Options Questionnaire 12 11 02

Information about Options Questionnaire 12 11 02

Published on October 29, 2007

Author: Abhil

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Communities Creating LTC Options: County Planning Assessment Questionnaire Status of LTC Program Development as of December 2002 Prepared by the California Center for Long Term Care Integration Presented December 11, 2002:  Communities Creating LTC Options: County Planning Assessment Questionnaire Status of LTC Program Development as of December 2002 Prepared by the California Center for Long Term Care Integration Presented December 11, 2002 Purpose:  Purpose Sharing information across counties including plans and best practices Current status and future directions Baseline for future program evaluation Provide information for waiver planning Provide information for AB-3054 Responding Counties:  Responding Counties 13 Completed: Alameda Contra Costa Los Angeles Monterey Orange Partnership Health Plan of California Yolo Napa San Diego San Francisco San Luis Obispo San Mateo Santa Cruz Two unable to make deadline: Riverside, Nevada Three indicated that they will not complete the questionnaire at this time: Yuba, Sonoma, Marin Completion of Questionnaire:  Completion of Questionnaire Contra Costa, Monterey, Orange, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Cruz were most complete Others completed at least three of the nine questions Planning process and results, Organization, Target populations Planning Process/Organization:  Planning Process/Organization Boards of Supervisors play varying roles Providing funding Steering committee representation Receiving regular reports No involvement at all Health plan involvement Partnership Health Plan is 1040 grantee CalOptima is only active party in Orange All Healthy San Diego (Sharp & Community most) COHS involved with task force and at program level in San Mateo & Santa Cruz /Monterey Most involve health plan on steering committee (LA & San Francisco invited but don’t come) Planning Process/Organization:  Planning Process/Organization 9 in Aging/Adult/Senior department within health &/or human services; 3 in COHS Five use paid consultants Staff & consultant time for LTC planning 5 @ 100%; 2 @ 75%; 1 @ 50%; 5 @ 0-25% Steering committees Range in size from 12 to 400+ Roles vary from policy to working to advisory groups Where committees are large, there are subcommittees doing the follow-through type of work Wide range of time in existence 3 months (Partnership) to 10 years (San Mateo) 3 since 1996-1999; 7 since 2000-2002 Committees evolve over the years as opportunities & challenges change Meeting on a monthly or bi-monthly basis Much work done by subcommittees Mission, Vision, Values:  Mission, Vision, Values All but two counties had developed mission, vision, and values statements Target Populations:  Target Populations LA, Alameda, & Partnership undecided Condition/level of care Aged (either 60+ or 65+) Disabled (18+ or 21+) SF & SLO undecided re: SNF residents, CCC & Monterey include in later phase 6 include HIV/AIDS (rest undecided) CCC, Monterey, San Mateo, SLO, SF, & Orange intend to include MR/DD & MH Eligibility status/program participation All include ABD (18+ or 21+) SSI, duals, MSSP, IHSS 300% FPL in SD & 60% FPL in SLO Medicare MCO (SF, Sta. Cruz, Monterey, SLO undecided) Services – 1040/COHS:  Services – 1040/COHS 1040 counties (incl. San Mateo) and Orange to capitate all state plan & usual waiver services Some (Santa Cruz, San Mateo, Monterey, Contra Costa) exclude dental, ICF-DD, or other non-medical services (legal, I & R, counseling…) Orange, San Diego, San Mateo, and Monterey plan to include Medicare Screening & intake may be retained in county agency or transferred to health plan Services – Non-1040:  Services – Non-1040 SF is only non-1040/COHS to have reached decision. Coordination of HCBS, no change to medical (acute, primary, etc.) In absence of financial analysis, CCC reported coordination of all services Finance:  Finance Unanswered questions on financing across the board How to calculate cost neutrality Estimate additional costs of extended state plan services Estimate costs of additional services to be paid by Medi-Cal Identify funding mechanism best describing this LTCI program Models:  Models Full Continuum Capitation, Mandatory San Mateo Santa Cruz San Diego (along with other options) Orange (no IHSS) Managed FFS Monterey HCBS waiver only San Francisco All fund case management with HCBS waivers &/or grants and other funding Quality Assurance:  Quality Assurance Statement of approach Adapting health plan QA program State standards from contract/waiver Most not there yet Integrated Info Systems:  Integrated Info Systems All plan to have IIS eventually COHS already have (Panorama, Erisco FACET) Network of Care in 13 CA counties Alameda, San Diego, Santa Cruz, Contra Costa, Monterey Info on providers + info for consumers SF GetCare – non-medical – two portals (consumer & provider) – information about HCBS providers & standards protocols Uniform assessment – some will develop, others trying to find/adapt existing one San Mateo will use MDS-HC Vignettes:  Vignettes PHC/Yolo/Napa: Just started in September. Alameda: Suspended pending funding LA: Just completed strategic plan & awaiting BOS approval Orange is not a community process – COHS (CalOptima) pursuing waiver to add more HCBS to package. SLO: Quarter-time consultant, monthly meeting of steering committee (40+ members). Only target population decided. Vignettes:  Vignettes San Diego: Actively pursuing 1040 PLUS other options under BOS mandate. San Mateo: Ready for 1040; awaiting cap rate negotiation and re-stabilization of COHS San Francisco: Pursuing HCBS-oriented waiver process. Santa Cruz/Monterey: Steady progress on COHS-based system. Contra Costa: Awaiting data for full feasibility determination. County Goals for next 6 Months :  County Goals for next 6 Months 11 of 12 counties listed goals for the next 6 months. County goals vary in specificity among counties. Goals range from financial analysis to agreeing on how to proceed with LTCI projects. 3 counties (Alameda, Napa, and San Diego) listed developing an action plan or having consensus on how to proceed with LTCI efforts; what strategies to take. Only one county (San Mateo) listed web-based care management systems as a goal. One county (Orange) listed working with DHS. One county (Los Angeles) listed transportation and housing issues among their goals.

