RJanda Keynote SCEA2002

Information about RJanda Keynote SCEA2002

Published on December 29, 2007

Author: luie

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Cost Realism and Analysis — Renewed Focus in Today’s Environment:  Cost Realism and Analysis — Renewed Focus in Today’s Environment June 2002 Richard Janda Vice President Independent Cost Evaluation Lockheed Martin Corp Agenda :  Agenda Environment Cost Performance Path Forward Audience Questions Environment:  Environment Environment:  Environment Defense Industry Consolidated into a Few Large Players Intense Competition Budget Impact High Debt. . . Competitive Stratification Defense Industry an Oligopoly . . .BA $35.80. . . .LMT $43.95. . . .NG $94.80. . . .Raytheon $31.50. . . .BAE. . . .$5.19. . . .EADS $11.28. . . 4 SCEA June 2002.ppt Environment :  Environment 5 SCEA June 2002.ppt Industry Margins Eroded-Single Digit ROS Common Industry ROS Below Historic Average Industry Operating Margins 1999 2000 2001 General Dynamics 12.7% 12.8% 12.3% Northrop Grumman 12.7% 15.1% 7.9% Raytheon 9.3% 9.6 9.0% Boeing 6.5% 6.7% 8.6% Lockheed Martin 7.2% 7.0% 7.5% R & D Subsidies of 90’s Fierce Competition For Few Remaining Opportunities Performance Issues Over Supply Remains Corporate Credibility Being Tested “Enronitis” Wall Street Ready to Punish Weak Performance Source: Annual Reports/10Ks Environment Favorable DoD Policy Changes Emerging :  Eliminated Paid Cost Rule Ordered End of R&D Subsidies Increased Progress Payments Encouraging Performance-based Payments Permit Contractor Share in Cost Savings Under Consideration Government Receptive To Industry Issues Environment Favorable DoD Policy Changes Emerging 6 SCEA June 2002.ppt Slide7:  1910 1950 1970 1990 0 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Environment Threats Drive Defense Spending Defense Spending as % of GDP Source: Lexington Institute 1930 WWII Korea Vietnam Cold War WWI 2007 Est. 9/11/01 Berlin Wall 12/07/41 Cuban Missile Crisis Desert Storm Environment DoD Budget Authority :  Environment DoD Budget Authority Current $ in Billions Bush Proposed 5 Year Budget Plan MILPERS O&M Procurement RDT&E Other QDR:  QDR From “Threat” Based to “Capability” Based Key Goals Assure Allies Dissuade Adversaries Deter Aggression Decisively Defeat Operational Challenges Protect the Homeland Guarantee Information Systems Project Power Deny Sanctuary, Greater Surveillance Strengthen Space Operations Apply New IT Concepts (C4ISR) Recapitalization, Homeland Security, Transformation 9 SCEA June 2002.ppt Environment:  Current $ in Billions MILPERS O&M Procurement RDT&E Other Bush Proposed 5 Year Budget Plan Environment Budget Stability Improving Spiral Development Nunn-McCurdy Enforcement Defense Budgets More Realistic 10 SCEA June 2002.ppt Environment:  Environment Summary Defense Industry an Oligopoly with Unfavorable Operating Margins Government Receptive to Improving Industry National Security Dependent on Successful Transformation From “Threat” to “Capability” Deterrence The Path To Success is Through Solid Execution and Improved Performance The Nation Needs Good Performance! 11 SCEA June 2002.ppt Cost Performance:  Cost Performance “The inability to control the cost of modern weapons is arguably America’s greatest long-term military vulnerability.” Fallows, James “Uncle Sam Buys An Airplane.” The Atlantic Monthly June 2002: 62-74. Cost Performance:  Cost Performance Too Many Major Overruns SBIRS High Space Station Global Hawk Theater Ballistic Missile Defense What’s Causing The Cost Growth. . .? Source: Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) December 31, 2001 Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance:  Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance :  Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance Proceeding Rightly From a Wrong Premise Estimating Cost Based on an Unsound Assumption Masks Significant Cost Risk. When (Not If) the Program Over-Runs, the Original Estimate will be Remembered but the Under-lying Assumptions Will Not Validate Assumptions. Do Not Assume Away Risk! Abbott: I say Who's on first, What's on second, I Don't Know's on third - Costello: You know the fellows' names? Abbott: Certainly! Costello: Well then who's on first? Abbott: Yes! Costello: I mean the fellow's name! Abbott: Who! Costello: The guy on first! 