Ray Flores Roadmap

Information about Ray Flores Roadmap

Published on March 4, 2008

Author: Breezy

Source: authorstream.com

Content

USAF T&E DAYS TRANSFORMING THE T&E ENTERPRISE VISION FOR T&E PANEL 7 December 2005 :  Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force USAF T&E DAYS TRANSFORMING THE T&E ENTERPRISE VISION FOR T&E PANEL 7 December 2005 Slide2:  T&E ENTERPRISE VISION Goals - Develop and Enable our People Operate Quality Installations Align the T&E Enterprise Identify, Develop and Transition New Test Capabilities Support Development, Fielding & Sustainment Change Strategy Document, streamline, and manage T&E test and business processes Institute T&E expeditionary mindset over weapon system life cycle Enable Integrated Test Teams with independent verification capability Develop Enterprise prioritization traceable to requirements Institutionalize feedback on T&E processes Vision Credible T&E Enterprise delivering quality information for risk management to our customers and stakeholders through clear lines of responsibility and accountability End State Effective T&E capabilities in place to enable delivery of decisive, integrated combat systems Integrated AF T&E Enterprise “To-Be” Independent AFMC Stovepipes Collaborative AF Centers/Wings Case for Action FY03 NDAA, DTRMC Budget Constraints Lack of credibility among all stakeholders Complexity and diversity of emerging weapon systems Need for system of systems testing and seamless verification Change Plan First Align the Enterprise Develop an integrated roadmap Define meaningful Balanced Scorecard measures Second Enable test & training in a joint environment Develop and resource an effective enterprise Build integrated DT/OT processes “As-Is” “Was” Objectives Develop and provide expertise to satisfy our customers Deliver properly sized and well maintained infrastructure Use modern business practices to integrate the Enterprise Implement capabilities to support new technologies and system-of-systems testing Increase T&E effectiveness to reduce acquisition program cycle-time, risk and life-cycle cost Many Minds, Many Capabilities . . . Single AF T&E Enterprise Mission The Air Force T&E Enterprise Delivers Effective Test and Evaluation Capabilities (People, Facilities, Processes & Equipment) to Support the Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation of Decisive Warfighting Capability Roadmap Development Teams:  Roadmap Development Teams Exec Leader Team Roadmap Development Teams:  Roadmap Development Teams Planning Team Exec Leader Team Roadmap Development Teams:  Roadmap Development Teams Planning Team Exec Leader Team Execution Team Challenge Summary:  Challenge Summary Funding is Insufficient to Meet Current Requirements Funding Does Not Allow for Preparing for Future Requirements Need to Work With AF to Either Grow the Funding “pie” or Reduce the Requirements “pie” AF T&E Roadmap provides a process for communicating impacts of decisions Roadmap Objectives:  Roadmap Objectives Define AF T&E Requirements and Capabilities to Effectively and Efficiently Meet Current and Future Warfighter Requirements Articulate an Envisioned End State and Goals and Objectives to Meet that Defined End State Establish a Deliberate Process for Prioritizing Resources – Across the AF T&E Enterprise Define a Strategy for Balancing Workload With Resources in The POM to Enable Execution of Roadmap The Roadmap Process:  The Roadmap Process Common Range Inst Air Combat Sea Combat Land Combat C4ISR Armaments/Munitions Test Environments Electronic Combat Space Combat Targets Derive T&E Needs Evaluate T&E Capabilities Capability Exists and Is Needed Capability Exists and not Needed Capability Does Not Exist and is Needed T&E Reliance Areas & Plans Provide & Sustain Capabilities Develop/Restore/ Improve/Modernize Capabilities & Techniques Excess Dispose Divest Requirements Sources CRRA CONOPS Mothball Roadmap Description:  Roadmap Description Living Document Top-level document framing big picture Fully integrated (USAF infrastructure and process requirements) Updated annually (must use a repeatable process) Used to manage funds (POM build, advocate funding, execution