Rauktis

Information about Rauktis

Published on January 11, 2008

Author: Patrizia

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Treatment Foster Care and Therapeutic Alliance: the nature of relationships between treatment parents and youth :  Treatment Foster Care and Therapeutic Alliance: the nature of relationships between treatment parents and youth Mary Beth Rauktis, Ph.D. Shauna Reinhart, M. P. A. Lucy McDonough, M.Ed Ann Doucette, Ph.D. Ana Regina Andrade, Ph.D. CHARPP September 26-27, 2005 Pressley Ridge Mission:  Pressley Ridge Mission To improve the adjustment & achievement of young people with troubling behaviors and their families through effective programs that focus on all aspects of their lives. To lead in the development of innovative programming, evaluating those programs, measuring their outcomes, and conducting research. To champion initiatives that impact the system of care for young people and their families. Pressley Ridge Values :  Pressley Ridge Values Idealism is imperative Relationships are paramount Joy in our work is essential Re-ED is our foundation We strive for quality-nothing less than our best We are all teachers and we are all learners Where we are...:  Where we are... Delaware Kentucky Maryland Ohio Pennsylvania Virginia Washington, D.C. West Virginia International Presence Hungary Portugal & Brazil Ukraine What is Therapeutic Alliance?:  What is Therapeutic Alliance? Working relationship between youth and treatment parent that is based on: Perception of an emotional bond Agreement on goals of treatment Agreement on tasks to reach goals Perception of openness & truthfulness of the relationship (Doucette & Bickman, 2001) Why Study Alliance?:  Why Study Alliance? All psychotherapy occurs within an interpersonal relationship. Alliance seen as critical in many orientations. Among adults, alliance is a consistent predictor of engagement and outcome (Horvath & Symonds, 1991; Martin et al., 2000). Evidence is limited among children, but practicing clinicians and treatment researchers alike report alliance is important (Brent & Kolko, 1998; Kazdin et al., 1990; Shirk & Saiz, 1992). Treatment Foster Care:  Treatment Foster Care Therapeutic Foster Care (TFC) is considered to be one of the few community-based, comprehensive interventions that is viewed as “evidence-based” Tremendous enthusiasm across the country “Evidence” comes almost exclusively from Patti Chamberlain’s work at Oregon Social Learning Center Little known about TFC in ‘real world’ settings (Farmer, FFTA, 7.21.2005) Complexities of Therapeutic Alliance and Treatment Foster Care:  Complexities of Therapeutic Alliance and Treatment Foster Care Youth rarely enter into foster care voluntarily They are in a state of change (physical, cognitive and neurological) Developmental stage may be at odds with establishing relationships with adults Youth may have experienced life situations e.g. maltreatment, that may negatively impact their ability to form alliances (Doucette et al., 2003; Eltz, Shirk & Sarlin, 1995) Treatment Foster Care is a “nested” intervention within larger systems (Pecora et. al 1995; James & Meezan, 2002) Is There Need for Research on Alliance in the “Brave New World” of Evidence Based Treatment?:  Is There Need for Research on Alliance in the “Brave New World” of Evidence Based Treatment? “Research to Practice” problem may be due to an incomplete understanding of how client and professional characteristics affect the therapeutic process Kazdin and Nock (2003) propose that extending therapeutic models developed from clinical trials to clinical settings without understanding the mechanisms of how treatment works is a key factor limiting transferability. A better understanding of therapeutic “Common Factors” is needed (Bickman, 1999)- what is common across all therapeutic approaches? Is There Need for Research on Alliance in the “Brave New World” of Evidence Based Treatment?:  Is There Need for Research on Alliance in the “Brave New World” of Evidence Based Treatment? Dropping out of mental health services is a major impediment to effective treatment for youth, adolescents and their families It is estimated that among families who begin treatment, 40% to 60% will terminate prematurely (Kazdin, 1996; Wierzbicki & Pekarik, 1993). Early termination has been associated with poorer outcomes (Prinz & Miller, 1994) and contributes to the high societal costs when mental health needs remain unmet (U.S. DHHS, 1999). In our own program, we experience “disrupted” placements in approximately 25% of our discharges. Is There Need for Research on Alliance in the “Brave New World” of Evidence Based Treatment?:  Is There Need for Research on Alliance in the “Brave New World” of Evidence Based Treatment? There is little research on how the parent-youth relationship impacts treatment Farmer et al. (2003) in their study of Treatment Foster Care in North Carolina found that parent-child relationship was significantly related to positive youth outcomes Guiding Questions:  Guiding Questions Do youth and treatment parents have similar perceptions about the relationship? Does the perception of the relationship change over time? What is the association between alliance and resistance? Is alliance associated with youth and treatment parent characteristics? Methods and Design:  Methods and Design Descriptive study Profiling relationships Repeated measures design Dyads (TP-youth) (TP-TC) Pressley Ridge Treatment Foster Care program in Delaware New program Implemented in response to a system of care in Delaware 40 hour Pre-service curriculum for treatment parents Treatment parents supervised in the home by a professional on a