report pixel2000

Information about report pixel2000

Published on November 1, 2007

Author: Javier

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Pixel 2000 Genova – june 5-8, 2000 http://www.ge.infn.it/Pix2000/slides.html Internal report :  Pixel 2000 Genova – june 5-8, 2000 http://www.ge.infn.it/Pix2000/slides.html Internal report Pixel meeting June 12, 2000 G. Chiodini – Fermilab Overview Rad-hard Sensors (Marina) Rad-hard electronics Hybridization Pixel Module Mechanics and cooling Test beam results Monolithic pixels and 3D pixels X-ray imaging (…, HPD) Miscellanea Rad-hard electronics:  Rad-hard electronics All speakers and experimental results validate the Abder’s conclusion: “Deep SubMicron CMOS process is the right way to go” ALICE2Test chip irradiated with X, g, and p survives up to 30 Mrad: W. Snoeys (ALICE beam test) and F.Meddi (ALICE review talk) Review talks of P.F. Manfredi (FE) and P. Jarron (RH-FE) discussed about DSM: Likely high yield and low cost. Total Irradiated Dose Effect: outstanding performance with enclosed geometry and guard ring for n-channel Mosfets. Single Event Latch-up: good immunity (DMILL is immune to it) Single Event Gate Rupture: no evidence in ALICE2Test chip up to 9×1014 p/cm2. Single Event Upset: is an issue (true for all technologies) solved only by circuit design techniques and became worse going to 0.18 or 0.15 micron. Electrostatic Discharge Sensitive worse going to 0.18 or 0.15 micron. Hybridizations (1/3):  Hybridizations (1/3) Talk review given by M. Caccia Delphi experience 106 pixels and 150 module Final yield 36 % (not acceptable for ATLAS) Real solutions are: Indium bump-bonding (industrial standard, room temperature, UBM is not complicate). Solder -above all flux less- (not industrial standard, UBM is complicate). R. Horisberg: Development of indium bumping at PSI (some secret recipes) Mass production (400 modules 2004-2005) UBM made by companies Reflow oven (for indium!) and Flip-chip for ATLAS pixel module Spherical 20 mm diameter bumps after reflow Bumps deposited only on the read out chip (for indium!) Larger strength achieved In (273psi) , In-Ag (800psi) , and In-Sn(1720psi) Hybridizations (2/3):  Hybridizations (2/3) Round table discussion on bump-bonding Industrial partners AMS (Rome, indium) IZM (Berlin, MCM-D module, solder, electroplating, reflow, 120minute/wafer all bumps inspection) VTT electronics (Finland, solder, electroplating, reflow, no flux) AIT (Usa) sent out an email (I am trying to have it) Discussed topics 8” wafer for 50 mm pitch (A. Mekkaui’s question) Needed for DSM No one is ready now Module reworkability (M. Caccia’s question) Homogeneous detachment and re-bonding Cleaning the surfaces Not a problem for indium but for solder (thermal shock at high T for the chip) Mechanical stress of the sensor (M. Caccia’s talk: no problem for the indium) Companies don’t like that: a reworkability line parallel to the production line Large dead area probability (P. Delpierre’s question) Opposite to random 10-5 failure rate quoted up to now Impact on final yield Hybridizations (3/3):  Hybridizations (3/3) Alenia Marconi System (Rome) Very simple process T<500 C and no reflow for indium Thinner chip bonded (lower T and lower P is enough to succeed) Same evaporation system for every step Wafer protected by photo resist in every step High yield, but problems with dies Wafer up to 6” They are thinking about to go to 8’’ wafers Investment in the deposition chamber to increase the size (several hundreds K$) Other equipments are ready C. Gemme: Study of indium bumping for the ATLAS pixel detector 2pixels/Fechip failure rare Threshold from 2000e to 4000e after bonding (7mm+7mm=8mm) Pixel module (1/2):  Pixel module (1/2) P.Netchaeva: results on 0.7% X0 thick pixel modules for the Atlas detector 0.7% X0 Material budget (Two metal layer?) Silicon glue, thermo-camera test of T uniformity One tested module from Boeing (150 mm thinned ROC by GDSI after bumping) Two test module from AMS (156 mm thinned ROC by Okamoto after bumping) P.Skubic: Flex Circuit designs for the Atlas pixel detector Design rules, simulation with Maxwell-Spice link, and comparison with test bench Wire bonding experience Vendor experience a lot of companies, only one produced non working sample Cleo III experience with GE (General Electric Corporate Research and Development NY) Flex hybrid Atlas module (LBL) beam test at CERN in May ’99 (SnPb bumps, good results) C.Grah: Pixel-detector modules using MCM-D technology Good bench test and beam test results presented Personal informal discussion suggest to me that it is not reliable up to now Pixel module (2/2):  Pixel module (2/2) I. Gregor: Optical links for the ATLAS SCT and Pixel detector Test on Rad-Hardness for SCT optical link (for Pixel optical link in the near future) SEU can be fixed sending more light Beam Test:  Beam Test L.Perera: Diamond pixel detectors W. Snoeys: OMEGA3 (ALICE+LHCb) chip in DSM process irradiated with 9×1014 p/cm2 the threshold is changed but not dramatically M.Aleppo: A measurement of Lorentz angle of rad-hard pixel sensors Model Agreement test beam results and model T. lari: A measurement of spatial resolution of Atlas pixel sensors 6 mm telescope resolution Large multiple scattering Error prediction subtracted from the residual distribution gaussian sigma Pixel module beam test already discussed Mechanics and cooling:  Mechanics and cooling M. Olcese: Mechanics and cooling for pixel detectors Fluorocarbon coolants are the best choice for pixel (stable, good thermal properties, relatively low viscosity at low temperature) Glue chip-support is an issue Phone conversation about BTeV design Miscellanea:  Miscellanea G. Bolla: Measurements of prototype pixel sensors for CMS Analog data optical driver Readout architecture bypassing bad chip or bad column or bad pixel in the token readout. Controlling the single chip average rate to see if there are runaway in the system The reset must be local SEU about 1Hz S. Seidel: Capacitance of Silicon pixels Test bench for Atlas sensors Cback plane = 10-20 fF about 15% total C Cpspray =128 fF and Cpstop = 80 fF CSeiko < CCiS (Why?) Contribution to total C from first neighbors 11%, from after first neighbors 7%