planning) Identifies Future Challenges and Critical Enabling Areas Rolls Up to Provide Inputs to DTRMC Strategic Planning WG Rolls Up to Provide Inputs to AF Roadmaps Roadmap Spiral Development:  Roadmap Spiral Development Spiral 1 Influence FY07 APOM Assess Sustainment of Current Capability Focused on Infrastructure Spiral 2 Impact FY08 POM Air Force T&E Roadmap Document Includes AFMC and AFOTEC Emphasis on Capabilities vice Infrastructure Spiral 3 Supports FY09 APOM Continue Maturity; Includes CAF & MAF Spiral 4 Supports FY10 POM; Incorporates All AF T&E Requirements Spiral 5 Institutionalize Process; Annual Updates AF T&E Roadmap Schedule:  AF T&E Roadmap Schedule As Of: 7 Dec 05 Spiral 3 Working Group Kick-off Draft I of Spiral I Release I of Spiral I Spiral 1 Final Release of Spiral I Working Group Kick-off Draft I of Spiral II Release I of Spiral II Final Release of Spiral II Program Concept Dev WG Body/Append Build Spiral 2 ELT On-Sites GO Briefs Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Jan 2005 2006 T&E Days 2007 2008 2009 2010 Spiral 4 Spiral 5 FY09 APOM FY10 POM & SPACE Institutional Process Spiral 2 Direction Roadmap Initiatives:  Spiral 2 Direction Roadmap Initiatives Maintain and Improve Required Capability 1.1 Integrate Systems of Systems Testing 1.2 New System Technologies 1.3 New Test Methodologies 1.4 Modern Business Practices 1.5 Test Support Transformational Support Warfighter Support Weapons Sys Perf & Survivability Weapons Effects Directed Energy High Speed & Hypersonics Network Centric Warfare Test Fleet Support Test Processes Business Processes POM 08 Capability Gaps ADVOCACY INV INITIATIVES WARFIGHTER FOCUS GAP ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS TRANSFORMATIONAL ENABLERS Roadmap Development Teams:  Roadmap Development Teams Execution Team 1.1 Maintaining and Improving Current Capability:  1.1 Maintaining and Improving Current Capability REQUIREMENT Spiral 1 Develop a Quantitative & Qualitative method to manage potential FY07 APOM budget cuts Create Data Tools for the Enterprise to understand - facility utilizations customer requirements DBA $ required to support each test capability capacity (pay, non-pay) Spiral 2 Develop a method that ties the T&E enterprise capabilities (REUs) to national program priorities (CRRA) Provide a diagrammed method to maintain, improve, or divest of all the various test capabilities across the enterprise 1.1 Maintaining and Improving Current Capability:  EXISTING CAPABILITY Ground Test Wind Tunnels RF/EO Chambers Space Environment Chambers Environmental Facilities Etc. Flight Test F-16, F-15, etc. AAMRAM, Small Diameter Bomb Weapon to Platform Integration/Separation Testing Etc. Modeling and Simulation Threat Simulation Aerodynamic Models Etc. 1.1 Maintaining and Improving Current Capability 1.1 Maintaining and Improving Current Capability:  CAPABILITY GAP Weapons Systems Performance and Survivability (WSPS) Weapons Effects (WE) Directed Energy (DE) High Speed & Hypersonics (HS&H) Network Centric Warfare (NCW) Test Fleet Support (TFS) GAP SOLUTION WSPS & WE have test capability, but new technologies needed DE a relatively new area needing significant T&E support HS&H basis for many future weapon systems NCW – taking advantage of the latest computer & information technology Test Fleet Support – Aging Aircraft 1.1 Maintaining and Improving Current Capability Roadmap Development Teams:  Roadmap Development Teams Execution Team 1.2 Systems of Systems:  1.2 Systems of Systems REQUIREMENT Test weapons systems in realistic environments Increasingly, this means with joint and coalition forces Address how well SUT performs as it interoperates with weapons systems and operators Weapon system integration, weapon system to weapon system, and integration into the C2 system Systems of systems testing will require live, virtual, constructive (LVC) entities operating at multiple, geographically separate locations: a distributed environment 1.2 Systems of Systems:  1.2 Systems of Systems EXISTING CAPABILITY Numerous distributed training capabilities and some test sites DMOC (Kirtland) Virtual Warfare Center (St. Louis) CEIF (Hanscom) TDR (Gunter) CAOC-X (Langley) CAOC-N (Nellis) JRAAC (Huntsville) Datalink Test Facility (Eglin) Multi-Service Distributed Event OSD is championing effort to build distributed environment Testing in a Joint Force Environment Roadmap – Nov 2004 Testing in a Joint Force Environment Implementation Plan – Fall 2005 Joint Test & Evaluation Methodology (JTEM) Joint Test will define best practices 1.2 Systems of Systems:  1.2 Systems of Systems CAPABILITY GAP A persistent robust networking infrastructure to connect distributed LVC resources Systems engineering, DT&E, OT&E Strategic partnerships between DOT&E, AT&L and Air Force T&E communities with OUSD(P&R), JFCOM, Air Force MAJCOMs, Instrumentation Lack of AF OPR for distributed test GAP SOLUTION Conduct a comprehensive study of systems of systems test infrastructure requirements Follow approach employed by the DETEC Tri-Service Study Roadmap Development Teams:  Roadmap Development Teams Execution Team 1.3 New Systems Technology:  1.3 New Systems Technology REQUIREMENT: T&E needs for Air Force CONOPS Capabilities beyond current ground and flight test capabilities for New System Technology Directed Energy Weapons High Speed/Hypersonic Systems Large Foot Print Weapons Early and persistent involvement of AF T&E Provide right test capabilities on time and cost Robust system level testing through System Design and Development Phase Effective Early Operational Testing through understanding capabilities and effects 1.3 New Systems Technology:  1.3 New Systems Technology EXISTING CAPABILITIES: Directed Energy Weapons capabilities are limited with regard to power levels affecting all aspects of T&E for new systems, e.g. Survivable instrumentation Threat emulators and simulators Modeling and simulation validation for T&E High Speed/Hypersonics test capabilities are limited and do not represent true physics, e.g. Limited propulsion test capability run time at higher Mach numbers Mach Number range inadequate for propulsion Limited run-time for aerothermodynamic material assessment Modeling and simulation validation for T&E Large Foot Print Weapons require larger range 1.3 New Systems Technology:  1.3 New Systems Technology CAPABILITY GAPS: Existing test capabilities cannot meet the needs for new system technology without significant investment. A few examples are: Ground Test Cannot adequately simulate operating environment for high speed/hypersonic systems Instrumentation systems for Directed Energy Weapons Integration of Modeling and Simulation Flight Test Large footprint weapons range requirements Directed Energy weapons range requirements need to be addressed Communication, telemetry and data acquisition systems band width and range GAP SOLUTIONS: Complete an analysis of alternatives including risk management strategies for test capabilities (people, processes, and resources) for new systems Roadmap Development Teams:  Roadmap Development Teams Execution Team 1.4 New Test Methodologies:  1.4 New Test Methodologies REQUIREMENT Test Environment must be relevant to Warfighter Operations Weapons Systems are increasingly complex Weapons Systems are being designed, developed and deployed in an integrated operational environment Mobility Integrated Live-Virtual-Constructive test methods Seamless Information Transfer and Access Knowledge Management Integrated Test Teams Methods for determination of what to keep and what to divest 1.4 New Test Methodologies:  EXISTING CAPABILITIES & GAPS Several Fixed ‘distributed’ Test Sites AEDC AFFTC AAC (46TW) Limited L-V-C Integration Limited Information Portability Limited Test Team Integration Limited Mobility Limited Investment/Retention/Divestiture Capabilities 1.4 New Test Methodologies 1.4 New Test Methodologies:  GAP SOLUTIONS (Initiatives) Integration of Test Capabilities, where practical L-V-C Integration Integrated DT/OT/OPS Knowledge/Information Sharing Integrated Test Teams (ITT) (ACQ) Expeditionary Test Teams (OPS) Validated/Aligned/Managed Test Tools Design of Experiments Data Management – Knowledge Retention & … Vision Driven Capabilities Planning (Investment, Retention & Divestiture) 1.4 New Test Methodologies Roadmap Development Teams:  Roadmap