Singapore Arts Festival 2006 Audience Survey

Information about Singapore Arts Festival 2006 Audience Survey

Published on January 23, 2008

Author: Pasquale

Source: authorstream.com

Content

Slide1:  SINGAPORE ARTS FESTIVAL SURVEY 2006 AUDIENCE SURVEY - HIGHLIGHTS 30 Aug 2006 Background:  Background Aims of Survey: To understand SAF2006 Audience Profile Motivation to attend & Satisfaction Attendance & Spending Patterns Sources of Information Last survey commissioned: 1999 Methodology of SAF 2006 Survey: Self-administered post-show survey Total sample of 4,536 respondents from 24 Ticketed Productions and 7 Non-Ticketed Productions Local & Tourists, 15 years and above Highlights:  Highlights Profile of SAF 2006 audience Age, Occupation, Local/Tourist Motivation Reasons for attending SAF 2006 Sources of information on SAF2006 Satisfaction SAF06 - Quality of production, Variety Individual performances - Quality of performance, Experience Top 10 ticketed productions Attendance patterns Frequency Type of performance for future Festivals Spending patterns Associated spending for attending SAF 2006 ticketed performances Profile of tourists who attended SAF 2006 Comparisons with 1999 survey Profile of SAF 2006 Audiences:  Profile of SAF 2006 Audiences Age Profile of Attendees:  Age Profile of Attendees % (n=4416) Tends to be younger than general population Age Profile of Attendees:  Age Profile of Attendees % Dominance of teens in non-ticketed audience Ticketed: n = 3596 Non-Ticketed: n = 852 Occupational Profile of Attendees:  Occupational Profile of Attendees % Nearly half – professionals More than a third - students (n=2960) Occupational Profile of Attendees:  Occupational Profile of Attendees % 4 in 10 at non-ticketed performances - students Ticketed: n = 2414 Non-Ticketed: n = 561 Changing Profile of Attendees:  Changing Profile of Attendees % Large increase in 15-19 y.o. attendees came at the expense of the 40-59 y.o. group Reasons for attending SAF 2006:  Reasons for attending SAF 2006 Base, n: 4536 Interest in this production For entertainment Attractive pricing / Free performance For relaxation For personal enrichment Reputation of artists / arts company Recommendation by friends / colleagues / relatives Reviews by media For networking and socialising Others Top 3 Reasons :  Top 3 Reasons Ticketed performance audience: Interest in the performance (54%) For entertainment (39%) For personal enrichment (33%) Non-ticketed performance audience For entertainment (16%) Interest in the performance (14%) Free performances (13%) 72% happened to be passing by Sources of Information on SAF 2006:  Sources of Information on SAF 2006 Base, n: 4536 Sources of Information on SAF 2006:  Sources of Information on SAF 2006 Ticketed performance audience: Festival brochures and leaflets (46%) Word of mouth (30%) Newspaper articles (29%) Internet (28%) Non-ticketed performance audience: Newspaper articles (24%) Banners (22%) Radio (22%) Newspaper advertisements (21%) Satisfaction with SAF 2006:  Satisfaction with SAF 2006 Quality of Productions % Overall Ticketed programmes Non-ticketed programmes Locals Tourists Breakdown for those who attended Ticketed/ Non-ticketed performances as well as for Locals/ Tourists 14 60 55 58 51 18 21 20 24 Satisfaction with SAF 2006:  Satisfaction with SAF 2006 Variety of Programmes Ticketed programmes Non-ticketed programmes Locals Tourists % Overall Breakdown for those who attended Ticketed/ Non-ticketed performances as well as for Locals/ Tourists Satisfaction with SAF 2006:  Satisfaction with SAF 2006 Being an International Arts Festival Ticketed programmes Non-ticketed programmes Locals Tourists % Overall Breakdown for those who attended Ticketed/ Non-ticketed performances as well as for Locals/ Tourists Satisfaction with Individual Performances :  Satisfaction with Individual Performances Overall Breakdown for those who attended Ticketed/ Non-ticketed performances as well as for Locals/ Tourists % Quality of Performance Satisfaction with Individual Performances:  Overall Experience Overall Breakdown for those who attended Ticketed/ Non-ticketed performances as well as for Locals/ Tourists % Satisfaction with Individual Performances Top 5 Ticketed Productions :  Top 5 Ticketed Productions Productions with highest % of “Excellent” ratings Attendance Patterns:  Attendance Patterns Frequency Average - 3 (ticketed & non-ticketed) performances. 69% of respondents attended 1 or 2 ticketed performances 24% attended 3-5 ticketed performances 7% attended 6 or more performances First-time attendees Ticketed performances – 39% of audience Non-ticketed performances – 65% of audience “Frequent flyers” 35% repeat attendees More than half of repeat attendees have attended the festival 3 times or more Types of Performances:  Types of Performances % of audience who would be “interested” or “very interested” in seeing these in future Festivals Types of Performances:  Types of Performances % of audience who would be “very interested” in seeing these in future Festivals Spending Patterns:  Spending Patterns Average total spending* - $93 (admission tickets, F&B, local transport and shopping/souvenirs) Average amount spent on admission tickets - $60 *when attending a ticketed performance Profile of Tourists @ SAF2006:  Profile of Tourists @ SAF2006 Information 62% first heard about the festival before their arrival in Singapore. Motivation For 41%, SAF2006 was one of the reasons why they visited Singapore. Duration of Stay 52% - >5 days 37% - 3-5 days 17% extended stay because of SAF2006 Average spending for trip to Singapore - $2,100. (travel expense to Singapore, local accommodation, F&B expenses) Comparisons with 1999 Survey:  Comparisons with 1999 Survey Profile % of 15-19 year olds, and student attendees doubled % of >40 years fell from 26% in 1999 to 21% in 2006 More males are attending SAF From 38% in 1999 to 49% in 2006 Malay attendees have doubled Tourists attending SAF have trebled Comparisons with 1999 Survey:  Comparisons with 1999 Survey Top 5 Motivations for attending SAF performances Comparisons with 1999 Survey:  Comparisons with 1999 Survey Top 5 Main Sources of Information about SAF Comparisons with 1999 Survey:  Comparisons with 1999 Survey Slide29:  Summary