weekly basis Limited number of foster youth in the home (2 or less) Slide14:  Pressley Ridge Therapeutic Alliance Scales Therapeutic Alliance Questionnaire is a 30 item 3 point scale Brief form is 18 items 3 point scale English and Spanish versions Two subscales: Mutuality and perception of a collaborative relationship Resistance/unfavorable outlook on treatment Youth Demographics & Descriptive Information (N=25):  Youth Demographics & Descriptive Information (N=25) Primary Treatment Parent Demographics:  Primary Treatment Parent Demographics Do youth and treatment parents have different perceptions about their relationship?:  Do youth and treatment parents have different perceptions about their relationship? YES, their perceptions are different. Most youth and treatment parents alliance ratings show a favorable relationship (majority of bars are above neutral alliance). Treatment parents alliance ratings are higher than youth ratings. Treatment parents believe their relationship with the youth is better than what the youth reports (t-test p=0.03). Youth alliance changes over time “Honey moon” pattern –higher alliance followed by lower and then increasing alliance. Youth Alliance: Modeled Ratings Time Trajectories:  Youth Alliance: Modeled Ratings Time Trajectories Red=unstable; Blue=high & stable; Green=improving N=288 :Lack the power to determine statistical differences Individual Curves—decreasing then increasing:  Individual Curves—decreasing then increasing History of placement in RTC and foster care History of sexual abuse Moved to second home due to Treatment parent deciding to fostering her grandchildren Individual Curves—decreasing then increasing:  Individual Curves—decreasing then increasing Referred through Juvenile Justice History of running from foster homes No biological family involvement No placement changes Youth Alliance: biological children in treatment home:  Youth Alliance: biological children in treatment home Presence of biological children at home does not seem to prevent youth and treatment parent from building good relationships. Over time parents with biological children living at home get higher ratings that parents without biological children (less variation) Youth Alliance by treatment parent & youth race:  Youth Alliance by treatment parent & youth race Caucasian youth placed with African American parents or Hispanic and vise/versa reported neutral to favorable alliance. But the pattern is more variable & has a tendency to deteriorate over time. Youth Alliance: youth gender:  Youth Alliance: youth gender There is not much of gender differential in youth TA ratings—males slightly flatter slope Youth Alliance: youth age:  Youth Alliance: youth age Little age differential Youth Alliance: previous placements:  Youth Alliance: previous placements Youth with three or less prior placements have higher alliance scores & a flatter curve Youth Alliance: diagnosis:  Youth Alliance: diagnosis For youth with ODD, the alliance curve is “U” shaped, showing decreasing alliance then increasing Youth Alliance: problems & behavior:  Youth Alliance: problems & behavior Youth with high internalizing and externalizing behaviors have decreasing then increasing alliance Youth Alliance: resistance:  Youth Alliance: resistance High youth resistance associates with low alliance and a steep slope Low youth resistance associates with higher alliance and more stable alliance Limitations:  Limitations Descriptive and preliminary Small N (only 25 youth but multiple time points) One program—could be something different about the parents, youth or the program Measure of alliance adapted from an earlier measure used in a partial program education setting Not able to obtain TA scores on all youth from the day when they first entered the treatment home Summary:  Summary Overall, both youths and treatment parents report favorable alliance. Treatment Parents are more positive about the relationship than the youths. “Honey moon” pattern –higher alliance followed by lower and then increasing alliance. There appear to be different trajectories of alliance growth over time. Summary:  Summary The presence of biological children and treatment parent race influenced the development of youth alliance. Youth diagnosis, resistance, degree of problem severity and the number of prior placements influenced the development of youth alliance Implications:  Implications Policy: closely monitor & limit changes in placement. Training & Supervision: mentoring, supporting and training parents e.g. “inoculating” them for when the honeymoon period ends. supporting parents and training them to effectively deal with reactive and resistant behavior. helping treatment parents to understand that for some youth, it may take a longer time to develop a relationship. helping parents understand the role of culture and race in cross-racial placements. Implications:  Implications Clinical Pre-planned contingencies and individualized planning before crisis. Matching youth (highly resistant, ODD, many placements) with experienced treatment parents & providing close supervision. (Typically, new parents are paired with new youth --“rookie factor”) Pre-planned respite Further Research:  Further Research Random assignment of “low alliance/high resistance” profile youth to homes, then addition of increased support and respite. Compare with the non-enhanced homes on: transfers, discharge, satisfaction and parent stress Study of outcomes and alliance Does feedback to parents change the course of alliance? Does feedback help the supervision process? Contact Information :  Contact Information [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Patrizia