Development Teams Execution Team Modern Business Practices “As-Is”:  Modern Business Practices “As-Is” “Enterprise” Consists of 3 Test Organizations Plus HQ/AFMC A3 Each Test Organization Has Separate: Financial/Management Processes Level of Detail/Type of Information varies Financial/Management Reporting Systems Capability to Respond to Ad Hoc Questions/Timeliness of Response Varies Definitions for the Same Thing Difficulties in Communication HQ AFMC/A3 has Limited Insight and Knowledge Into Requirements and Actual Utilization Modern Business Practices “To-Be” – By 2011:  Modern Business Practices “To-Be” – By 2011 Common Processes Document Work Account for Requirements and Resources Track Utilization Report Performance Common Software Tools Common Definitions Everyone Speaks the Same Language Enable Activity Based Costing/Management and Capacity Management National Defense Authorization Act of FY03 Drives the Requirement Modern Business Practices Near-Term Activities:  Modern Business Practices Near-Term Activities Feasibility Study 4 Month Study by Outside Contractor Ability for T&E to Reach 2011 Goal ID Risks/Costs/Schedules Recommend a Resource Mix and Management Structure for Successful Completion Mature the Resource Earning Unit (REU) Concept Complete the Designed Operational Capability (DOC) like Statements for T&E Define the Status of Resources and Training Systems (SORTS) like Reporting Process for T&E Conduct Independent Manpower Studies to Document the Resource Requirements Modern Business Practices Longer-Term Activities:  Modern Business Practices Longer-Term Activities Establish a Dedicated Enterprise Team Fully Vet the Requirements Review the Study Plan the Action Manage the Implementation Responsible to the Entire Enterprise Senior Leadership for Implementation Spiral 2 Direction Roadmap Initiatives:  Spiral 2 Direction Roadmap Initiatives Maintain and Improve Required Capability 1.1 Integrate Systems of Systems Testing 1.2 New System Technologies 1.3 New Test Methodologies 1.4 Modern Business Practices 1.5 Test Support Transformational Support Warfighter Support Weapons Sys Perf & Survivability Weapons Effects Directed Energy High Speed & Hypersonics Network Centric Warfare Test Fleet Support Test Processes Business Processes POM 08 Capability Gaps ADVOCACY INV INITIATIVES WARFIGHTER FOCUS GAP ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS TRANSFORMATIONAL ENABLERS AF T&E Roadmap Document:  AF T&E Roadmap Document Executive Summary Introduction Vision, Mission, Goals, and Objectives T&E Capability Drivers T&E Capability Gaps Solution Strategy Future Strategic Planning Activities Summary/Recommendations Spiral 2 Direction Transformational Initiatives:  Spiral 2 Direction Transformational Initiatives Test Processes Knowledge Management (DT- OT Data Collection) Expeditionary Test Teams T&E CONOPS for M&S Design of Experiments Vision Driven Planning Business Processes Slide37:  Test Processes & Knowledge Management Capability Objective Vision Driven Planning Expeditionary Test teams Integrated DT/OT Knowledge/ Information Sharing Validated/Aligned/Managed M&S Tools Knowledge Management/ Communities of Interest Design of Experiments Benefit Decreased Cost & Cycle Time Decreased Rework Increased Confidence in T&E Enterprise by Customers Independent Government Evaluation Spiral 2 Direction Enabling Initiatives:  Spiral 2 Direction Enabling Initiatives Weapons Systems Performance & Survivability Weapons Effects Directed Energy Network Centric Warfare High Speed/ Hypersonic Test Support Fleet Slide39:  Capability Objective Operationally Representative Environment to Conduct NCW T&E Adequate Integration, Instrumentation & Data Acquisition Adequate Technical Expertise Benefit Sufficient Support of NCW Operational Development Reduced Risk (equip, cost, program, …) Training Capabilities for NCW Tactics Development & Operational Capabilities Network Centric Warfare Validation Study Requirements Seed $$ FY06-07 T&E Unconstrained Investment Support Requirement:  T&E Unconstrained Investment Support Requirement Initiative Funding Summary:  Initiative Funding Summary 08 POM Initiative Funding Summary:  08 