Parity01 grames slides

Information about Parity01 grames slides

Published on November 23, 2007

Author: Mee12

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Slide1:  Spin Dance Review Joe Grames JLab Parity Workshop October 26, 2001 Priorities for electron polarimeters Issues facing 1% polarimetry Spin Dance 2000 Results Slide2:  What priorities must Jlab electron beam polarimetry serve? keV - MeV region for sources and/or nuclear parity experiments GeV for parity and nucleon spin structure experiments Future experiments are heading toward 1% absolute polarimetry Eager users (and the broader community!) What are desirable (necessary) features? Large, precisely known analyzing power Designs with reduced sensitivity to known systematics Techniques that do not disturb the experiment (non-invasive) High luminosity to rapidly achieve small statistical uncertainty Slide3:  The JLab Electron Polarimeters Slide4:  Polarimeter analyzing power: Atot Precise knowledge of the analyzing power is limited. Atot is not a directly measured quantity: measurement requires difficult double-scattering experiments the analyzing power is determined by theory and simulation Factors that affect knowledge of the total analyzing power: Mott (Coulomb screening, finite nuclear size, multiple scattering) Compton (energy resolution, radiative background) Moller (detector acceptance, Levchuk effect, target polarization) Slide5:  Jefferson Lab - E. Chudakov, H. Fenker, A. Freyberger, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, J. Mitchell, M. Poelker, C. Sinclair, M. Steigerwald, M. Tiefenback CEA Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/SPHN - C. Cavata, S. Escoffier, F. Marie, T. Pussieux, P. Vernin Florida International University - R. Nasseripour, B. Raue Karkov Institute - V. Gorbenko Massachusetts Institute of Technology - D. Higinbotham, R. Suleiman North Carolina Ag. and Tech. State University - S. Danagoulian Old Dominion University - V. Dharmawardane University of Virginia - R. Fatemi, K. Joo, M. Zeier Universitaet Bonn - T. Reichelt Vrije Universiteit - B. Zihlmann Jefferson Lab Spin Dance 2000 Collaboration Slide6:  Polarized Source & Spin Precession The polarized electron beam is produced by photoemission from a strained GaAs crystal held at a potential of -100 kV using circularly polarized light of the appropriate wavelength. Spin precession accumulates in the transport arcs. At 6 GeV the total precession exceeds 10,000 deg. Slide7:  Why call it a “spin dance” ? . Pmeas sin( hWien + f ) Measuring the beam polarization at various Wien angles determines both the spin polarization and direction. To offset the spin precession in the accelerator we use a Wien filter near the electron gun to set (hWien) the beam polarization direction. Slide8:  Source Strained GaAs photocathode (l = 850 nm, Pb >75 %) Accelerator 5.7 GeV, 5 pass recirculation Spin Dance 2000 Experiment Slide9:  Relative Analying Power Results Pmeas sin(hWien + f) Slide10:  Uncertainties are based on statistics and do not include any systematics. Polarimeters of 3 types (Mott, Moller, Compton) indicate agreement. Relative Analyzing Powers Compared Pmeas normalized to Mott for reference Slide11:  Spin Based Energy Measurements Why consider measuring the beam energy by spin precession when precise (~10-4) alternative methods exist and are quick (1-2 hours)? Answer 1: large cummulative spin precession (10,000 degrees) between the injector and end-stations yields  10-4 to 10-5 relative uncertainty and is sensitive to accelerator setup (injector energy, linac gradients, bend angles). Answer 2: small precession (500 degrees) between end-stations at final beam energy yields  ~10-3 relative uncertainty but requires only knowledge of end-station bend angles. This information comes essentially free at the cost necessary to intercompare the electron polarimeters. It provides two independent methods which can be used for cross-calibration and are sensitive to the accelerator where the others are not. Slide12:  Energy Results Summarized Slide13:  35 MeV Shift DY = -2.9° or DQ = -0.22° Slide14:  Polarimeters often disagree at a level larger than quoted systematics, particularly beyond the level hoped for by users. A spin dance experiment aims to intercompare polarimeter analyzing powers by using a common test beam to improve polarimeter systematics. Spin Dance 2000 indicates agreement of independent polarimeter techniques (Mott, Moller, Compton), but also demonstrates systematic differences. Spin based energy measurements at Jlab are high precisision, are sensitive to accelerator parameters, and are a by-product of the polarimeter comparison. Often, the polarimeter is simply viewed as the tool. To reach the 1% absolute mark the polarimeter must be the experiment, not the tool. Conclusions