08 Paez Liliana
09. 01. 2008
0 views

08 Paez Liliana

Chapter 03 final
14. 01. 2008
0 views

Chapter 03 final

edu206bnewppt
14. 01. 2008
0 views

edu206bnewppt

trt 10
15. 01. 2008
0 views

trt 10

Zurich
15. 01. 2008
0 views

Zurich

foundation
16. 01. 2008
0 views

foundation

qad2
16. 01. 2008
0 views

qad2

38TexSec7Consulations
16. 01. 2008
0 views

38TexSec7Consulations

uwi caricom collaboration
18. 01. 2008
0 views

uwi caricom collaboration

LAO Overview 2005 Presentation
21. 01. 2008
0 views

LAO Overview 2005 Presentation

combined presentation
23. 01. 2008
0 views

combined presentation

Bus Rapid Transit
04. 02. 2008
0 views

Bus Rapid Transit

Ancient Greece Powerpoint
11. 02. 2008
0 views

Ancient Greece Powerpoint

12 Legumes
22. 01. 2008
0 views

12 Legumes

FatigueFactors
25. 01. 2008
0 views

FatigueFactors

Troy
07. 02. 2008
0 views

Troy

MesopotamiaandEgypt 000
13. 02. 2008
0 views

MesopotamiaandEgypt 000

Pulwarty
18. 01. 2008
0 views

Pulwarty

bo20605
22. 02. 2008
0 views

bo20605

22nov05 3 02 Pangalos
25. 02. 2008
0 views

22nov05 3 02 Pangalos

DoubleTreeShow
27. 02. 2008
0 views

DoubleTreeShow

chicken pox story
28. 02. 2008
0 views

chicken pox story

HRToptions
29. 02. 2008
0 views

HRToptions

Personnel Management
16. 03. 2008
0 views

Personnel Management

WorldQuest 2007 with answers
13. 01. 2008
0 views

WorldQuest 2007 with answers

2007 4300S1 05
25. 03. 2008
0 views

2007 4300S1 05

econ153 lecture4
11. 03. 2008
0 views

econ153 lecture4

redding slides
16. 04. 2008
0 views

redding slides

y200832411557
17. 04. 2008
0 views

y200832411557

Maynard QI Reliability
18. 04. 2008
0 views

Maynard QI Reliability

0RegansLegacy
21. 04. 2008
0 views

0RegansLegacy

StorySegmentation 05312006
22. 04. 2008
0 views

StorySegmentation 05312006

Book2 Unit5
16. 04. 2008
0 views

Book2 Unit5

Historical Background
24. 04. 2008
0 views

Historical Background

First Day 317B
14. 01. 2008
0 views

First Day 317B

CHEA Nielson GATS Higher Ed
08. 05. 2008
0 views

CHEA Nielson GATS Higher Ed

2006CitizenSurvey
14. 03. 2008
0 views

2006CitizenSurvey

Tribes presentation
30. 04. 2008
0 views

Tribes presentation

math isat
02. 05. 2008
0 views

math isat

oz
02. 05. 2008
0 views

oz

coloring book generic
05. 02. 2008
0 views

coloring book generic

iaa about us ergo 2007
05. 03. 2008
0 views

iaa about us ergo 2007

HST353 16
23. 01. 2008
0 views

HST353 16

THE OVERLAP
29. 01. 2008
0 views

THE OVERLAP

egr470
05. 03. 2008
0 views

egr470

ramel2007a
03. 03. 2008
0 views

ramel2007a

abadi fcs arspa floc06
31. 01. 2008
0 views

abadi fcs arspa floc06

TRB 2005 McMillan
21. 03. 2008
0 views

TRB 2005 McMillan

Le ST5 KuaFu Symposium 2007 01
17. 01. 2008
0 views

Le ST5 KuaFu Symposium 2007 01

Student Outreach Presentation
20. 03. 2008
0 views

Student Outreach Presentation

session 17 zalk barrierbanding
07. 03. 2008
0 views

session 17 zalk barrierbanding