POM Initiative Funding Summary High Speed Hypersonics Requirements Removed Q&A Morning BREAK Panel Continues…:  Q&A Morning BREAK Panel Continues… RDT&E Effectiveness:  Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force Dr. Ed Kraft AEDC/CA December 7, 2005 RDT&E Effectiveness Efficiency vs Effectiveness:  Efficiency vs Effectiveness Contractor System T&E Cost (Average $795.6M in FY 2001 $)* *Fox et al “Test and Evaluation Costs for Aircraft and Guided Weapons” Rand Project Air Force Report., 2004 + GAO-05-301, Assessment of Selected Major Weapon Programs, March 2005 GAO Program Reviews+ RDT&E Value Hierarchy What you see depends on where you sit :  RDT&E Value Hierarchy What you see depends on where you sit I II III IV V PLAN INSTALL TEST REMOVE SHIP Wind Tunnel Facility Test Program DESIGN BUILD TEST ANALYZE REPORT Wind Tunnel Test Program Air Vehicle Development Program Loads Prop Int Stores Perf S&C Wind Tunnel Flight CR TD SD&D P&D O&S A B C IOC FOC Acquisition Program C4ISR Avionics Stores Propulsion Airframe System Integration Focus Acquisition Cycle Platform Integration Subsystem Development Functional Discipline Test Facility Process Aeronautical RDT&E MOPs, MOEs:  Aeronautical RDT&E MOPs, MOEs Level Measures of Performance Measures of Effectiveness V IV III II I Required capability delivered within cost and schedule Weapon systemMOPs/ MOEs met or exceeded Subsystem integration issues eliminated before 1st flight Pass IOT&E on first attempt Interoperability issues resolved before IOT&E Elimination of subsystem defects before 1st flight Elimination of subsystem integration issues before 1st flight Vehicle MOPs met Accurate flight predictions Discovery of design flaws in first pass Accurate simulation of key phenomena – no surprises in flight Discovery of design flaws in first pass Insight into design refinements required to meet vehicle MOPs SDD$/Total $ T&E $/SDD $ # and severity of quality escapes CIP $/SDD $ SDD Time/Acquisition Time Total Wind Tunnel hours Total Flight Test hours # design defects discovered Time and cost to resolve defects Relative impact on LCC of defects discovered # design defects discovered Time and cost to resolve defects Relative impact on LCC of defects discovered Total Wind Tunnel hours Total Flight Test hours # design defects discovered Time and cost to resolve defects Relative impact on LCC of defects discovered Data accuracy (bias and precision) $/data point $/UOH Polars/hour Vehicle mission coverage Summary:  Summary Major Gains to be Made by Emphasizing Effectiveness, Not Just Efficiency Increasing Effectiveness Drives Several Key Aspects of the AF T&E Roadmap Vision Institute T&E expeditionary mindset over weapon system life cycle Enable Integrated Test Teams with independent verification capability Institutionalize feedback on T&E processes Build Integrated DT/OT processes …And We Haven’t Even Talked about System of Systems and Interoperability Testing Trained People and Improved Processes Are More Important to Effectiveness than Facilities Vision for Air Force Test & Evaluation:  Vision for Air Force Test & Evaluation Or how we all survived without killing each other… George Kailiwai III Technical Advisor, Air Force Flight Test Center Vision for Air Force Test & Evaluation Air Force Flight Test Center :  Vision for Air Force Test & Evaluation Air Force Flight Test Center We’re in this all together. A “family” can overcome any adversity. Family members may not always agree, but in the end, family members generally make decisions that are best for the family. Collaboration & teaming to date has been “UNPRECEDENTED” Collaboration & teaming will be crucial to future success Thank AFMC/A3 for leading the effort and AEDC, 46th TW, AFOTEC and AF/TE for having the courage to take the first steps…. 46TW Perspective Mr. Bob Arnold:  46TW Perspective Mr. Bob Arnold AFOTEC Perspective Col. Joe Arvai for Mr. Doug Marlowe:  AFOTEC Perspective Col. Joe Arvai for Mr. Doug Marlowe AF/TE Perspective Mr. Wally Beard for Mr. Dave Hamilton :  AF/TE Perspective Mr. Wally Beard for Mr. Dave Hamilton Panel Discussion Moderator: Mr. Dave Bond:  Panel Discussion Moderator: Mr. Dave Bond