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Mee12

08 Dog and Cat Nutrition
16. 11. 2007
0 views

08 Dog and Cat Nutrition

miguel angel bustamante
01. 10. 2007
0 views

miguel angel bustamante

Athens 2004
02. 10. 2007
0 views

Athens 2004

hauer1
27. 09. 2007
0 views

hauer1

aws
06. 11. 2007
0 views

aws

Chapters 9 10
26. 11. 2007
0 views

Chapters 9 10

ContinuousIntegration final
28. 11. 2007
0 views

ContinuousIntegration final

N A V I G T O R S VBB 2007
30. 11. 2007
0 views

N A V I G T O R S VBB 2007

Fruit Insects
01. 12. 2007
0 views

Fruit Insects

raghavachari
04. 12. 2007
0 views

raghavachari

Test Anxiety 1
06. 12. 2007
0 views

Test Anxiety 1

ProvidentialHistory
31. 10. 2007
0 views

ProvidentialHistory

chap08 og
01. 11. 2007
0 views

chap08 og

handout 184637
05. 11. 2007
0 views

handout 184637

2004 harm present
05. 11. 2007
0 views

2004 harm present

E DESC AK PACOM POL CONF ver31
13. 11. 2007
0 views

E DESC AK PACOM POL CONF ver31

bedeutung innovation
15. 11. 2007
0 views

bedeutung innovation

GA Conf07Lomas
13. 12. 2007
0 views

GA Conf07Lomas

CooperativeLearning
17. 12. 2007
0 views

CooperativeLearning

Friendship 1
23. 12. 2007
0 views

Friendship 1

plant lifecycles
28. 12. 2007
0 views

plant lifecycles

Millay
28. 12. 2007
0 views

Millay

alterman pki 05 13 01
01. 01. 2008
0 views

alterman pki 05 13 01

RMA 2005
02. 01. 2008
0 views

RMA 2005

OH
04. 01. 2008
0 views

OH

pp Bioeconomy Polansky Dec2007
04. 01. 2008
0 views

pp Bioeconomy Polansky Dec2007

nazca lines
07. 01. 2008
0 views

nazca lines

4330IBS
30. 10. 2007
0 views

4330IBS

Wk4 Mon
04. 01. 2008
0 views

Wk4 Mon

lh1
21. 11. 2007
0 views

lh1

econ and mgnt of privatization
20. 11. 2007
0 views

econ and mgnt of privatization

jre imps2005
06. 11. 2007
0 views

jre imps2005

EE541 451 class29
28. 11. 2007
0 views

EE541 451 class29

Aquatic Equipment
08. 11. 2007
0 views

Aquatic Equipment

WomensEmploymentJan2 001
24. 02. 2008
0 views

WomensEmploymentJan2 001

1025 QM05 Nardi
29. 10. 2007
0 views

1025 QM05 Nardi

wendybear
24. 12. 2007
0 views

wendybear

Martinac
14. 03. 2008
0 views

Martinac

DynaMed
25. 10. 2007
0 views

DynaMed

IntStu
27. 03. 2008
0 views

IntStu

Country Risk Sep07
13. 04. 2008
0 views

Country Risk Sep07

Eco 336 Constitutional Limits on
17. 12. 2007
0 views

Eco 336 Constitutional Limits on

2003 lecture crypto1
31. 12. 2007
0 views

2003 lecture crypto1

robo lectures
14. 11. 2007
0 views

robo lectures

Ders1
29. 12. 2007
0 views

Ders1

REDLOBSTER
07. 12. 2007
0 views

REDLOBSTER

WarmUps WHII
25. 12. 2007
0 views

WarmUps WHII

pres riccardo
30. 10. 2007
0 views

pres riccardo

Chapt3overhead
12. 11. 2007
0 views

Chapt3overhead

SHFA280301
28. 11. 2007
0 views

SHFA280301

IfA jan03v1
15. 11. 2007
0 views

IfA jan03v1