stable operation, excellent performance Hybrid approach is a great advantage! Neutrino sensitivity First physics results by summer 2005 Energy spectrum Sky map Auger North proposal in progress Slide41:  Pampa Amarilla Hybrid Reconstruction Quality:  Hybrid Reconstruction Quality 68% error bounds given detector is optimized for 1019eV, but good Hybrid reconstruction quality at lower energy statistical errors only zenith angles < 60O High-Energy Neutrinos in Auger:  High-Energy Neutrinos in Auger  ns expected from distant AGN a/o decay of TDs  X-section @ 1020 eV ≈~10-32 cm2 (Earth opaque for En 1015 eV)  detection by horizontal EAS  If nm  nt Oscillations  advantageous for observation of nt induced Showers n Tests of many AGN & TD Models in range AGN TD LDF in Hybrid Events:  LDF in Hybrid Events • good agreement of SD and FD • good agreement of SD and MC LDF for 1018 eV Showers (Energy from FD) Data points scaled from SD < EFD > = 1.21018 eV Slide45:  Neutrino Sensitivities (per site) X. Bertou et. al. Astropart. Phys. 17 (2002) 183 Expected no. per year  Limit (E-2) for 5 years  Sensitivity e and  Sensitivity High DIS None Slide46:  Integrated Sensitivity of Various Experiments Slide47:  High-Energy Neutrinos in Auger  ns expected from distant AGN a/o decay of TDs  X-section @ 1020 eV ≈~10-32 cm2 (Earth opaque for En 1015 eV)  detection by horizontal EAS  If nm  nt Oscillations  advantageous for observation of nt induced Showers n Neutrino Sensitivity (per flavor)

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Rosalie

Class9 Competition
26. 11. 2007
0 views

Class9 Competition

The Texas Revolt
07. 12. 2007
0 views

The Texas Revolt

Ph 6 Logic
16. 11. 2007
0 views

Ph 6 Logic

Quantitative Risk Management
21. 11. 2007
0 views

Quantitative Risk Management

geoff syme
03. 01. 2008
0 views

geoff syme

tolvaptan
04. 01. 2008
0 views

tolvaptan

RS 761 7 FEB 06 COTS
31. 12. 2007
0 views

RS 761 7 FEB 06 COTS

Zoonosis
19. 11. 2007
0 views

Zoonosis

Mertens IRI2007 Prague
06. 11. 2007
0 views

Mertens IRI2007 Prague

Siberianchaga
21. 11. 2007
0 views

Siberianchaga

everywhere
28. 12. 2007
0 views

everywhere

Lecture 33 SPT DEC
19. 02. 2008
0 views

Lecture 33 SPT DEC

A370SocOrg
24. 02. 2008
0 views

A370SocOrg

Double TDDFT Martinez
30. 12. 2007
0 views

Double TDDFT Martinez

gica030924
28. 02. 2008
0 views

gica030924

TomatoesI
04. 03. 2008
0 views

TomatoesI

IMS IDEA Oct 2006
01. 10. 2007
0 views

IMS IDEA Oct 2006

Large Projects 2005 FInal
12. 03. 2008
0 views

Large Projects 2005 FInal

e commerce in 3R
27. 03. 2008
0 views

e commerce in 3R

South Pacific Climate
07. 04. 2008
0 views

South Pacific Climate

All Box Cases
30. 03. 2008
0 views

All Box Cases

ferson
09. 11. 2007
0 views

ferson

Uranus
15. 11. 2007
0 views

Uranus

My Estuaries by Kunal
07. 01. 2008
0 views

My Estuaries by Kunal

scab PAG 12 03
04. 10. 2007
0 views

scab PAG 12 03

Boyer
28. 11. 2007
0 views

Boyer

PMIMegaProjectSuccess
04. 01. 2008
0 views

PMIMegaProjectSuccess

Cushman henderson lbcf
06. 12. 2007
0 views

Cushman henderson lbcf

P07 STax Q Basics Imp
15. 11. 2007
0 views

P07 STax Q Basics Imp