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Breezy

Plant Anatomy
03. 01. 2008
0 views

Plant Anatomy

Learning Long Division
15. 06. 2007
0 views

Learning Long Division

ADO Net
24. 10. 2007
0 views

ADO Net

Ch 2 Chemistry of Life
05. 01. 2008
0 views

Ch 2 Chemistry of Life

REORGANIZATION
27. 09. 2007
0 views

REORGANIZATION

Enhanced Fujita Scale 6 23 04
05. 10. 2007
0 views

Enhanced Fujita Scale 6 23 04

severe convection punkka
07. 10. 2007
0 views

severe convection punkka

lsad07 psp
09. 10. 2007
0 views

lsad07 psp

idioms1
10. 10. 2007
0 views

idioms1

SabadosCiencia2006
13. 10. 2007
0 views

SabadosCiencia2006

Rousset EID06
19. 10. 2007
0 views

Rousset EID06

TheodoreRoosevelt
22. 10. 2007
0 views

TheodoreRoosevelt

Timss
17. 10. 2007
0 views

Timss

Wynn ASA 2000
04. 10. 2007
0 views

Wynn ASA 2000

aas strom
29. 08. 2007
0 views

aas strom

element connections
29. 08. 2007
0 views

element connections

hwr clustering
29. 08. 2007
0 views

hwr clustering

Pov map 20060717 1
29. 11. 2007
0 views

Pov map 20060717 1

CONSTRUCTING BUD VASES ADN BOWS
11. 12. 2007
0 views

CONSTRUCTING BUD VASES ADN BOWS

nobel talk
15. 10. 2007
0 views

nobel talk

18 FOSIS
24. 10. 2007
0 views

18 FOSIS

Lec 08 FO1 06 Urbanisation
01. 11. 2007
0 views

Lec 08 FO1 06 Urbanisation

America vs The World
22. 10. 2007
0 views

America vs The World

Vasco Da Gama Slide Show
07. 11. 2007
0 views

Vasco Da Gama Slide Show

Fliess
15. 11. 2007
0 views

Fliess

01 threat
19. 11. 2007
0 views

01 threat

Konsolen
21. 11. 2007
0 views

Konsolen

the dancers
23. 11. 2007
0 views

the dancers

Probil
26. 11. 2007
0 views

Probil

UNE Benz
27. 11. 2007
0 views

UNE Benz

Galaxies
29. 08. 2007
0 views

Galaxies

DB2 XML DatabaseFINAL
23. 10. 2007
0 views

DB2 XML DatabaseFINAL

akzonobel
15. 10. 2007
0 views

akzonobel

ilana
29. 08. 2007
0 views

ilana

lauter
07. 11. 2007
0 views

lauter

GradSch GPOs
04. 10. 2007
0 views

GradSch GPOs

PHYS402 01
16. 10. 2007
0 views

PHYS402 01

cry beloved
02. 08. 2007
0 views

cry beloved

curtis
02. 08. 2007
0 views

curtis

Chaplet of Divine Mercy
02. 08. 2007
0 views

Chaplet of Divine Mercy

CS583 opinion mining
02. 08. 2007
0 views

CS583 opinion mining

A TIME FOR ANDREW Pres 2
02. 08. 2007
0 views

A TIME FOR ANDREW Pres 2

arthur powerpoint 11 20 03
02. 08. 2007
0 views

arthur powerpoint 11 20 03

cheryl toner ific
02. 08. 2007
0 views

cheryl toner ific

bats
02. 08. 2007
0 views

bats

23 stavros thurs
02. 08. 2007
0 views

23 stavros thurs

aas04 jeff
29. 08. 2007
0 views

aas04 jeff

moustakis
29. 08. 2007
0 views

moustakis

irsurveys07
29. 08. 2007
0 views

irsurveys07

venice oct03
29. 08. 2007
0 views

venice oct03

Office of Homeleand Security
29. 10. 2007
0 views

Office of Homeleand Security

agn presentation 102106
29. 08. 2007
0 views

agn presentation 102106