Related presentations


Other presentations created by Pasquale

ancient olympic games
02. 05. 2008
0 views

ancient olympic games

VRA Glass Markets Presentation
09. 01. 2008
0 views

VRA Glass Markets Presentation

AppliedMechanics
13. 01. 2008
0 views

AppliedMechanics

Chapter9
15. 01. 2008
0 views

Chapter9

2007Somera
15. 01. 2008
0 views

2007Somera

puschel spiral
16. 01. 2008
0 views

puschel spiral

Excavations2
19. 01. 2008
0 views

Excavations2

NCMA Berry Amendment Rex Bragaw
22. 01. 2008
0 views

NCMA Berry Amendment Rex Bragaw

moscowforumenglish
23. 01. 2008
0 views

moscowforumenglish

BEEDL 123a finalPPT v6
04. 02. 2008
0 views

BEEDL 123a finalPPT v6

universal inbox ericsson2000
04. 02. 2008
0 views

universal inbox ericsson2000

Hydrogen Economy
05. 02. 2008
0 views

Hydrogen Economy

Joos QCSE07
09. 01. 2008
0 views

Joos QCSE07

ravenous uk ltd
29. 01. 2008
0 views

ravenous uk ltd

WNC07
07. 02. 2008
0 views

WNC07

PalliativeCare
15. 01. 2008
0 views

PalliativeCare

electronID
20. 01. 2008
0 views

electronID

WatershedCommunicati onChannels
26. 02. 2008
0 views

WatershedCommunicati onChannels

20070306
28. 02. 2008
0 views

20070306

Course chp
16. 01. 2008
0 views

Course chp

RichmondRegionalMobi litySystem
31. 01. 2008
0 views

RichmondRegionalMobi litySystem

lebilinguisme Mar2703
29. 02. 2008
0 views

lebilinguisme Mar2703

05 a NCEM Brownian v1
25. 01. 2008
0 views

05 a NCEM Brownian v1

Ergo Keween
05. 03. 2008
0 views

Ergo Keween

SLiCE
14. 03. 2008
0 views

SLiCE

Transport lecture11
21. 03. 2008
0 views

Transport lecture11

Fingerhut welcome
03. 04. 2008
0 views

Fingerhut welcome

BHTV BITE2000
08. 04. 2008
0 views

BHTV BITE2000

east vs west
10. 03. 2008
0 views

east vs west

Kids andTableTennis1
14. 04. 2008
0 views

Kids andTableTennis1

Self Leadership Lynn Joseph
16. 04. 2008
0 views

Self Leadership Lynn Joseph

WU Course 3
17. 04. 2008
0 views

WU Course 3

2007611162243264
23. 04. 2008
0 views

2007611162243264

CLI GM Vodcast trial
24. 04. 2008
0 views

CLI GM Vodcast trial

chintoda
07. 05. 2008
0 views

chintoda

insagb
02. 05. 2008
0 views

insagb

Lsn 9 SSA
03. 04. 2008
0 views

Lsn 9 SSA

EYESAFE
22. 01. 2008
0 views

EYESAFE

Wykle2007
16. 01. 2008
0 views

Wykle2007

tdb
07. 02. 2008
0 views

tdb

COED CMS Overview Oct 16 Final
10. 01. 2008
0 views

COED CMS Overview Oct 16 Final

colloq hc99
18. 01. 2008
0 views

colloq hc99

FairCASH Best Path ID
17. 01. 2008
0 views

FairCASH Best Path ID

Light 6
04. 02. 2008
0 views

Light 6