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Javier

wap
26. 11. 2007
0 views

wap

PairashThajchayapong1
02. 01. 2008
0 views

PairashThajchayapong1

Lecture13 1
09. 10. 2007
0 views

Lecture13 1

Physical Features of Arab World
24. 10. 2007
0 views

Physical Features of Arab World

arbovirus
24. 10. 2007
0 views

arbovirus

Ch14 Lecture
29. 11. 2007
0 views

Ch14 Lecture

going in 13may02
01. 12. 2007
0 views

going in 13may02

cap3
14. 11. 2007
0 views

cap3

enfoques 4 ppt
15. 11. 2007
0 views

enfoques 4 ppt

DeafTalk
16. 11. 2007
0 views

DeafTalk

db2
19. 11. 2007
0 views

db2

REACH Overview
05. 12. 2007
0 views

REACH Overview

Romantic English Literature
14. 12. 2007
0 views

Romantic English Literature

Treaty of Versailles
23. 12. 2007
0 views

Treaty of Versailles

conman15
28. 12. 2007
0 views

conman15

intro CS 1
04. 01. 2008
0 views

intro CS 1

Radiation Concepts
04. 01. 2008
0 views

Radiation Concepts

Kryptologie Folien Web
05. 01. 2008
0 views

Kryptologie Folien Web

meld ldp iros07 talk3
07. 01. 2008
0 views

meld ldp iros07 talk3

bird
29. 10. 2007
0 views

bird

Ideal Year 2006
02. 11. 2007
0 views

Ideal Year 2006

Saggia Ecologia Presentazione
01. 10. 2007
0 views

Saggia Ecologia Presentazione

Royal Europe consumer
30. 10. 2007
0 views

Royal Europe consumer

Undergrat Presentation 2004
24. 10. 2007
0 views

Undergrat Presentation 2004

Johnson 1
06. 11. 2007
0 views

Johnson 1

USA Presentation Rev 4
08. 11. 2007
0 views

USA Presentation Rev 4

Divisenko
20. 11. 2007
0 views

Divisenko

Civil Society Index Project
23. 11. 2007
0 views

Civil Society Index Project

Unit07Log
01. 11. 2007
0 views

Unit07Log

presentaz roma trieste 4
29. 10. 2007
0 views

presentaz roma trieste 4

Montana Meth Presentation
27. 12. 2007
0 views

Montana Meth Presentation

careerbuilder
20. 02. 2008
0 views

careerbuilder

Brussels 11May06
25. 10. 2007
0 views

Brussels 11May06

EDMT14
27. 02. 2008
0 views

EDMT14

pisanelli
30. 10. 2007
0 views

pisanelli

Newch6www
29. 02. 2008
0 views

Newch6www

tunnista kulutustyyppisi
05. 11. 2007
0 views

tunnista kulutustyyppisi

StratTac06 Leggett
05. 03. 2008
0 views

StratTac06 Leggett

Teela powerpoint 6
14. 03. 2008
0 views

Teela powerpoint 6

67436
27. 03. 2008
0 views

67436

dli20071
30. 03. 2008
0 views

dli20071

GEP2007
25. 10. 2007
0 views

GEP2007

hort2 floraldesign
11. 12. 2007
0 views

hort2 floraldesign

Kodal MALTA
04. 10. 2007
0 views

Kodal MALTA

bcs 03 nottingham
26. 11. 2007
0 views

bcs 03 nottingham

17 Sussex
17. 12. 2007
0 views

17 Sussex

asdc ncss for website ihc
06. 11. 2007
0 views

asdc ncss for website ihc

frieman
15. 11. 2007
0 views

frieman

Sem Grd Ontology
19. 11. 2007
0 views

Sem Grd Ontology

Underground1
06. 12. 2007
0 views

Underground1

Avape Port
16. 11. 2007
0 views

Avape Port

ceciliat2
28. 12. 2007
0 views

ceciliat2

diane guatelli
31. 10. 2007
0 views

diane guatelli

cacti
12. 12. 2007
0 views

cacti

Attila Vitai Vodafone
26. 11. 2007
0 views

Attila Vitai Vodafone

kevin dustin
13. 11. 2007
0 views

kevin dustin

02 Italy Gorgucci
31. 10. 2007
0 views

02 Italy Gorgucci

wp4status russia2
26. 10. 2007
0 views

wp4status russia2