15 SCEA June 2002.ppt Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d):  Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) New Learning Curve Theory As the Quantity Increases, the Unit Price Does Not Change, and May Go Up If the Tasks are Not Highly Routinized, Repetitive, Labor Intensive, and Without Gaps, There is No Learning Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d):  Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) Do Not Mistake the Act of Planning for Actually Having a Plan Series of Program Plans D’Jour is a Certain Indicator of a Program in Trouble Today’s Plan Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d):  New Moore’s Law Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) For Development, Proven Trend of Less Cost Per Unit of Computer Function Equates to Greater Functionality for Same Cost, Not Less Cost (e.g., Hrs/Dwg) Graph Source: http;//www.intel.com/research/silicon/mooreslaw.htm Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d):  New Math Concepts Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) EVM New Math (.9 + 1.1) ÷ 2 = 1.3 at Complete Cum CPIs of 0.9 Can Never Be Offset by 1.1 TCPIs, Unless Aided by Outstanding Negotiation of Additional Scope Synergy Savings Formulae: $1.00 – 30¢ = $1.00 Unless Demonstrated, Benefits of New Initiatives Should Not be Assumed New Ways of Doing Business to Save Cost is Good Practice, Assuming 100% Realization of Same is Risky Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d):  20 SCEA June 2002.ppt Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) Test As You Fly A Test Plan That Does Not Replicate Flight-like Conditions is Incomplete and Underscoped. Cutting This Corner Will Cause You To Pay Later in Spades. Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d):  Schedule, Schedule, Schedule Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) Aggressive, Accelerated Program Schedules Ensure Major Slips and Cost Growth. 21 SCEA June 2002.ppt http://www.sotafx.com/Roger/Gallery/Jack.html Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d):  Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) COTS = Certain Overrun To Schedule High Percentage of COTs/Heritage/Re-use Software Code in Development Means High Percent Overrun High Growth Low Growth Low COTS Assumed High COTS Assumed % of COTS/Re-use/Re-host S/W Assumed Total S/W Cost Growth % Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d):  Soft Funding = Hard Times Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) Changes in Funding Are Always Less Than Resulting Changes in Cost (Cumulative Impacts) Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d):  Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) Precision Without Accuracy Poor Up-front Definition of Requirements, Including Their Decomposition and Flowdown, and Program Plan (Technical, Contractual, Schedule and Cost) Portends a Troubled Program and a Cost Baseline Without Credibility Path Forward:  Path Forward Path Forward Good Example - JSF Acquisition Approach:  Path Forward Good Example - JSF Acquisition Approach Phased Down Select to Award Parametric Life Cycle Cost Data by Anticipated Phase From Each Competitor Shoulder-to-Shoulder Review Reconciliation of Cost Estimates Between USG and Contractor Encourage, Identify, Fund and Prototype Cost Reduction Candidates Early During the Down Select Process Do Not Encourage Contractor Investment 26 SCEA June 2002.ppt Path Forward Good Example - JSF Acquisition Approach:  Weight Evaluation Criteria Toward Performance and Realistic Cost, Not Lowest Cost Recognize the Risk Associated with the Work Scope and Use the Appropriate Contract Type Development – Cost Plus Production – Wait Until Risk has Been Mitigated Incentivize the Winner for Good, Balanced Performance: Technical, Schedule and Cost Path Forward Good Example - JSF Acquisition Approach 27 SCEA June 2002.ppt Path Forward Contractors Should. . .:  Path Forward Contractors Should. . . 28 SCEA June 2002.ppt 28 SCEA June 2002.ppt Vigilantly Protect Against “The Top Ten” Perform Independent Cost Evaluations (ICE) of Their “Single Best Estimates” to Validate and Substantiate Credibility Reconcile Program Estimates & Independent Assessments Between Customer & Contractor Understand Differences & Rationale But. . . Maintain Independence & Propriety Path Forward Contractors Should . . . (Continued):  Path Forward Contractors Should . . . (Continued) 29 SCEA June 2002.ppt Track Estimates & Calibrate/Adjust Estimating Systems/Process/Models for Improved Accuracy Establish & Maintain “Headlight” Metrics Above & Beyond Standard Earned Value to Assure Early Warning of Performance & Risk Issues Conclusion:  Conclusion U.S. Government and Aerospace Contractors Must “Partner For Success” While Maintaining Arms Length Relationship Open and Candid Communication To Ensure Success Proper Contract Type Successful Business Plans For Customer & Contractor Stable Program Requirements & Funding