ReginaSchulteLadbeck 042104
29. 08. 2007
0 views

ReginaSchulteLadbeck 042104

Weingarten
03. 01. 2008
0 views

Weingarten

Presentation NASDAQ
24. 02. 2008
0 views

Presentation NASDAQ

nov retail ebony
24. 02. 2008
0 views

nov retail ebony

APAsymp04AIDMAN
02. 08. 2007
0 views

APAsymp04AIDMAN

Beloved
02. 08. 2007
0 views

Beloved

2004 4050S1 11 Levin
02. 08. 2007
0 views

2004 4050S1 11 Levin

Konstantinidis
29. 09. 2007
0 views

Konstantinidis

Qin and Han Dynasties
25. 03. 2008
0 views

Qin and Han Dynasties

andy powell presentation
02. 08. 2007
0 views

andy powell presentation

arena rome minier
13. 11. 2007
0 views

arena rome minier

Presentation010605
10. 04. 2008
0 views

Presentation010605

03edclark lecture
13. 04. 2008
0 views

03edclark lecture

richard mushotzky
29. 08. 2007
0 views

richard mushotzky

Lawrence D Boston 2006
14. 04. 2008
0 views

Lawrence D Boston 2006

DMCH13
16. 04. 2008
0 views

DMCH13

ERates
17. 04. 2008
0 views

ERates

JHAN 14
18. 04. 2008
0 views

JHAN 14

4884061 firstfileFILE
22. 04. 2008
0 views

4884061 firstfileFILE

ppt26
23. 12. 2007
0 views

ppt26

Operations
28. 04. 2008
0 views

Operations

CH10 Outline
07. 04. 2008
0 views

CH10 Outline

CIM research
30. 04. 2008
0 views

CIM research

komossa
29. 08. 2007
0 views

komossa

ieee sp 2004
18. 06. 2007
0 views

ieee sp 2004

icws 2006 3
18. 06. 2007
0 views

icws 2006 3

ICTP intro
18. 06. 2007
0 views

ICTP intro

human mating beh 2005
18. 06. 2007
0 views

human mating beh 2005

IMDS CIESP
14. 11. 2007
0 views

IMDS CIESP

welch adv camp july05
02. 10. 2007
0 views

welch adv camp july05

Glycosylation
15. 06. 2007
0 views

Glycosylation

Making a Story Board
15. 06. 2007
0 views

Making a Story Board

Story Literary Elements
15. 06. 2007
0 views

Story Literary Elements

Life Cycle of Plants and Animals
15. 06. 2007
0 views

Life Cycle of Plants and Animals

Session1Alila
02. 11. 2007
0 views

Session1Alila

beetleborers
02. 01. 2008
0 views

beetleborers

2006 IADB
10. 10. 2007
0 views

2006 IADB

robo wk1
03. 01. 2008
0 views

robo wk1

Rosemary Panama
22. 10. 2007
0 views

Rosemary Panama

ec06nicapan
25. 10. 2007
0 views

ec06nicapan

Allies Pre Training Module
02. 08. 2007
0 views

Allies Pre Training Module

Carmona
30. 12. 2007
0 views

Carmona

TheSuccessofSingapor e2006
27. 03. 2008
0 views

TheSuccessofSingapor e2006

Advisory Board Presentation
02. 08. 2007
0 views

Advisory Board Presentation

Cameron SAS44 A Century of OA
27. 02. 2008
0 views

Cameron SAS44 A Century of OA

dubrovnik
16. 10. 2007
0 views

dubrovnik

sprfett
07. 01. 2008
0 views

sprfett

mccune albright syndrome
15. 10. 2007
0 views

mccune albright syndrome

michael soendermann 2007
18. 10. 2007
0 views

michael soendermann 2007

astro12Summer12
29. 08. 2007
0 views

astro12Summer12

familyweek1
19. 02. 2008
0 views

familyweek1