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Abhil

oyster culture
03. 01. 2008
0 views

oyster culture

laser
02. 05. 2008
0 views

laser

electricity project
10. 10. 2007
0 views

electricity project

CAPM Nt
28. 04. 2008
0 views

CAPM Nt

futures
16. 04. 2008
0 views

futures

601presentation
29. 09. 2007
0 views

601presentation

RJ Iris Equity Seminar
03. 10. 2007
0 views

RJ Iris Equity Seminar

bubbles
03. 10. 2007
0 views

bubbles

weather jeopardy spanish
07. 10. 2007
0 views

weather jeopardy spanish

pc03
09. 10. 2007
0 views

pc03

IVACS2006 handout
09. 10. 2007
0 views

IVACS2006 handout

06 collaborating to improve ell
10. 10. 2007
0 views

06 collaborating to improve ell

lj
13. 10. 2007
0 views

lj

4bTheNobelPrizeinChe mistry2004
15. 10. 2007
0 views

4bTheNobelPrizeinChe mistry2004

Lecture 1 Darwin vs God
15. 10. 2007
0 views

Lecture 1 Darwin vs God

NCMA Presentation
22. 10. 2007
0 views

NCMA Presentation

endangeredspecies ppt
12. 10. 2007
0 views

endangeredspecies ppt

mtom
24. 10. 2007
0 views

mtom

scaling
19. 10. 2007
0 views

scaling

p10
23. 10. 2007
0 views

p10

2007 Applicant Demographics
30. 10. 2007
0 views

2007 Applicant Demographics

WNV
21. 10. 2007
0 views

WNV

cells
20. 11. 2007
0 views

cells

conclusiones V1 sep28 2007
25. 10. 2007
0 views

conclusiones V1 sep28 2007

ap Cold War 07
23. 12. 2007
0 views

ap Cold War 07

10 Review
29. 12. 2007
0 views

10 Review

Isle Royale Simulation
01. 01. 2008
0 views

Isle Royale Simulation

structengr
04. 01. 2008
0 views

structengr

2005 02 07 Could Al Qaeda Win
07. 01. 2008
0 views

2005 02 07 Could Al Qaeda Win

td06030
15. 10. 2007
0 views

td06030

I DESC Japan
09. 10. 2007
0 views

I DESC Japan

section5 lec2
13. 11. 2007
0 views

section5 lec2

205w
03. 01. 2008
0 views

205w

Ceiling Fan Sales Training
23. 10. 2007
0 views

Ceiling Fan Sales Training

v war stuntman
19. 02. 2008
0 views

v war stuntman

HIMARS ENGLISHLANGUAGE
04. 03. 2008
0 views

HIMARS ENGLISHLANGUAGE

ING NYC Marathon 2007
12. 03. 2008
0 views

ING NYC Marathon 2007

K ICMCI as an NGO
20. 03. 2008
0 views

K ICMCI as an NGO

CPB750 TXT
03. 04. 2008
0 views

CPB750 TXT

Unit 4 Japan s Geography 1
07. 04. 2008
0 views

Unit 4 Japan s Geography 1

neither shall the sword
27. 02. 2008
0 views

neither shall the sword

solka fml 4 15 06 dj final
15. 11. 2007
0 views

solka fml 4 15 06 dj final

coface07
13. 04. 2008
0 views

coface07

AMurcko
17. 04. 2008
0 views

AMurcko

FACS borenstein Dec03
22. 04. 2008
0 views

FACS borenstein Dec03

mhtb
07. 11. 2007
0 views

mhtb

ç
10. 10. 2007
0 views

ç

Retroviruses105
15. 10. 2007
0 views

Retroviruses105

Krajweski Chapter 15 16
07. 05. 2008
0 views

Krajweski Chapter 15 16

0916 Branch 0730
02. 10. 2007
0 views

0916 Branch 0730

Lec5 3rd
30. 04. 2008
0 views

Lec5 3rd

pp angel cristian
01. 10. 2007
0 views

pp angel cristian

Guy Wormser
23. 10. 2007
0 views

Guy Wormser

From the Inside Looking Out
02. 05. 2008
0 views

From the Inside Looking Out

26 ple edgecock
17. 10. 2007
0 views

26 ple edgecock

rcdt 061127 05
10. 10. 2007
0 views

rcdt 061127 05

CAISModelGreenSchool
07. 03. 2008
0 views

CAISModelGreenSchool

Ordinamento Germania
16. 11. 2007
0 views

Ordinamento Germania

20041005 Adam Posen
09. 10. 2007
0 views

20041005 Adam Posen

A71 Quezada
01. 11. 2007
0 views

A71 Quezada

CAMET Report
22. 10. 2007
0 views

CAMET Report

workbench
08. 10. 2007
0 views

workbench

melderichtlinien
05. 10. 2007
0 views

melderichtlinien

APAN E culturePresentation 1 21
30. 10. 2007
0 views

APAN E culturePresentation 1 21

ANGELImplementationa tLCCC
01. 10. 2007
0 views

ANGELImplementationa tLCCC

cancer nutri
04. 10. 2007
0 views

cancer nutri

SYSTEM 3 presentation
27. 09. 2007
0 views

SYSTEM 3 presentation

Souza parallel 3 1
12. 10. 2007
0 views

Souza parallel 3 1

Memorial 2007
18. 10. 2007
0 views

Memorial 2007

SIEl 2006
24. 10. 2007
0 views

SIEl 2006