Related presentations


Other presentations created by luie

Biomass part 2
07. 01. 2008
0 views

Biomass part 2

hladik iogen
16. 11. 2007
0 views

hladik iogen

Ethanol Tank Fire
09. 11. 2007
0 views

Ethanol Tank Fire

ADSL Introduction
30. 11. 2007
0 views

ADSL Introduction

Ted Bundy and John Wayne Gacy1
06. 11. 2007
0 views

Ted Bundy and John Wayne Gacy1

Britain Alone
13. 11. 2007
0 views

Britain Alone

dm2
19. 11. 2007
0 views

dm2

I 10 relocation
17. 12. 2007
0 views

I 10 relocation

alimentazione
21. 11. 2007
0 views

alimentazione

lian maze iptps06
19. 12. 2007
0 views

lian maze iptps06

LAMAQUINA
31. 12. 2007
0 views

LAMAQUINA

H114j
04. 01. 2008
0 views

H114j

3 LifeCycles
04. 01. 2008
0 views

3 LifeCycles

Kids
30. 12. 2007
0 views

Kids

China 4
10. 10. 2007
0 views

China 4

Corepartnerpresentat ions070128
29. 12. 2007
0 views

Corepartnerpresentat ions070128

standard minimill stiffness
28. 02. 2008
0 views

standard minimill stiffness

Lecture12 spring05 POST
06. 03. 2008
0 views

Lecture12 spring05 POST

PPF Apr11
10. 03. 2008
0 views

PPF Apr11

anderson e
12. 03. 2008
0 views

anderson e

2007 Travel in the UK and Europe
14. 03. 2008
0 views

2007 Travel in the UK and Europe

204 011 06 Lonc PPT
18. 03. 2008
0 views

204 011 06 Lonc PPT

swanoverview
21. 03. 2008
0 views

swanoverview

pandemicplanning
27. 03. 2008
0 views

pandemicplanning

introess
07. 04. 2008
0 views

introess

ComissionErasmusMund usECW
30. 03. 2008
0 views

ComissionErasmusMund usECW

AustEnergySummitv2
13. 04. 2008
0 views

AustEnergySummitv2

Probate
14. 11. 2007
0 views

Probate

bhatt ethics
07. 01. 2008
0 views

bhatt ethics

7 K Chang presentation final
04. 03. 2008
0 views

7 K Chang presentation final

Goerens
04. 01. 2008
0 views

Goerens

QuickTourOfHowNow
03. 10. 2007
0 views

QuickTourOfHowNow

DeaconDrive
02. 10. 2007
0 views

DeaconDrive

ACM CCSM3 Tutorial
28. 11. 2007
0 views

ACM CCSM3 Tutorial

Eisenberg David Langmuir Probe
03. 01. 2008
0 views

Eisenberg David Langmuir Probe